Si la manejas con descuido, podrías quebrar toda la vajilla y perder mucho dinero.

Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Spanish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Spanish now

Questions & Answers about Si la manejas con descuido, podrías quebrar toda la vajilla y perder mucho dinero.

Why does the si clause use manejas (present indicative) instead of the subjunctive?

In Spanish, after si meaning if (a real or possible condition), you normally use the indicative, not the subjunctive: Si la manejas...
The subjunctive after si is used in different patterns (like Si la manejaras...), which expresses a more hypothetical or less likely situation.

What does manejar mean here? I thought it only meant to drive.

In Latin American Spanish, manejar can mean to drive, but it can also mean to handle / operate / manage something (a tool, a machine, a fragile object, etc.).
Here it means to handle it (because the next part talks about breaking dishes).

What is la in Si la manejas and where does it go?

La is a direct object pronoun meaning it (referring to a feminine noun, like la caja, la bandeja, la vajilla, etc.).
In front of a conjugated verb, Spanish places object pronouns before the verb: la manejas = you handle it.

Why is it manejas (tú) and not maneja (usted)?

Manejas is the form (informal you). If you wanted the formal usted, it would be:
Si la maneja con descuido, podría...
The rest of the sentence would adjust accordingly (podría instead of podrías).

What does con descuido mean, and could I say it another way?

Con descuido means carelessly / without being careful.
Common alternatives:

  • sin cuidado (carelessly)
  • de manera descuidada (in a careless way)
  • descuidadamente (more formal/less common in conversation)
Why does it say podrías instead of puedes?

Podrías (conditional) expresses possibility in a more hypothetical/softer way: you could break everything.
Puedes (present) is more direct: you can / you’re able to. It can sound like ability or permission, not just risk.
So podrías fits the idea of a potential negative consequence.

How does this Si + present, conditional structure work?

Si + present indicative + conditional often expresses a realistic possibility and its possible result:
If you do X (now/in general), you could/would do Y.
Example pattern: Si comes mucho, te sentirías mal = If you eat a lot, you could/would feel sick.

Could the sentence also be Si la manejaras con descuido, podrías...?

Yes, but it changes the nuance.

  • Si la manejas..., podrías... = a real/likely possibility (a warning about what can happen).
  • Si la manejaras..., podrías... = more hypothetical, like imagining a scenario (often implying you probably won’t, or it’s just a scenario).
What does quebrar mean here, and is it common in Latin America?

Quebrar here means to break (especially something that cracks/shatters, like ceramics or glass). It’s common in many Latin American countries.
A very common alternative is romper: podrías romper toda la vajilla.

I’ve heard quebrar can mean to go bankrupt. Is that related?

Yes. Quebrar can also mean to go bankrupt (for a business/person), depending on context.
In this sentence, the direct object toda la vajilla makes it clear it means to break physical objects.

Why is vajilla singular if it refers to many items?

La vajilla is a collective noun meaning dinnerware / dishware (the set of plates, cups, etc.). Even though it includes many pieces, it’s treated as singular: toda la vajilla.
You could say todas las piezas de la vajilla if you want to emphasize individual pieces.

Does y perder mucho dinero mean you lose money because you broke the dishes?

Yes—y links a second consequence with the same subject (). The idea is:
If you handle it carelessly, you might break all the dishware and (as a result) lose a lot of money (replacing it, paying for damages, etc.).