Tiden räcker inte till för allt idag.

Tid means time in a general sense. Tiden is the definite form, meaning the time.

In this sentence, Swedish is talking about the specific amount of time available today, so tiden sounds natural. English often says there isn't enough time, but Swedish can express that idea with the time isn't enough.

Räcka till means to be enough, to suffice, or to stretch far enough.

So Tiden räcker inte till means that the available time is not sufficient.

You will often see räcka till with things like:

• Pengarna räcker inte till. = The money isn't enough.
• Maten räcker till alla. = The food is enough for everyone.

Because räcka till is a verb + particle combination.

In Swedish main clauses, the finite verb often comes early in the sentence, while the particle can stay later:

• Tiden räcker inte till.

But in an infinitive, they stay together:

• att räcka till

And in a subordinate clause, you still get:

• ... att tiden inte räcker till

So räcker and till belong together in meaning, even though they are split up.

This is normal Swedish word order in a main clause.

Swedish usually puts the finite verb in second position, and inte normally comes after that verb:

• Tiden räcker inte till ...

So the pattern is:

• Tiden = subject
• räcker = finite verb
• inte = negation

If this were a subordinate clause, inte would come before the verb phrase more in the English way:

• ... att tiden inte räcker till ...

Here för means for.

So för allt means for everything.

A useful thing to notice is that the first till belongs to the verb räcka till, while för allt tells us what there is not enough time for.

So the structure is roughly:

• räcker inte till = isn't enough
• för allt = for everything
• idag = today

Yes. Allt and allting both mean everything.

So you could also say:

• Tiden räcker inte till för allting idag.

Allt is shorter and very common. Allting can sound a little fuller or slightly more emphatic, but both are natural.

No, it can move, but the end position is very natural here.

For example, you could also say:

• Idag räcker tiden inte till för allt.

That puts extra focus on today.

The original version:

• Tiden räcker inte till för allt idag.

sounds very normal and neutral.

Yes. Both idag and i dag are accepted.

• idag is the more common modern spelling.
• i dag is also correct.

So the sentence could also be written:

• Tiden räcker inte till för allt i dag.

This is an important difference.

• räcker inte till = there is not enough time/resources
• hinner inte = someone does not manage to do something before time runs out

So:

• Tiden räcker inte till för allt idag. = There isn't enough time for everything today.

Compare:

• Jag hinner inte med allt idag. = I won't manage to get through everything today.

The first talks about the amount of time. The second talks about someone's ability to finish in time.

A very common example would be:

• Jag tror att tiden inte räcker till för allt idag. = I think the time isn't enough for everything today.

This is useful because you can see the word order change:

• main clause: Tiden räcker inte till ...
• subordinate clause: ... att tiden inte räcker till ...

So inte comes before the full verb phrase in the subordinate clause.

Yes. A few natural alternatives are:

• Det finns inte tid för allt idag.
  = There isn't time for everything today.

• Det räcker inte med tid för allt idag.
  = There isn't enough time for everything today.

• Jag hinner inte med allt idag.
  = I won't manage everything today.

These are not identical in structure, but they express a very similar idea. The original sentence is completely natural and idiomatic.