Questions & Answers about Jutros sam čitala poruku.
Why does čitala end in -la?
Because the past participle agrees with the speaker’s gender.
- čitala = feminine singular
- čitao = masculine singular
- čitalo = neuter singular
So Jutros sam čitala poruku. tells you the speaker is female.
If a man said it, it would be:
Jutros sam čitao poruku.
What tense is this sentence?
This is the Serbian perfect tense.
It is formed with:
- the auxiliary sam (I am / have, in this structure)
- plus the past participle čitala
So:
- sam čitala = I read / I was reading / I have read, depending on context
In Serbian, this is the normal past tense used in everyday speech.
Why is sam in the middle of the sentence instead of after čitala?
Because sam is a clitic, and clitics in Serbian usually go in second position in the sentence or clause.
So in:
Jutros sam čitala poruku.
- Jutros comes first
- sam comes second
This is very natural Serbian word order.
You would not normally say:
- Jutros čitala sam poruku. ❌
The correct placement is:
- Jutros sam čitala poruku. ✅
What does jutros mean exactly?
Jutros means this morning or earlier this morning.
It is an adverb of time.
Examples:
- Jutros sam ustala rano. = I got up early this morning.
- Jutros je padala kiša. = It was raining this morning.
It refers specifically to the morning of the current day.
Why is it poruku and not poruka?
Because poruku is in the accusative case, which is used for the direct object.
The basic form is:
- poruka = message
But in this sentence, message is the thing being read, so it is the direct object:
- čitala poruku = read the message
For feminine nouns ending in -a, the singular accusative usually ends in -u:
- poruka → poruku
- knjiga → knjigu
- novina → novinu
Why is there no word for I in the sentence?
Because Serbian often drops the subject pronoun when it is already clear.
Here, sam already shows first person singular, so ja is not necessary.
- Jutros sam čitala poruku. = natural
- Ja sam jutros čitala poruku. = also correct, but more emphatic
You would add ja if you want contrast or emphasis, for example:
- Ja sam čitala poruku, ne ona.
- I was reading the message, not her.
What is the infinitive of čitala?
The infinitive is čitati, meaning to read.
So:
- čitati = to read
- čitala = read / was reading, feminine past form
This verb is imperfective, which means it focuses on the process, repetition, or ongoing nature of the action rather than its completion.
Why use čitati here and not pročitati?
This is a question about aspect, which is very important in Serbian.
- čitati = imperfective, to read / to be reading
- pročitati = perfective, to read through / to finish reading
So:
- Jutros sam čitala poruku. can suggest I was reading the message this morning or simply report the action without stressing completion.
- Jutros sam pročitala poruku. clearly means I read/finished reading the message this morning.
A learner should know that English read can match either Serbian aspect, depending on context.
Can the word order be changed?
Yes. Serbian word order is fairly flexible, but not completely free.
The neutral version is:
- Jutros sam čitala poruku.
Other possible versions include:
- Poruku sam čitala jutros.
- Sam jutros čitala poruku. ❌
The second-position rule for sam still matters, so some changes are possible and some are not.
Changing the order usually changes focus or emphasis, not the basic meaning.
For example:
- Poruku sam čitala jutros. emphasizes the message
- Jutros sam čitala poruku. is a neutral statement
How is č pronounced in čitala?
č is pronounced like ch in chocolate, but usually a bit firmer and clearer.
So čitala sounds roughly like:
- CHEE-ta-la
And jutros sam čitala poruku is roughly:
- YOO-tros sam CHEE-ta-la PO-roo-koo
A few pronunciation notes:
- j = English y
- č = ch
- c = ts
- š = sh
- ž = the s in measure
Is this sentence definite or indefinite in English? Does poruku mean a message or the message?
Serbian has no articles, so poruku can mean either:
- a message
- the message
The exact meaning depends on context.
So this sentence could be understood as:
- I was reading a message this morning.
- I read the message this morning.
Context tells you which one is intended.
Could this sentence mean I was reading the message this morning as well as I read the message this morning?
Yes. Serbian past forms do not always match English tenses one-to-one.
Because the verb is imperfective (čitati), the sentence can often be interpreted as:
- I was reading the message this morning
- or sometimes simply I read the message this morning
The exact English translation depends on context.
If Serbian wants to stress that the action was completed, it would more naturally use the perfective verb:
- Jutros sam pročitala poruku.
So aspect is often more important than trying to match English tense names exactly.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning SerbianMaster Serbian — from Jutros sam čitala poruku to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions