Log inSign up

В ванной вода плохо уходила, потому что в трубе был засор.

В ванной вода плохо уходила, потому что в трубе был засор.
In the bathroom the water drained poorly because there was a clog in the pipe.

Breakdown of В ванной вода плохо уходила, потому что в трубе был засор.

вода
the water
в
in
быть
to be
потому что
because
ванная
the bathroom
плохо
poorly
уходить
to drain away
труба
the pipe
засор
the clog
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Russian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Russian now

Questions & Answers about В ванной вода плохо уходила, потому что в трубе был засор.

Why is the verb уходила in the feminine form?

Because the subject is вода (water), which is grammatically feminine in Russian. In the past tense, verbs agree with the subject in gender and number:

  • вода уходила = water (fem. sg.) was draining
    Compare:
  • сток уходил (a drain, masc.)
  • воды уходили (waters, plural)
What does уходила mean here? I thought уходить means “to leave (walk away).”

Уходить can mean “to leave” for people, but it also has a common meaning “to drain / to run off” for liquids:

  • Вода уходит = the water drains / goes down
    So вода плохо уходила is “the water wasn’t draining well.”
Why is it плохо уходила and not something like “slowly drained”?

плохо is an adverb meaning “badly / poorly,” and with drainage it often implies “not properly,” which can include being slow, not going down fully, backing up, etc. If you want to be more specific, Russian can say:

  • медленно уходила = drained slowly
  • не уходила = didn’t drain (at all)
    But плохо уходила is a very natural all-purpose complaint.
Why is the verb imperfective (уходила) and not perfective (ушла)?

Imperfective past (уходила) describes an ongoing state/background situation: the water “was draining badly” (over a period of time, as a situation you noticed). Perfective (ушла) would sound like a single completed event:

  • Вода плохо ушла = the water drained poorly (that one time / it did drain, but badly)
    In complaints about a drain not working, imperfective is typically what you want.
What is the function of В ванной at the beginning? Why is it in that form?

В ванной means “in the bathroom” (location), setting the scene: “In the bathroom, …” It’s в + prepositional case because it answers “where?” (где?):

  • в ванной (where?)
    If it were motion “into,” you’d use accusative:
  • в ванную (where to?) = into the bathroom
Does в ванной mean “in the bathroom” or “in the bathtub”?

Strictly speaking, в ванной most directly means “in the bathroom” (room) because ванная = bathroom. “In the bathtub” is usually:

  • в ванне
    However, in everyday speech people sometimes say в ванной in contexts like this and mean “in the bath area / bathtub,” but if you want to be unambiguous, в ванне is the clearer choice for “in the tub.”
Why is there a comma before потому что?

Because потому что introduces a subordinate clause of cause (“because …”). In Russian, the main clause and the потому что clause are normally separated by a comma:

  • …, потому что …
Could I switch the order and start with потому что?

Yes. You can front the reason clause, and the comma rules still apply:

  • Потому что в трубе был засор, вода в ванной плохо уходила.
    Both versions are correct; the original simply starts with the setting (В ванной) and the symptom first.
Why is it в трубе and not some other case?

в трубе uses в + prepositional again because it’s location (“in the pipe”), answering где? (“where?”). If you needed motion into the pipe (rare in this context), you’d use accusative:

  • в трубу (into the pipe)
What does засор mean exactly, and how is it used?

засор means a “clog / blockage” (usually in plumbing, but it can be used more broadly). Common patterns:

  • засор в трубе = a clog in the pipe
  • устранить засор = remove/clear a clog
  • из-за засора = because of a clog (using из-за)
Why does it say был засор instead of something like “the pipe was clogged”?

Russian often expresses this idea as “there was a clog”:

  • в трубе был засор = there was a clog in the pipe
    You can also say “the pipe got clogged”:
  • труба засорилась (perfective) = the pipe got clogged
  • труба засорялась (imperfective) = the pipe would get clogged / was getting clogged
    The sentence you have is a neutral, very common “there was X” structure.
Can the verb быть be omitted here?

In the present tense, yes:

  • В трубе засор. = There’s a clog in the pipe.
    But in the past you normally use был/была/было/были:
  • В трубе был засор. = There was a clog.
    Omitting был in the past is possible in some styles, but it’s not the neutral everyday default.
What are the key pronunciation/stress points in this sentence?

Common stress patterns learners ask about:

  • уходи́ла (stress on -и́-)
  • засо́р (stress on -о́р)
  • потому́ что (stress on -му́-)