Innfatningen er stram; med andre ord passer innfatningen ikke.

Breakdown of Innfatningen er stram; med andre ord passer innfatningen ikke.

være
to be
ikke
not
passe
to fit
stram
tight
innfatningen
the eyeglass frame
med andre ord
in other words

Questions & Answers about Innfatningen er stram; med andre ord passer innfatningen ikke.

What form is innfatningen?

Innfatningen is the definite singular form of en innfatning.

  • en innfatning = an edging, frame, setting, mounting, etc., depending on context
  • innfatningen = the edging/frame/setting

So the ending -en means the. This is very common in Norwegian: the definite article is usually attached to the noun itself.

Why is the adjective stram and not stramt or stramme?

Because stram agrees with a singular common-gender noun used as the subject.

Here the subject is innfatningen, which comes from en innfatning, so it is a common-gender singular noun. In predicate position after er, the adjective normally looks like this:

  • common gender singular: stram
  • neuter singular: stramt
  • plural: stramme

So:

  • Innfatningen er stram
  • Glasset er stramt
  • Skoene er stramme
What is med andre ord doing here?

Med andre ord is a fixed expression meaning in other words.

It is used to rephrase or explain what was just said. In this sentence, the second clause restates the first one more explicitly.

It functions as an introductory phrase at the start of the clause, which also affects word order.

Why is the word order passer innfatningen instead of innfatningen passer in the second clause?

This is because Norwegian main clauses follow the V2 rule: the finite verb must come in the second position.

In the second clause, med andre ord is placed first. That means the finite verb passer must come next, before the subject:

  • Med andre ord passer innfatningen ikke.

If the subject came first, then it would be:

  • Innfatningen passer ikke.

Both are correct, but the word order changes depending on what comes first in the sentence.

Why is ikke at the end of the clause?

In a Norwegian main clause, ikke usually comes after the finite verb and the subject.

Compare:

  • Innfatningen passer ikke.
  • Med andre ord passer innfatningen ikke.

In the second version, med andre ord takes first position, so the verb comes second, the subject comes after that, and then ikke follows.

So the structure is roughly:

  • first element
  • finite verb
  • subject
  • ikke

That is why ikke ends up at the end here.

What does passer mean here?

Here, passer is the present tense of å passe, and it means fits.

This verb can have several meanings in Norwegian, depending on context, such as:

  • fit
  • suit
  • match
  • look after / mind in some other constructions

In this sentence, it clearly means fit in a physical sense.

Could the second clause also be written as Innfatningen passer ikke?

Yes. That is a perfectly normal sentence.

  • Innfatningen passer ikke. = neutral word order
  • Med andre ord passer innfatningen ikke. = same basic meaning, but with in other words placed first as a discourse marker

So the version in your sentence is not a special grammar for passer; it is mostly the result of putting med andre ord first.

Why is innfatningen repeated instead of using den?

Norwegian often repeats nouns where English might prefer a pronoun.

So both of these are possible:

  • Med andre ord passer innfatningen ikke.
  • Med andre ord passer den ikke.

Repeating innfatningen makes the sentence slightly clearer and more explicit. Using den would also be natural if the reference is already obvious.

Is the semicolon normal here?

Yes. The semicolon is being used to connect two closely related independent clauses:

  • Innfatningen er stram
  • med andre ord passer innfatningen ikke

This is similar to English usage. A full stop would also be possible:

  • Innfatningen er stram. Med andre ord passer innfatningen ikke.

The semicolon just signals a particularly close connection between the two statements.

Would for stram be more natural than stram?

Often, yes. If you specifically want to say that something is too tight, for stram is more explicit.

Compare:

  • Innfatningen er stram. = the frame is tight
  • Innfatningen er for stram. = the frame is too tight

Without for, the sentence still works, especially if the next clause explains the consequence: it does not fit. But in many real-life situations, for stram would sound slightly more direct and natural if the idea is that the tightness is a problem.

AI Language TutorTry it ↗
Your avatar
“What's the best way to learn Norwegian grammar?”
Norwegian grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Norwegian

Master Norwegian — from Innfatningen er stram; med andre ord passer innfatningen ikke to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions