Møtet har blitt flyttet til i morgen.

The meeting has been moved to tomorrow.

Breakdown of Møtet har blitt flyttet til i morgen.

• ha: to have
• til: to
• i morgen: tomorrow
• møtet: the meeting
• bli flyttet: to be moved

Questions & Answers about Møtet har blitt flyttet til i morgen.

What does the form har blitt express here?

It’s the present perfect passive. har (have) + blitt (past participle of bli) gives English-like has been, focusing on an action that has happened and is relevant now: the meeting has been moved (and this matters now).

Can I say Møtet er flyttet til i morgen or Møtet er blitt flyttet til i morgen instead?

Yes.

• er flyttet (statal passive) highlights the resulting state: the meeting is (now) moved.
• har blitt/er blitt flyttet (eventive passive) highlights the action of moving. In scheduling contexts, all three are common and usually interchangeable. Many speakers prefer the shorter er flyttet in announcements.

Can I use ble instead of har blitt?

Yes. ble flyttet = simple past passive, English-like was moved. Use it if you place the moving event in a specific past time (e.g., I går ble møtet flyttet). har blitt is used when the exact time isn’t specified or when the result is relevant now.

What’s the active-voice equivalent?

Examples:

• Vi har flyttet møtet til i morgen.
• Ledelsen har flyttet møtet til i morgen. Norwegian often uses the passive to avoid naming the agent.

Why is til used before i morgen? Could I use på or for?

With flytte meaning “reschedule/move,” you target a new time with til: flytte noe til [tid]. So: til i morgen.

• på is used in other time phrases (på mandag = on Monday) but not with the verb flytte when specifying a new time.
• for is not used for this meaning.
  Note: with other verbs, til i morgen can mean “until tomorrow” (e.g., vente til i morgen). Here, the meaning comes from the verb.

Is i morgen one or two words? Are there alternatives?

• Standard Bokmål: i morgen (two words).
• Nynorsk: i morgon.
• Colloquial speech: i morra (don’t use in formal writing). Avoid writing imorgen in standard Bokmål.

Why does it say Møtet with -et at the end?

Because møte is a neuter noun and this is the definite singular:

• Indefinite singular: et møte
• Definite singular: møtet
• Indefinite plural: møter
• Definite plural: møtene
  It’s capitalized only because it starts the sentence.

Does flyttet mean “postponed”? How is it different from utsatt?

• flytte (noe) = move/reschedule to a different time or place (earlier or later).
• utsette (noe) = postpone to a later time only.
  Both are fine; choose based on nuance. Møtet er utsatt til i morgen specifically frames it as a postponement.

Can I say flyttet på møtet?

You can, but it’s vaguer/softer (“moved it around”). When you specify a new time, prefer the direct form: flytte møtet til i morgen, not flytte på møtet til i morgen.

Why not har vært flyttet?

har vært flyttet (“has been in a moved state”) suggests a temporary past state that may no longer be true. To announce a current rescheduling, use har blitt flyttet or er flyttet.

What if I drop til and just say i morgen?

Different meaning:

• Møtet flyttes i morgen. = The act of moving happens tomorrow.
• Møtet flyttes til i morgen. = The new time is tomorrow.
  Keep til to express the target time.

Can I front the time phrase? What about word order?

Yes, but keep the verb in second position (V2):

• Neutral: Møtet har blitt flyttet til i morgen.
• Fronted: Til i morgen har møtet blitt flyttet.
  Also natural with the statal passive: Til i morgen er møtet flyttet.
  Fronting sounds more formal/emphatic; the neutral order is most common.

Does morgen mean “tomorrow” or “morning”?

Both, depending on context:

• i morgen = tomorrow (fixed expression).
• morgen as a noun = morning (e.g., i morgen tidlig = tomorrow morning; i morgen formiddag = late tomorrow morning).
  Don’t say i morgen morgen for “tomorrow morning.” Use i morgen tidlig.