L'equipaggio della nave è andato disperso nell'oceano.

Questions & Answers about L'equipaggio della nave è andato disperso nell'oceano.

Why do we use andare here instead of essere to form the passive?
Using andare with past participles like disperso (missing), perso (lost), or distrutto (destroyed) creates a special passive form that emphasizes loss or destruction. It translates well to 'went missing' or 'was lost'. If we said è stato disperso, it would sound more like an outside force deliberately scattered the crew, rather than a tragic accident.
Since a crew consists of many people, why is the verb singular (è andato disperso)?
The word equipaggio (crew) is a collective noun. Even though it refers to a group of people, it is grammatically singular. Therefore, the auxiliary verb (è) and both participles (andato and disperso) must agree with the masculine singular noun equipaggio, not the plural individuals comprising it.
Could I say è andato perso instead of è andato disperso?
Not quite. While perso means 'lost' in a general sense (like losing an object or losing your way), disperso specifically means 'missing' when referring to people in emergencies, disasters, or military action. Using perso for a crew would sound like they just misplaced their map, rather than being tragically missing at sea.
Why do we use nell' instead of just in for the ocean?
When referring to the ocean, Italian uses the definite article, so in combines with l' to make nell'. While you might remember phrases like in mare (at sea) which drop the article to describe a general state, oceano normally requires the article because it is treated as a specific geographic entity.

Learn L'equipaggio della nave è andato disperso nell'oceano and more in Italian

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • Practice with interactive exercises
  • Track your progress with spaced repetition
  • Learn at your own pace — completely free