Breakdown of Elektrik kesilirse mum yakarız; geçen hafta da bir mum yetmemişti.
Questions & Answers about Elektrik kesilirse mum yakarız; geçen hafta da bir mum yetmemişti.
What does Elektrik kesilirse literally mean?
Literally, it means something like if the electricity gets cut.
In natural English, you would usually say:
- if the power goes out
- if the electricity is cut off
The verb here is kesilmek, which literally means to be cut or to get cut off. With elektrik, it is a very common way to talk about a power outage.
So:
- elektrik = electricity
- kesilmek = to be cut off
- elektrik kesilmek = for the power to go out
Why is it kesilirse and not just kesilir?
Kesilirse contains the conditional ending -se / -sa, so it means if it gets cut off.
Breakdown:
- kesil- = be cut off
- -ir = aorist/general tense marker
- -se = if
So:
- kesilir = it gets cut off / it is cut off / it tends to get cut off
- kesilirse = if it gets cut off
In Turkish, this is a very common way to form an if-clause.
Why is the verb kesilmek used here instead of kesmek?
Because the meaning is the electricity gets cut off, not someone cuts the electricity.
- kesmek = to cut
- kesilmek = to be cut / to get cut off
With power, water, internet, etc., Turkish often uses this passive/intransitive-looking form:
- Elektrik kesildi. = The power went out.
- Su kesildi. = The water was cut off.
- İnternet kesildi. = The internet went out / got disconnected.
So kesilmek is the natural choice.
What tense is yakarız, and why is that tense used?
Yakarız is in the aorist, which often expresses:
- habits
- general truths
- what people normally do
- likely responses in conditionals
Breakdown:
- yak- = burn/light
- -ar = aorist marker
- -ız = we
So yakarız means we light or we would light.
In this sentence, it does not mean only a present-time action. It means something more general:
- If the power goes out, we light a candle.
- In natural English: If the power goes out, we’ll light a candle or we light candles when the power goes out.
The aorist is very common in this kind of if X happens, we do Y sentence.
Why does yakarız mean we light a candle when yakmak often means to burn?
Because yakmak can mean both:
- to burn
- to light / set fire to
With things like candles, lamps, cigarettes, stoves, etc., yakmak often means to light.
Examples:
- mum yakmak = to light a candle
- sigara yakmak = to light a cigarette
- sobayı yakmak = to light the stove
So mum yakarız is the normal Turkish expression for we light a candle.
Why is it mum yakarız and not something like mumları yakarız?
Because the sentence is talking about the action in a general way, not about specific candles.
- mum yakarız = we light candles / we light a candle
- mumları yakarız = we light the candles
Without a plural marker or a definite ending, Turkish can be more general than English. Depending on context, mum yakarız may sound like:
- we light a candle
- we light candles
Here, the next clause mentions bir mum specifically, so the idea is probably we light a candle.
What does geçen hafta da mean, and what is da doing there?
Geçen hafta means last week.
The da here means too / also.
So:
- geçen hafta da = last week too / also last week
It connects the second clause to the first one. The meaning is something like:
- If the power goes out, we light a candle; and last week too, one candle wasn’t enough.
In smoother English, you might say:
- If the power goes out, we light a candle; in fact, last week one candle wasn’t enough either.
So da adds the sense of also / as well / too.
What does bir mum yetmemişti mean exactly?
It means one candle had not been enough.
The key verb is yetmek, which means:
- to be enough
- to suffice
So:
- Bir mum yetti. = One candle was enough.
- Bir mum yetmedi. = One candle was not enough.
- Bir mum yetmemişti. = One candle had not been enough.
This tells us that, in that past situation, one candle was insufficient.
How is yetmemişti built, and why are there both -miş and -ti?
Yetmemişti breaks down like this:
- yet- = be enough
- -me- = negation
- -miş = one past layer
- -ti = another past layer
Together, -mişti often works like a past perfect in English:
- had been
- had done
- had not been enough
So:
- yetmemişti = had not been enough
In many contexts, -mişti gives a sense of something that was already the case at that past time.
A useful comparison:
- yetmedi = was not enough
- yetmemişti = had not been enough
The second one sounds a little more like looking back on an already completed past situation.
Does -miş here mean the speaker did not witness it?
Not necessarily.
It is true that -miş by itself often has meanings like:
- reported information
- inferred information
- realization after the fact
But in -mişti, the combination often functions more like a past perfect/narrative past and does not always strongly emphasize hearsay.
So here, yetmemişti is best understood simply as:
- had not been enough
without assuming that the speaker only heard about it from someone else.
Why is there bir mum instead of just mum?
Is Elektrik kesilirse mum yakarız a general statement or a future one?
It is mainly a general statement about what we do in that situation, but in English it can also sound future-like.
So depending on context, you could understand it as:
- If the power goes out, we light a candle.
- If the power goes out, we’ll light a candle.
Turkish often uses the aorist in these conditionals where English may choose either simple present or will.
Could Turkish also say Elektrik kesilince mum yakarız? If so, what is the difference?
Yes, that would also be possible.
- Elektrik kesilirse = if the power goes out
- Elektrik kesilince = when the power goes out / whenever the power goes out
The difference is subtle:
- -irse/-arsa is more clearly conditional
- -ince/-ınca often means when or whenever
So:
- Elektrik kesilirse mum yakarız = If the power goes out, we light a candle.
- Elektrik kesilince mum yakarız = When the power goes out, we light a candle.
Both can work, but kesilirse matches the English-style if idea more directly.
Why is a semicolon used between the two clauses?
The semicolon links two closely related ideas:
- a general rule: If the power goes out, we light a candle
- a specific example from the past: last week too, one candle had not been enough
So the second clause supports or adds to the first.
You could also write it with a comma or a full stop, but the semicolon nicely shows that the ideas are connected.
What is the overall feel of the sentence in natural English?
A natural English version would be something like:
- If the power goes out, we light a candle; last week, one candle wasn’t enough either.
- If the electricity goes off, we light a candle; in fact, last week one candle wasn’t enough.
So the sentence combines:
- a usual response to power cuts
- a past example that adds extra detail or emphasis
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning TurkishMaster Turkish — from Elektrik kesilirse mum yakarız; geçen hafta da bir mum yetmemişti to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions