Log inSign up

В спальне батарея была холодной, потому что отопление ещё не включили.

В спальне батарея была холодной, потому что отопление ещё не включили.
In the bedroom the radiator was cold because the heating hasn’t been turned on yet.

Breakdown of В спальне батарея была холодной, потому что отопление ещё не включили.

холодный
cold
в
in
быть
to be
не
not
потому что
because
спальня
the bedroom
включить
to turn on
ещё
yet
батарея
the radiator
отопление
the heating
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Russian grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Russian now

Questions & Answers about В спальне батарея была холодной, потому что отопление ещё не включили.

Why does батарея mean a radiator here? I thought it meant a “battery.”

In Russian, батарея can mean both:

  • battery (e.g., батарея телефона = phone battery)
  • radiator / heating radiator (very common in homes: батарея в комнате)

In the context of спальня and отопление, it’s clearly the radiator.

Why is it в спальне? What case is спальне and why?

В спальне means in the bedroom. After в meaning location (“in/inside”), Russian uses the Prepositional case:

  • спальня (dictionary form, nominative)
  • в спальне (prepositional)

So it answers “Where?” — Where was it cold? In the bedroom.

Why is the word order В спальне батарея была холодной and not Батарея была холодной в спальне?

Both are possible. Russian word order is flexible and used for emphasis/topic:

  • В спальне батарея была холодной… = sets the scene first (“As for the bedroom…” / “In the bedroom…”)
  • Батарея была холодной в спальне… = starts with the subject (“The radiator was cold…”), and location comes later

The chosen order often matches what the speaker wants to foreground (here: the location).

Why do we have была? How does past tense agreement work?

Past tense in Russian agrees with the subject in gender and number:

  • батарея is feminine singular
  • therefore past tense of быть is была

Compare:

  • радиатор был холодным (masc.)
  • окно было открыто (neut.)
  • батареи были холодными (plural)
Why is холодной in that form? Why not холодная?

After быть in the past/future, the “predicate adjective” is often in the Instrumental case, especially in more neutral/formal style:

  • батарея была холодной (instrumental adjective)

You may also hear nominative in casual speech:

  • батарея была холодная (more conversational)

There’s also a short-form option:

  • батарея была холодна (more literary/concise)
Is была холодной the same as “was cold,” or is it more like “was being cold”?
In normal context, была холодной simply means was cold (a state at that time). Russian doesn’t need a special progressive form here; the past tense + adjective already expresses the state.
Why is there a comma before потому что?

Because потому что introduces a subordinate clause (“because…”). In Russian, a subordinate clause is normally separated by a comma:

  • …, потому что …

This is standard punctuation.

What’s the difference between потому что and other words for “because,” like так как?

They’re close, but common tendencies are:

  • потому что = very common, neutral, often answers a direct “why?”
  • так как = slightly more bookish/official; often sounds like “since/as”

In many everyday sentences, either works with little change in meaning.

Why does the sentence use отопление and not something like “radiator” again?

отопление means heating (system/heat in the building). The idea is:

  • the radiator was cold because the heating hadn’t been turned on yet

So it’s not about that one radiator being broken; it’s about the heating system not running.

Why does it say ещё не включили? What does ещё add?

ещё here means yet / still.
So ещё не включили = hadn’t turned it on yet (up to that time, it still wasn’t on).

Without ещё, не включили is simply “didn’t turn on,” and it can sound less clearly connected to “not yet.”

Who is “they” in не включили? Why is it 3rd person plural?

Russian often uses 3rd person plural with no explicit subject to mean “they / people / the staff / someone” in an indefinite way:

  • не включили = “they didn’t turn it on” ≈ “it wasn’t turned on (by whoever is responsible)”

It’s a common everyday alternative to a passive construction.

Why is it включили (perfective) and not включали (imperfective)?

включить → включили (perfective) focuses on the single result/event: “to switch on (and have it on).”
So ещё не включили strongly implies: the action has not happened (yet).

включали (imperfective) would suggest repeated/ongoing attempts or a general habit, e.g.:

  • Отопление ещё не включали can also mean “They haven’t turned the heating on yet,” but it can feel more like “they haven’t been turning it on” (less result-focused). Both can be used, but включили is very natural when you expect the heating to be switched on as a one-time action for the season/day.
What case is отопление in, and why?

It’s the direct object of включили, so it’s in the Accusative case.
For neuter inanimate nouns like отопление, accusative looks the same as nominative:

  • отопление (nom.)
  • включили отопление (acc., same form)