Breakdown of Переказ коштів можна скасувати.
Questions & Answers about Переказ коштів можна скасувати.
Why is it переказ коштів, not переказ кошти?
Because коштів is in the genitive plural, and that is the normal form after a noun like переказ when you mean a transfer of funds / money transfer.
So:
- переказ = transfer, remittance
- кошти = funds, money
- переказ коштів = transfer of funds
This is very similar to English transfer of funds, where of funds depends on transfer.
Also, кошти is usually used only in the plural, so its dictionary form is кошти, and the genitive plural is коштів.
What does можна do in this sentence?
Можна means it is possible / one may / can. It is a very common Ukrainian impersonal word used with an infinitive.
So:
- можна скасувати = can be canceled / it is possible to cancel
This construction does not need a personal subject like I, you, or they. It is just a general statement about possibility.
Examples:
- Це можна зробити. = This can be done.
- Квиток можна повернути. = The ticket can be returned.
Why is скасувати an infinitive?
Because after можна, Ukrainian normally uses the infinitive.
So the pattern is:
- можна + infinitive
Examples:
- можна купити = can buy
- можна змінити = can change
- можна скасувати = can cancel
In this sentence, скасувати is the basic to cancel form, not a conjugated form like скасовую, скасує, etc.
Why is it скасувати, not скасовувати?
This is about aspect.
- скасувати = perfective
- скасовувати = imperfective
The perfective form скасувати focuses on completing a single action: to cancel successfully, as a finished result.
That is why it sounds natural in this sentence:
- Переказ коштів можна скасувати. = The transfer can be canceled.
If you said можна скасовувати, it would sound more like:
- it is possible to be canceling
- one may cancel repeatedly / as a process
That is usually not what is meant here. For a one-time cancelation, скасувати is the normal choice.
Is this sentence passive?
In English, the natural translation is often passive:
- The money transfer can be canceled.
But Ukrainian does not have to use a passive form here. Instead, it uses an impersonal modal construction:
- Переказ коштів = money transfer
- можна скасувати = can cancel / can be canceled
So literally it is closer to:
- A transfer of funds can cancel is not correct English, but
- It is possible to cancel a transfer of funds is structurally closer.
In other words, Ukrainian often expresses an English passive idea without a true passive verb form.
Is переказ коштів the subject of the sentence?
Not quite in the same way as in a typical English sentence.
In Переказ коштів можна скасувати, the core is the impersonal phrase:
- можна скасувати = it is possible to cancel
And переказ коштів is the thing being canceled.
So from an English learner’s point of view, it is often easiest to understand the sentence as:
- As for the money transfer, it can be canceled.
You do not need to force it into an English-style subject-verb structure. Ukrainian allows this kind of impersonal setup very naturally.
Could the word order be different?
Yes. Ukrainian word order is fairly flexible.
The version you have:
- Переказ коштів можна скасувати.
is neutral and natural.
But you may also see:
- Можна скасувати переказ коштів.
This means the same thing, but the focus is slightly different. Starting with можна скасувати emphasizes the possibility/action first:
- It is possible to cancel the money transfer.
Starting with переказ коштів introduces the topic first:
- The money transfer can be canceled.
Both are correct.
Why is there no word for the in this sentence?
Because Ukrainian has no articles like a and the.
So переказ коштів can mean:
- a money transfer
- the money transfer
- money transfer
The exact meaning depends on context.
In many practical contexts, especially banking or app interfaces, this sentence will be understood as:
- The transfer can be canceled.
Could коштів be replaced with грошей?
Yes, sometimes, but the tone changes.
- коштів = funds, money — a bit more formal or institutional
- грошей = money — more everyday
So:
- переказ коштів sounds like banking, finance, official language
- переказ грошей is also understandable and common, but slightly less formal
In a financial or technical context, переказ коштів is often the better choice.
How would a native speaker naturally understand this sentence in context?
Usually as a practical statement such as:
- a transfer has not been finalized yet
- there is an option to reverse or stop it
- the system allows cancellation
So native speakers would likely read it as:
- This transfer can be canceled or
- You can cancel the transfer
Even though you is not present in the Ukrainian sentence, that meaning can easily be implied by context.
How is this sentence pronounced?
A helpful approximate pronunciation is:
peh-reh-KAZ KOSH-tiv MOZH-na skah-soo-VA-ty
A slightly more detailed guide:
- Переказ ≈ peh-reh-KAZ
- коштів ≈ KOSH-tiv
- можна ≈ MOZH-na
- скасувати ≈ skah-soo-VA-ty
Stress falls roughly like this:
- перека́з
- кошті́в
- мо́жна
- скасува́ти
Is скасувати the only verb you can use here?
No, but it is one of the most standard choices.
Depending on context, Ukrainian might also use verbs like:
- відмінити = to cancel
- анулювати = to annul, void
- припинити = to stop, terminate
But they are not always interchangeable.
For a transaction, order, booking, or transfer, скасувати is very common and neutral. It is a strong default choice for learners.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning UkrainianMaster Ukrainian — from Переказ коштів можна скасувати to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions