Mission—Team—FAQ—Privacy—Terms—Sponsors—Grammar—Typing Course—Donate

© 2026 Elon Automation B.V.

Learn Hardcore Polish: To rozdarcie jest duże. - This tear is large.

Hardcore Polish
/Swapping clothes with friends
/To rozdarcie jest duże.

To rozdarcie jest duże.

Word

To rozdarcie jest duże.

Meaning

This tear is large.

Part of speech

sentence

Pronunciation

Course

Hardcore Polish

Lesson

Swapping clothes with friends

Breakdown of To rozdarcie jest duże.

a tear in fabric

Questions & Answers about To rozdarcie jest duże.

What does to mean here?

Here to is the neuter singular demonstrative, meaning this or sometimes that, depending on context.

So to rozdarcie means this tear/rip.

It matches the noun rozdarcie, which is neuter. Compare:

ten for masculine nouns
ta for feminine nouns
to for neuter nouns

So the form to is used because rozdarcie is neuter.

Why is rozdarcie neuter?

Because rozdarcie is a neuter noun in Polish. One clue is its ending: many neuter nouns end in -e, -o, -ę, or forms like -cie.

You do not have to guess the gender only from the ending every time, but in this case the ending strongly suggests neuter, and the dictionary form confirms it.

That is why the other words around it also take neuter forms:

to
duże

Why is it duże and not duży or duża?

Elon.io is an online learning platform

We have an entire course teaching Polish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Polish now

Because Polish adjectives must agree with the noun in gender, number, and case.

Here the noun is:

singular
neuter
nominative

So the adjective must also be singular neuter nominative:

masculine: duży
feminine: duża
neuter: duże

Since rozdarcie is neuter, duże is the correct form.

What case is rozdarcie in?

It is in the nominative case.

In this sentence, rozdarcie is the subject: it is the thing being described. Subjects are normally in the nominative in Polish.

So:

to rozdarcie = the subject, nominative
jest duże = the description of that subject

What case is duże in?

It is also nominative singular neuter.

After jest with an adjective, Polish usually uses the adjective in the nominative:

Dom jest duży.
Kawa jest dobra.
Rozdarcie jest duże.

So duże agrees with rozdarcie in:

gender: neuter
number: singular
case: nominative

Why is jest used? Can it be omitted?

Jest is the present-tense form of być (to be) for he/she/it is.

In standard Polish, you normally keep it:

To rozdarcie jest duże.

Unlike in some other Slavic languages, Polish usually does not omit the present-tense copula in normal sentences.

You may sometimes see omission in:

headlines
notes
very informal or dramatic style

But for normal standard Polish, jest should be there.

Is the word order fixed?

The sentence is natural as written, but Polish word order is more flexible than English.

To rozdarcie jest duże is a neutral way to say it.

Other versions are possible, but they can change the emphasis:

Rozdarcie jest duże.
More like The tear is big / A tear is big, without pointing to this one.
To jest duże rozdarcie.
This means This is a big tear, which is a slightly different structure.
Duże jest to rozdarcie.
Grammatically possible, but marked and much less neutral.

So the original sentence is a good standard word order.

Why is there no word for a or the?

Because Polish has no articles.

English uses a/an and the, but Polish does not. Instead, Polish shows definiteness through:

context
word order
demonstratives like ten / ta / to
intonation in speech

So rozdarcie by itself does not tell you a tear vs the tear. Context does that. Adding to helps make it more specific: this tear.

How do you pronounce To rozdarcie jest duże?

A rough English-friendly guide would be:

to roz-DAR-che yest DOO-zhe

A few details:

to sounds roughly like toh
rozdarcie has the stress on DAR
jest sounds like yest
ż in duże sounds like the s in measure
duże is stressed on the first syllable: DU-że

As with most Polish words, the stress is usually on the second-to-last syllable.

What is the difference between to and tamto here?

Both can point to a specific thing, but they differ in distance or contrast.

to rozdarcie = this tear / sometimes that tear depending on context
tamto rozdarcie = that tear over there / that other tear

So if you are simply identifying the tear near you or already under discussion, to is natural. If you want to contrast it with another one farther away, tamto may be better.

Could I leave out to and just say Rozdarcie jest duże?

Yes, you can.

To rozdarcie jest duże. = This tear is big.
Rozdarcie jest duże. = The tear is big or A tear is big, depending on context

The version with to points to a specific tear. Without to, the sentence is more general or depends more heavily on context.

Does duże only mean physical size here?

Usually in a sentence like this, duże means that the tear/rip is large in size.

But Polish adjectives can also be figurative, depending on context. If rozdarcie is used metaphorically, duże could mean something like serious, deep, or significant.

So the grammar stays the same, but the exact nuance depends on what kind of rozdarcie is being talked about.

Your questions are stored by us to improve Elon.io