Квітка рожева.

In Ukrainian, the verb to be is usually omitted in the present tense.

So:

• Квітка рожева literally looks like Flower pink
• but it naturally means The flower is pink or A flower is pink

This is completely normal Ukrainian. English requires is, but Ukrainian usually does not in sentences like this.

Because the adjective has to agree with the noun.

Квітка is:

• feminine
• singular
• nominative

So the adjective must also be:

• feminine
• singular
• nominative

That gives рожева.

Compare:

• рожевий = masculine
• рожева = feminine
• рожеве = neuter
• рожеві = plural

So квітка рожева uses the feminine form because квітка is feminine.

A very common clue in Ukrainian is the ending.

Nouns ending in -а or -я are often feminine, and квітка ends in -а.

So a learner will usually recognize квітка as feminine right away.
Then the adjective also has to be feminine: рожева.

This is one of the most useful patterns to learn early.

Both words are in the nominative singular.

• Квітка is the subject
• рожева is a predicate adjective describing the subject

In a simple sentence like this, the noun and adjective are normally in the nominative.

So:

• квітка = nominative singular feminine noun
• рожева = nominative singular feminine adjective

Yes. It is still an adjective.

In Квітка рожева, the adjective is used predicatively, meaning it forms the statement about the noun:

• Квітка рожева = The flower is pink

Compare that with an adjective used directly before a noun:

• рожева квітка = a pink flower / the pink flower

So the same adjective can appear in both kinds of structures.

This is a very useful distinction:

• Квітка рожева = The flower is pink
• Рожева квітка = a pink flower / the pink flower

In the first sentence, рожева is the predicate: it tells you something about the flower.

In the second phrase, рожева directly modifies квітка and together they form one noun phrase.

So even though the same two words are used, the structure and meaning are different.

Usually, no—not in a neutral everyday sentence.

In standard Ukrainian, the present-tense is is normally omitted:

• natural: Квітка рожева
• usually unnatural as a basic statement: Квітка є рожева

The word є does exist, but it is not used like English is in most simple present-tense descriptions. It is more often used for existence, emphasis, or certain specific structures.

So for a basic sentence like this, just say:

• Квітка рожева

Because Ukrainian does not have articles.

So квітка can mean:

• a flower
• the flower

The exact meaning depends on context.

That is why Квітка рожева could be translated as:

• The flower is pink
• A flower is pink

In real use, context tells you which one sounds best.

A simple English-friendly approximation is:

• квітка ≈ kveet-ka
• рожева ≈ ro-zhe-va

A couple of helpful notes:

• і sounds like ee in see
• ж sounds like the s in measure
• кв is pronounced together, like kv

So the whole sentence is approximately:

kveet-ka ro-zhe-va

That is only an approximation, but it is a useful starting point.

Yes, it is a perfectly normal simple sentence.

It is short and basic, so in real conversation people might often add context, for example:

• Ця квітка рожева = This flower is pink
• Квітка дуже рожева = The flower is very pink

But by itself, Квітка рожева is grammatically correct and natural as a simple descriptive statement.