Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Vietnamese grammar and vocabulary.
Questions & Answers about Tôi đọc sách trên bàn.
Why is there no article or its equivalent before sách?
Vietnamese does not have articles like “a,” “an,” or “the.” Nouns remain in their bare form, and definiteness or indefiniteness is inferred from context or marked with classifiers and determiners. For example, một cuốn sách means “a book,” and cuốn sách đó means “that book.”
What part of speech is trên in this sentence, and what does it mean?
trên is a preposition meaning “on” or “on top of.” It introduces the locative phrase trên bàn, specifying where the action takes place.
Could I use ở instead of trên? How would that change the meaning?
Yes. You can say Tôi đọc sách ở trên bàn. Here, ở (“at/in”) plus trên (“on”) makes the location more explicit—literally “at on the table.” In everyday speech, trên bàn alone is sufficient and more common; ở trên bàn is slightly more emphatic about the exact spot.
Why does the location phrase trên bàn come at the end of the sentence?
Vietnamese follows a Subject-Verb-Object-Location (S-V-O-L) order. Place adverbials typically appear after the object, so trên bàn (“on the table”) naturally goes at the end.
How would I say “I am reading a book on the table” to specify a single book and the ongoing action?
Use the numeral-classifier một cuốn to specify one book, and add the aspect marker đang for the progressive. For example:
Tôi đang đọc một cuốn sách trên bàn.
How do I express the progressive aspect “am reading” without using đang?
Vietnamese often relies on context rather than explicit markers. Without đang, Tôi đọc sách trên bàn can still mean “I am reading books on the table” if the situation is clear. However, adding đang (Tôi đang đọc sách trên bàn) makes the continuous action unmistakable.
Why is there no plural marker on sách when it can mean “books”?
Nouns in Vietnamese do not inflect for number. Plurality is inferred from context or indicated with quantifiers like những or các. For example, Tôi đọc những cuốn sách trên bàn explicitly means “I read the books on the table.”
Can I omit Tôi in casual speech? What happens if I do?
Yes. You can drop Tôi when the subject is clear: Đọc sách trên bàn. It becomes a fragment but is easily understood in context. In writing or ambiguous situations, keeping Tôi helps clarity.
How do I turn this sentence into a yes/no question?
Add the question particle không at the end and use a rising intonation:
Tôi đọc sách trên bàn không?
Alternatively, with có…không (especially to confirm the action):
Tôi có đọc sách trên bàn không?
What’s the difference between bàn and cái bàn?
A classifier like cái is required when you’re counting or specifying objects (e.g., một cái bàn for “a table”). Using bare bàn (as in trên bàn) focuses on the location generically (“on [the] table”); adding cái (trên cái bàn) makes it explicit that you mean “on the table” as a distinct, countable object.