Breakdown of Passasjerrettighetene gjelder også refusjonskravet.
Questions & Answers about Passasjerrettighetene gjelder også refusjonskravet.
Why are passasjerrettighetene and refusjonskravet written as single words?
Because Norwegian usually forms compound nouns by joining the parts into one word.
So:
- passasjerrettighetene = passasjer
- rettighetene
- refusjonskravet = refusjon
- kravet
This is very normal in Norwegian. English often writes similar ideas as separate words, but Norwegian usually does not.
A useful rule: in Norwegian compounds, the last part is the main noun, and that is the part that decides the gender and the definite ending.
How do I break down passasjerrettighetene?
It breaks down like this:
- passasjer = passenger
- rettighet = right
- -ene = the for a plural noun
So passasjerrettighetene means the passenger rights.
More literally, it is passenger-rights-the. That sounds strange in English, but it is standard Norwegian structure.
How do I break down refusjonskravet?
It breaks down like this:
- refusjon = refund / reimbursement
- krav = claim / demand
- -et = the for a singular neuter noun
So refusjonskravet means the refund claim or the reimbursement claim.
Because krav is a neuter noun, the definite singular form is kravet.
What does gjelder mean here?
Gjelder is the present tense of å gjelde.
In this sentence, it means something like:
- applies to
- concerns
- covers
The exact best translation depends on context, especially in legal or official language.
Why is there no separate word for the?
Because Norwegian usually adds the definite article to the end of the noun instead of putting a separate word in front.
So:
- rettigheter = rights
- rettighetene = the rights
and
- krav = claim
- kravet = the claim
This is one of the biggest structural differences from English.
Why is gjelder the same even though passasjerrettighetene is plural?
Because Norwegian verbs do not change form for singular and plural the way English verbs sometimes do.
So you get:
- rettigheten gjelder = the right applies
- rettighetene gjelder = the rights apply
The verb stays gjelder either way.
Why is også placed there?
Også means also.
In a normal Norwegian main clause, the finite verb usually comes early, and adverbs like også often come after it. So:
- Passasjerrettighetene gjelder også refusjonskravet.
This placement makes også connect naturally with what follows, so the idea is roughly the refund claim too.
If you move også, the emphasis can shift slightly.
Should there be a preposition like for before refusjonskravet?
Not necessarily. Å gjelde can often be used directly with what it applies to or concerns.
So a structure like this is possible:
- Dette gjelder alle passasjerer. = This applies to all passengers.
A version with for can also exist in Norwegian, depending on style and nuance:
- Dette gjelder for alle passasjerer.
As a general guide:
- without for often feels a bit more direct: concerns / covers / applies to
- with for can sound a bit more like is valid for
So the sentence as written is grammatical and natural.
What is the basic word order of the sentence?
The structure is:
- Passasjerrettighetene = subject
- gjelder = verb
- også = adverb
- refusjonskravet = object / thing affected
So it follows standard Norwegian main-clause word order:
subject + verb + adverb + object
That is a very common and useful pattern to recognize.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning NorwegianMaster Norwegian — from Passasjerrettighetene gjelder også refusjonskravet to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions