Log inSign up

Om du är trött, kan du ta en kort paus.

Om du är trött, kan du ta en kort paus.
If you are tired, you can take a short break.
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Swedish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Swedish now

Questions & Answers about Om du är trött, kan du ta en kort paus.

Why does the sentence start with Om—what kind of word is it?

Om is a subordinating conjunction meaning if. It introduces a subordinate (dependent) clause: Om du är trött. Swedish often uses om for real/possible conditions (like English if).

Why is there a comma after trött?

The comma separates the subordinate clause (Om du är trött) from the main clause (kan du ta en kort paus). In Swedish, a comma here is common and recommended, especially when the subordinate clause comes first, though in short sentences you may sometimes see it omitted in informal writing.

Why is it kan du and not du kan?

Because Swedish uses verb-second (V2) word order in main clauses. When you start with something other than the subject (here, the whole Om-clause counts as the first element), the finite verb comes next, then the subject:

  • Om du är trött, kan du ta en kort paus.
    Not: Om du är trött, du kan...
What does är mean here, and why is it used?

är is the present tense of vara (to be). Swedish uses vara + adjective the same way English does:

  • du är trött = you are tired
Why is trött not changing form—does it ever?

Yes, Swedish adjectives can change depending on gender/number/definiteness. Here it stays trött because it describes du (a singular person).
Other forms you might see:

  • ett trött barn (neuter -t form)
  • trötta barn (plural)
  • den trötta personen (definite)
Is kan literally can, or does it mean may here?

kan is the modal verb kunna and often corresponds to English can, but in contexts like this it can also feel like you can / you may / you’re able to / it’s okay to. It suggests a permitted or reasonable option rather than physical ability.

Why is it ta and not something like att ta?

After modal verbs like kan, Swedish uses the bare infinitive (no att):

  • kan ta (can take)
    You use att in many other infinitive constructions, but typically not after modals (kan, ska, vill, måste, bör, etc.).
What does ta mean here—does it really mean “take”?

Yes, ta literally means take, but Swedish uses ta in many fixed expressions where English uses different verbs, like take a break:

  • ta en paus = take a break
    So it’s a very natural collocation in Swedish.
Why is it en kort paus and not ett kort paus?

Because paus is an en-word (common gender): en paus.
The adjective kort matches the noun:

  • en kort paus (common gender → adjective has no -t)
    Compare:
  • ett kort stopp (neuter ett → adjective often has -t)
Why is the adjective kort before the noun?

In Swedish, attributive adjectives (adjectives describing a noun inside a noun phrase) normally come before the noun:

  • en kort paus
    Post-noun adjectives are uncommon and usually belong to different structures.
Could I say the sentence without starting with the Om-clause?

Yes. If you put the main clause first, the word order changes back to normal (subject before verb):

  • Du kan ta en kort paus om du är trött.
    Both are correct; starting with the Om-clause often feels a bit more “set up” or explanatory.
How is this sentence pronounced (especially the tricky words)?

Some common pronunciation points:

  • om: like om with a short o (not like English ohm)
  • är: sounds like /ɛr/ (roughly like air but shorter/Swedish r)
  • trött: has the ö vowel (/œ/), similar to French peur; final tt is crisp
  • paus: au is like ow in cow for many speakers, and s is voiceless (not z)