Este texto es fácil de comprender.

Because texto is a masculine singular noun, so the demonstrative has to match it:

• este = this (masculine singular)
• esta = this (feminine singular)

So:

• este texto = this text
• esta carta = this letter

In Spanish, words like this/that usually agree in gender and number with the noun they describe.

Este is a demonstrative determiner. It points to a specific noun, like this in English.

In Este texto es fácil de comprender:

• este = this
• texto = text

So este is not standing alone; it is directly modifying texto.

Compare:

• Este texto = this text
• Este es fácil de comprender = this one is easy to understand

In the second example, este works more like a pronoun.

Es is the third-person singular form of ser in the present tense.

The subject is este texto, which is singular, so Spanish uses es:

• Este texto es... = This text is...

If the subject were plural, the verb would change:

• Estos textos son fáciles de comprender.

So the verb agrees with the subject in number.

This is a very common Spanish structure:

• adjective + de + infinitive

So:

• fácil de comprender
• difícil de explicar
• imposible de resolver

It means something like easy to understand, difficult to explain, impossible to solve.

English often uses adjective + to + verb, but Spanish often uses adjective + de + infinitive in this type of sentence.

So:

• easy to understand → fácil de comprender

Yes, in this sentence, de is the normal and correct choice.

With adjectives like fácil, difícil, complicado, imposible, Spanish commonly uses:

• fácil de + infinitive
• difícil de + infinitive

So:

• Este texto es fácil de comprender.
• La lección es difícil de explicar.

If you say Este texto es fácil comprender, that sounds incorrect in standard Spanish.

Yes. That is completely natural, and many learners will hear entender more often in everyday speech.

Both are correct:

• fácil de comprender
• fácil de entender

A rough difference:

• entender is often more common in everyday conversation
• comprender can sound a little more formal or a little more like grasp fully

But in many contexts, they overlap a lot.

In many situations, they mean almost the same thing: to understand.

Very broadly:

• entender = to understand
• comprender = to understand, sometimes with a slightly more formal or deeper feel

For example:

• No entiendo. = I don't understand.
• Comprendo su situación. = I understand your situation.

In your sentence, comprender sounds perfectly natural, especially in written or slightly formal language.

Because este already determines the noun.

In English, you also say this text, not the this text. Spanish works similarly:

• este texto = this text
• not el este texto

Demonstratives like este, esa, aquellos already do the job of specifying the noun.

Fácil has a written accent because of Spanish stress rules.

It is pronounced with the stress on the fa- syllable:

• FÁ-cil

Without the accent, the word would follow normal spelling rules and be stressed differently, so the accent mark shows the correct pronunciation.

This is also useful when the word changes number:

• fácil
• fáciles

The stressed syllable stays the same.

Normally, no. In this sentence, para is not the right preposition.

Spanish uses:

• fácil de comprender

not:

• fácil para comprender

Para would suggest a different relationship, often purpose, and it does not fit the standard pattern here.

So the natural version is:

• Este texto es fácil de comprender.

Yes, but the original order is the most neutral and natural:

• Este texto es fácil de comprender.

You could also hear:

• Es fácil de comprender este texto.

That version is grammatically possible, but it sounds more marked or stylistic. It may be used to emphasize es fácil de comprender first.

For most learners, the standard order is the best one to use.

It would be:

• Estos textos son fáciles de comprender.

Notice all the changes:

• este → estos
• texto → textos
• es → son
• fácil → fáciles

So Spanish shows agreement in several places, not just one.

It uses ser: es.

That is because the sentence is describing a characteristic of the text: it is easy to understand. This is seen as a general quality, not a temporary state or location.

So:

• Este texto es fácil de comprender.

Using estar here would sound wrong.

This is one of the common uses of ser: describing what something is like.

A Spain Spanish pronunciation would be approximately:

• EH-steh TEKS-toh es FA-thil deh kom-pren-DER

A few notes:

• z does not appear here, but in Spain many speakers use the th sound for c before e/i
• so fácil is often pronounced roughly like FA-thil in much of Spain
• texto has a clear ks sound in the middle

In much of Latin America, fácil would sound more like FA-sil.