İtiraz gerekçesi iptal kararında kabul edildi.

The sentence breaks down like this:

• İtiraz gerekçesi = the grounds/reason for the objection
• iptal kararında = in the annulment/cancellation decision
• kabul edildi = was accepted

So the structure is:

• subject: itiraz gerekçesi
• location/context phrase: iptal kararında
• verb: kabul edildi

A very literal reading is:

• The objection ground was accepted in the annulment decision.

In more natural English, that often becomes something like:

• The grounds for the objection were accepted in the annulment decision.

Because itiraz gerekçesi is a Turkish noun compound.

In this kind of compound:

• the first noun modifies the second noun
• the second noun usually takes the 3rd person possessive suffix -(s)I

So:

• itiraz = objection
• gerekçe = reason, justification, grounds
• gerekçesi = its reason / the reason for it

Together:

• itiraz gerekçesi = the reason/grounds for the objection

This is a very common Turkish pattern. Compare:

• otobüs durağı = bus stop
• kimlik kartı = identity card
• toplantı saati = meeting time

So gerekçesi does not mean someone literally owns the reason; it is just how Turkish forms many noun combinations.

It means something like:

• the reason for the objection
• the justification for the objection
• the grounds for objection

In legal or formal language, gerekçe often means more than a simple everyday reason. It can mean the stated basis or justification behind a claim, objection, or decision.

So in legal English, grounds is often a very natural translation.

It comes from:

• iptal kararı = annulment/cancellation decision
• iptal kararında = in the annulment/cancellation decision

Here is the grammar:

1. karar = decision
2. iptal kararı = annulment decision
   
   • this is another noun compound
3. then the locative ending is added: -DA = in/at/on
4. because kararı already has a possessive ending, Turkish inserts a buffer n

So:

• kararı + da would not be said directly
• it becomes kararında

That n is very common after possessed forms:

• evi → evinde
• adı → adında
• kararı → kararında

So iptal kararında means in the annulment decision.

Because the verb is based on kabul etmek, which means to accept.

So:

• kabul etmek = to accept
• kabul edilmek = to be accepted
• kabul edildi = was accepted

This is a common Turkish verb pattern:

• a noun or verbal noun + etmek
• then the passive is often made through edilmek

Examples:

• ilan etmek = to announce

• ilan edildi = it was announced

• tespit etmek = to determine
• tespit edildi = it was determined

So kabul edildi is the passive past form: was accepted.

Turkish often uses the passive when the agent is:

• unknown
• unimportant
• obvious from context
• deliberately left unstated

So kabul edildi focuses on the result, not on who did it.

If you wanted an active version, you might say:

• Mahkeme itiraz gerekçesini kabul etti.
• The court accepted the grounds for the objection.

Notice the difference:

• active: someone accepted it
• passive: it was accepted

In formal, legal, and bureaucratic Turkish, passive wording is extremely common.

In this sentence, it functions as the subject of the passive sentence.

That is why it appears without the accusative ending.

Compare:

• Mahkeme itiraz gerekçesini kabul etti.

  • Here itiraz gerekçesini is the object
  • It has the accusative -ni

• İtiraz gerekçesi kabul edildi.

  • Here it becomes the subject of the passive sentence
  • So there is no accusative ending

This is very similar to English:

• The court accepted the objection grounds.
• The objection grounds were accepted.

Grammatically, gerekçesi is singular.

But in formal English, especially legal English, grounds is often used where Turkish has singular gerekçe. That is because English grounds can refer to the basis or justification for something in a collective or legal sense.

So depending on context, all of these may work:

• the reason for the objection
• the justification for the objection
• the grounds for the objection

So the Turkish form is singular, but the best English translation may still be plural.

Because Turkish normally puts the verb at the end, and other elements come before it.

A common neutral order is:

• subject + other information + verb

So here:

• İtiraz gerekçesi
• iptal kararında
• kabul edildi

Turkish word order is somewhat flexible, though. You could also say:

• İptal kararında itiraz gerekçesi kabul edildi.

That version puts a little more focus on where/in what context the acceptance happened.

So the sentence-final verb is the most important fixed feature; the rest can move more freely for emphasis.

Because Turkish has no articles like English the and a/an.

Definiteness is usually understood from:

• context
• word order
• case marking
• noun-compound structure
• the overall situation

So Turkish can simply say:

• itiraz gerekçesi
• iptal kararında
• kabul edildi

and English may still need to add the:

• the grounds for the objection
• the annulment decision

Turkish sometimes uses bir for a/an, but not every indefinite noun needs it, and it would not fit naturally here.