Breakdown of Originalemballasjen kreves ved tilbakeleveringen.
Questions & Answers about Originalemballasjen kreves ved tilbakeleveringen.
Why is originalemballasjen one long word?
Because Norwegian very often makes compound nouns by writing them as a single word.
So:
- original = original
- emballasje = packaging
- originalemballasje = original packaging
Then the definite ending is added:
- originalemballasjen = the original packaging
This is very normal in Norwegian. English often writes these as separate words, but Norwegian usually joins them.
Why does it say originalemballasjen and not just originalemballasje?
The ending -n makes the noun definite singular.
- en originalemballasje = an original packaging / the original packaging as a type
- originalemballasjen = the original packaging
In this sentence, the speaker means the specific packaging that belongs to the item being returned, so the definite form is natural.
What exactly is the form kreves?
Kreves is the verb kreve in the -s passive form.
- å kreve = to require
- krever = requires
- kreves = is required
So:
- Originalemballasjen kreves = The original packaging is required
Norwegian often uses this -s passive instead of a separate word like is plus a past participle.
Compare:
- Det kreves legitimasjon. = ID is required.
- Originalemballasjen kreves ved tilbakeleveringen. = The original packaging is required upon return.
Why isn’t there a separate word for is, like in English is required?
Because Norwegian can build the passive directly into the verb with -s.
English:
- is required
Norwegian:
- kreves
So the idea of is required is already included in kreves. This is one of the most important differences from English.
A more expanded Norwegian passive would be possible in some contexts, for example:
- Originalemballasjen er påkrevd ...
But kreves is very natural in formal notices and rules.
What does ved tilbakeleveringen mean literally?
Literally, it means something like:
- ved = at / upon / in connection with
- tilbakeleveringen = the return / the handing back
So:
- ved tilbakeleveringen = upon return, when it is returned, or at the time of return
It sounds slightly formal, which fits this kind of rule or policy statement.
Why is it tilbakeleveringen and not just tilbakelevering?
Again, this is the definite form.
- tilbakelevering = return / returning
- tilbakeleveringen = the return / the returning
The sentence is referring to a specific event: the return of the item in question. That is why the definite form is used.
This is very common in formal Norwegian, where English might also use a more general expression like upon return.
Is tilbakelevering a noun made from a verb?
Yes. It comes from the idea of returning something.
You can think of it as built from:
- tilbake = back
- levere = deliver / hand in / hand over
So tilbakelevere means to return / hand back, and tilbakelevering is the noun return / handing back.
Norwegian often forms nouns like this with -ing.
Examples:
- å bestille → bestilling = to order → order/ordering
- å betale → betaling = to pay → payment
- å tilbakelevere → tilbakelevering = to return → return/returning
Is this sentence formal?
Yes, it sounds fairly formal and administrative.
It is the kind of sentence you might see in:
- store policies
- rental agreements
- return instructions
- warranty terms
A less formal way to express a similar idea could be:
- Du må ha med originalemballasjen når du leverer den tilbake.
- You must bring the original packaging when you return it.
The original sentence is shorter and more impersonal, which is typical of formal written Norwegian.
Could ved be translated as by here?
Usually no, not naturally in English.
In this sentence, ved is better understood as:
- at
- upon
- when
- in connection with
So ved tilbakeleveringen is best translated as:
- upon return
- when returning it
- at the time of return
English by the return would sound unnatural here.
What is the word order doing here?
The sentence has a very straightforward Norwegian word order:
- Originalemballasjen = subject
- kreves = verb
- ved tilbakeleveringen = adverbial phrase
So it follows the common pattern:
- Subject + verb + other information
This makes it easy to read as a formal statement:
- The original packaging
- is required
- upon return
- is required
Could a Norwegian speaker also say this in another way?
Yes. Several alternatives are possible, depending on style.
For example:
Originalemballasje kreves ved tilbakelevering.
- Original packaging is required upon return.
- This sounds a bit more general.
Originalemballasjen må leveres tilbake sammen med varen.
- The original packaging must be returned together with the item.
Du må levere varen tilbake i originalemballasjen.
- You must return the item in the original packaging.
The version you were given is concise and typical of written rules or conditions.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning NorwegianMaster Norwegian — from Originalemballasjen kreves ved tilbakeleveringen to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions