Breakdown of Zakres ochrony jest szeroki.
Questions & Answers about Zakres ochrony jest szeroki.
What is the grammatical role of each word in Zakres ochrony jest szeroki?
- zakres = the subject of the sentence; nominative singular, masculine inanimate
- ochrony = a dependent noun meaning of protection; genitive singular of ochrona
- jest = is; 3rd person singular present tense of być (to be)
- szeroki = an adjective meaning broad / wide; it agrees with zakres
So the structure is basically:
[subject] + [of-phrase] + [is] + [adjective]
Why is ochrony used, and not ochrona?
Because zakres normally takes the genitive when you mean the scope/range of something.
- zakres ochrony = scope of protection
- literally: scope of protection, not scope protection
The base form is ochrona.
Here it changes to ochrony, which is the genitive singular form.
This is very common in Polish: one noun is followed by another noun in the genitive to show a relationship like of X.
Examples:
- zakres prac = scope of work
- zakres obowiązków = scope of duties
- zakres usług = range/scope of services
What form is szeroki, and why is it not szeroka or szerokie?
Szeroki is masculine singular nominative.
It has that form because it agrees with zakres, and zakres is:
- masculine
- singular
- nominative
So:
- szeroki → masculine singular
- szeroka → feminine singular
- szerokie → neuter singular or non-masculine-personal plural
Examples:
- Droga jest szeroka. = The road is wide.
- Morze jest szerokie. = The sea is wide.
- Zakres jest szeroki. = The scope is broad.
Why is szeroki nominative? I thought words after jest often change case.
Great question. In Polish:
- a predicate adjective after być usually stays in the nominative
- a predicate noun often goes into the instrumental
So:
- Zakres jest szeroki. → adjective, so nominative
- Jan jest lekarzem. → noun, so instrumental
Compare:
- Ona jest miła. = She is nice.
- On jest zmęczony. = He is tired.
- On jest nauczycielem. = He is a teacher.
So szeroki is nominative because it is an adjective describing the subject.
Is jest necessary here, or can it be omitted?
In a normal full sentence, jest is the standard form:
Zakres ochrony jest szeroki.
In some styles, especially:
- headlines
- notes
- formal labels
- very compressed style
you may see the present-tense to be omitted:
Zakres ochrony szeroki.
But that is not the normal neutral sentence for everyday grammar practice. For a learner, it is best to use jest here.
Is the word order fixed?
The neutral, most standard order is:
Zakres ochrony jest szeroki.
But Polish word order is more flexible than English, because case endings show grammatical relationships.
Other orders are possible, for example:
- Szeroki jest zakres ochrony.
- Zakres ochrony szeroki jest. — possible, but marked and uncommon
These alternatives usually change the focus or emphasis, not the core meaning.
For learners, the safest version is the original one.
Why is there no word for the?
Because Polish does not have articles like English a / an / the.
So zakres ochrony can mean:
- the scope of protection
- a scope of protection
Which one is meant depends on context.
This is normal in Polish and something English speakers have to get used to.
How do I pronounce Zakres ochrony jest szeroki?
A rough pronunciation guide is:
ZAH-kres oh-HRO-nih yest sheh-RO-kee
A few important sound notes:
- rz in zakres sounds like a voiced Polish sound somewhat similar to the s in measure, but harder
- ch in ochrony sounds like the ch in German Bach or Scottish loch
- sz in szeroki sounds like sh, but with the tongue slightly farther back
- j in jest sounds like English y in yes
Stress: Polish stress is usually on the second-to-last syllable of a word:
- zaKRES
- oCHROny
- JEST (one syllable)
- szeROki
Could ochrony also be plural here?
Formally, ochrony can be more than one thing depending on context, because it can be:
- genitive singular of ochrona
- or nominative/accusative plural in some contexts
But in zakres ochrony, it is understood as genitive singular: scope of protection.
Why? Because zakres + genitive is a very common pattern, and that is what makes sense here.
Could I use another adjective instead of szeroki, like duży?
You sometimes could, but the meaning or style changes.
- szeroki = broad, wide, extensive
- duży = big, large
With abstract things like zakres, Polish often prefers szeroki, because it sounds more natural for scope/range.
So:
- zakres ochrony jest szeroki = very natural
- zakres ochrony jest duży = possible in some contexts, but less idiomatic
A good English parallel is that we naturally say broad scope more often than big scope.
Do I need to learn zakres ochrony as a chunk?
Yes, that is a very good idea.
Even though the grammar is explainable, zakres + genitive noun is a very common pattern in Polish. Learning it as a chunk will help you sound more natural.
Useful chunks:
That way you do not have to build the phrase from scratch every time.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning PolishMaster Polish — from Zakres ochrony jest szeroki to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions