Entregamos un archivo editable para el encargo de traducción.

Because Spanish often drops subject pronouns when they are already clear from the verb form.

• Entregamos already tells you the subject is we
• So (nosotros) entregamos and entregamos both mean the same thing

Spanish usually adds nosotros only for emphasis, contrast, or clarity.

• Nosotros entregamos el archivo, no ellos. = We deliver the file, not them.

Entregamos is the 1st person plural form of entregar (to deliver, to hand over, to provide).

Here is the present tense:

• yo entrego
• tú entregas
• él/ella/usted entrega
• nosotros/nosotras entregamos
• vosotros/vosotras entregáis
• ellos/ellas/ustedes entregan

So entregamos = we deliver / we provide / we hand over.

Yes. This is a very common learner question.

For many -ar verbs, the present and the preterite look the same in the nosotros form:

• entregamos = we deliver / we are delivering
• entregamos = we delivered

The meaning depends on context.

For example:

• Cada semana entregamos archivos editables. → present
• Ayer entregamos el archivo. → past

In a sentence like this one, especially in a business or service description, it will usually be understood as present.

Because in Spanish, most adjectives normally come after the noun.

So:

• un archivo editable = an editable file

This is the most natural order because editable is simply describing the type or quality of the file.

Putting the adjective before the noun is much less common here and would sound unnatural.

Because editable is one of many Spanish adjectives that have the same form for masculine and feminine singular.

Compare:

• un archivo editable
• una versión editable

The adjective stays editable in both.

It only changes for number:

• un archivo editable
• dos archivos editables

Because archivo is a masculine noun.

You can usually tell from the article:

• el archivo
• un archivo

So the article has to agree with the noun:

• un archivo editable

Because para usually expresses purpose, intended use, or destination.

Here, the file is being provided for the translation assignment, so para is the natural choice:

• para el encargo de traducción = for the translation assignment

By contrast, por is more often used for ideas like:

• cause
• reason
• exchange
• movement through
• agent in passive-style meanings

So por el encargo would not sound right here.

Standard Spanish only has two compulsory contractions:

• a + el = al
• de + el = del

But:

• para + el stays para el
• con + el stays con el

So para el encargo is correct.

You may hear reduced spoken forms in informal speech in some places, but in standard written Spanish it remains para el.

Using el suggests a specific assignment or commission, something already known in the situation.

• para el encargo de traducción = for the translation assignment

If you said para un encargo de traducción, it would sound more general:

• for a translation assignment

Spanish often uses the definite article where English might be more flexible, but here the main idea is still specific vs. non-specific.

Because de + noun is often used in Spanish to classify or label something by type or function.

So:

• encargo de traducción = translation assignment
• empresa de software = software company
• clase de español = Spanish class

Here de traducción means an assignment whose type is translation.

If you said de la traducción, it would usually point more to a specific translation already identified in context.

So:

• el encargo de traducción = the translation assignment / the translation job
• el encargo de la traducción = the task/assignment of doing the translation

Both can exist, but de traducción is more compact and more natural as a label.

In this context, encargo means something like:

• assignment
• job
• commission
• task requested by a client

It is a useful word in professional contexts, especially when someone has asked for a service.

Compared with similar words:

• encargo = a task/order/commission someone gives you
• trabajo = work/job in a broad sense
• proyecto = project
• pedido = order, especially for products/goods

So in a translation-services context, encargo is a very natural choice.

Sometimes, yes, but they are not always exactly the same.

• archivo usually means a file, especially a digital one
• documento often means a document, focusing more on the content

So if the idea is specifically that the client receives a file they can edit, archivo editable is very natural.

If you said documento editable, that can also be correct, but it may suggest the editable text/document itself rather than the file as a digital object.