On stawia talerz na stole.

Breakdown of On stawia talerz na stole.

on
he
na
on
stół
the table
talerz
the plate
stawiać
to put
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Polish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Polish now

Questions & Answers about On stawia talerz na stole.

Why do we need On? Can we just say Stawia talerz na stole?

In Polish, the subject pronoun (on, ona, oni, etc.) is usually optional, because the verb ending already shows who is doing the action.

  • On stawia talerz na stole. – He puts the plate on the table.
  • Stawia talerz na stole. – He/She puts the plate on the table. (gender is understood from context)

You use On:

  • when you want to emphasize it is “he” (and not someone else)
  • or when it’s not clear from context who is doing the action.

Otherwise, dropping on is completely natural.

What exactly does stawia mean, and how is it different from kładzie?

Both verbs can translate as “puts”, but they have slightly different typical uses:

  • stawiać / postawić – usually about placing something upright / standing

    • On stawia talerz na stole. – He puts the plate (down) on the table. (neutral, quite common in speech)
    • Stawia szklankę na biurku. – He puts the glass on the desk.
  • kłaść / położyć – about putting something lying down, “laying” something

    • On kładzie talerz na stole. – He lays the plate on the table.
    • Kładzie książkę na łóżku. – He lays the book on the bed.

For things like plates, glasses, etc., both are often acceptable, and speakers use them somewhat interchangeably in everyday speech. Grammatically, stawia and kładzie here are both 3rd person singular, present tense, imperfective (“he puts / is putting”).

Why is it talerz, not something like talerza or talerzem?

Talerz is a masculine noun (“plate”). In the sentence:

On stawia talerz na stole.

talerz is the direct object (what is being put), so it’s in the accusative case.

For masculine inanimate nouns like talerz, the nominative and accusative forms are identical:

  • Nominative (dictionary form): talerz – “a plate / the plate” as subject
    • Talerz stoi na stole. – The plate is on the table.
  • Accusative: talerz – “a plate / the plate” as object
    • On stawia talerz na stole. – He puts the plate on the table.

Forms like talerza, talerzem are other cases:

  • talerza – genitive (e.g. nie mam talerza – I don’t have a plate)
  • talerzem – instrumental (e.g. z talerzem w ręku – with a plate in his hand)
Why is it na stole and not na stół?

The preposition na can take two different cases, depending on meaning:

  1. na + accusative = motion onto something (change of location)

    • Kładę książkę na stół. – I put the book onto the table.
    • Wiesza płaszcz na wieszak. – He hangs the coat on the hanger.
  2. na + locative = location on something (where something is)

    • Książka leży na stole. – The book is lying on the table.
    • Płaszcz wisi na wieszaku. – The coat is hanging on the hanger.

Your sentence:

On stawia talerz na stole.

is slightly tricky: it describes an action, but focuses on the resulting place (the plate ends up on the table), so Polish commonly uses na + locative (na stole) here. You can sometimes hear na stół with verbs of putting, but na stole is very natural in this kind of everyday sentence.

So:

  • na stole – “on the table” (locative, static location focus)
  • na stół – “onto the table” (accusative, motion focus; more explicit about the movement)
What case is stole, and how is it formed from stół?

Stół (“table”) is a masculine noun.

In na stole, the word stole is in the locative case, singular:

  • Nominative (dictionary form): stół – “table” (subject)
  • Locative singular: (na) stole – “on the table”

Locative is mainly used after prepositions like na, w, o, po, przy, etc., when indicating location or talking “about” something.

So:

  • Stół jest duży. – The table is big. (nominative)
  • Na stole jest talerz. – There is a plate on the table. (locative after na)
Can I change the word order, like On na stole stawia talerz or Talerz on stawia na stole?

Yes. Polish word order is much more flexible than English, because meanings are marked by case endings, not by position in the sentence.

All of these are grammatically possible:

  • On stawia talerz na stole. – neutral, standard order.
  • On na stole stawia talerz. – slight emphasis that the action happens on the table.
  • Talerz on stawia na stole. – strong emphasis on talerz (“It is the plate that he puts on the table”).
  • Talerz na stole on stawia. – sounds stylized/poetic or very emphatic.

In everyday speech, the original order (On stawia talerz na stole.) is the most natural, neutral version.

Does stawia mean “he puts” or “he is putting”? How do you show continuous vs simple present in Polish?

Polish does not normally distinguish between simple present and present continuous the way English does.

Stawia can mean:

  • He puts (habitually, regularly)
  • He is putting (right now, in this moment)

Context tells you which is intended. For example:

  • Codziennie stawia talerz na stole. – He puts the plate on the table every day.
  • Teraz stawia talerz na stole. – He is putting the plate on the table now.

You don’t need a special continuous form. The same present tense covers both readings.

What is the infinitive and the perfective partner of stawia?

Stawia is:

  • 3rd person singular
  • present tense
  • imperfective aspect

The infinitive (imperfective) is:

  • stawiać – to put (upright), to place (repeated/ongoing)

Its perfective counterpart is:

  • postawić – to put (once, to complete the act of putting)

Examples:

  • On stawia talerz na stole. – He puts / is putting the plate on the table. (imperfective)
  • On postawił talerz na stole. – He put the plate on the table. (completed past action, perfective)
  • On postawi talerz na stole. – He will put the plate on the table. (future, perfective – single completed act)
Why are there no words for “a” or “the” in this sentence?

Polish has no articles like English a/an or the. The noun talerz by itself can mean:

  • a plate
  • the plate

Which one is meant depends on context, not on an extra word. For example:

  • On stawia talerz na stole.
    • may mean He is putting a plate on the table. (introducing it)
    • or He is putting the plate on the table. (both speaker and listener know which plate)

If you really need to be explicit, Polish can use other words:

  • jakiś talerz – some (unspecified) plate
  • ten talerz – this (specific) plate

But in many contexts, plain talerz is enough.

How do I say “He puts plates on the table” in Polish?

You mainly need to change talerz (singular) to talerze (plural accusative):

  • On stawia talerze na stole. – He puts plates on the table.

Notes:

  • talerze is the nominative plural and also accusative plural for inanimate masculine nouns like talerz.
  • stole stays the same; it’s still locative singular (“on the table”).
What does na mean here, and what other meanings can it have?

In this sentence:

On stawia talerz na stole.

na means “on” (indicating surface contact / location).

Common uses of na:

  • location on a surface (with locative)
    • na stole – on the table
    • na ścianie – on the wall
  • motion onto a surface (with accusative)
    • na stół – onto the table
    • na ścianę – onto the wall
  • at / in (some events or places) (with locative)
    • na uczelni – at university
    • na koncercie – at a concert
  • for (a purpose / time)
    • na obiad – for lunch
    • na godzinę – for an hour

So na is flexible; its exact meaning depends on context and the case of the noun that follows.

How do you pronounce stawia talerz na stole? Any tricky sounds for English speakers?

Approximate pronunciation (with English hints):

  • stawiaSTAH-vyah
    • s – like English s
    • t – like English t
    • w – like English v
    • ia – like ya in yard
  • talerzTAH-lesh (but the last sound is closer to the zh in measure)
    • rz – usually pronounced like a soft zh sound
  • nanah (short, open a)
  • stoleSTO-leh
    • st – like English st
    • o – like in more (but shorter)
    • e – like e in bed

Main challenges:

  • w is pronounced like English v.
  • rz is one sound, similar to zh, not r
    • z.
  • Vowels are generally short, clear, and not reduced like in English.