Avisen beskriver rettssaken.

Questions & Answers about Avisen beskriver rettssaken.

Why is there no separate word for the in this sentence?

In Norwegian, the is usually attached to the end of the noun instead of standing as a separate word.

So:

  • avis = newspaper
  • avisen = the newspaper

and

  • rettssak = trial / court case
  • rettssaken = the trial / the court case

This is one of the biggest differences from English. In a simple noun phrase, Norwegian often uses just the noun with a definite ending, not a separate word like the.

Why is it avisen and not avisa?

Because avis is a feminine noun in Bokmål, but Bokmål often allows two patterns for many feminine nouns:

  • feminine form: avisa
  • common/masculine-style form: avisen

Both can be correct in Bokmål. The sentence uses avisen, which is very common.

The same thing can happen with rettssak:

  • rettssaka
  • rettssaken

So this sentence is using a style that prefers -en rather than -a.

What form is beskriver?

Beskriver is the present tense of beskrive.

  • å beskrive = to describe
  • beskriver = describes / is describing

In Norwegian, the present tense is used for all persons:

  • jeg beskriver
  • du beskriver
  • han/hun beskriver
  • vi beskriver

So unlike English, the verb does not change depending on whether the subject is I, you, or the newspaper.

Why is there no å before beskriver?

Because å is used with the infinitive, not with a finite verb in a normal sentence.

  • å beskrive = to describe
  • beskriver = describes

So:

  • Avisen beskriver rettssaken. = a full sentence with a present-tense verb
  • å beskrive rettssaken = the infinitive phrase to describe the trial

A common English-speaking learner mistake is to expect å before every verb, but Norwegian only uses it where English uses to.

How do I know that avisen is the subject and rettssaken is the object?

Mostly from word order.

In this sentence, the pattern is:

subject + verb + object

  • Avisen = subject
  • beskriver = verb
  • rettssaken = object

So the sentence means that the newspaper is doing the describing, and the trial is what is being described.

Norwegian does not usually mark nouns with special case endings the way German does. Instead, word order is very important.

Is the word order here the same as in English?

Yes, in this sentence it is very similar to English:

  • Avisen beskriver rettssaken.
  • The newspaper describes the trial.

But Norwegian has an important rule called V2 word order in main clauses: the finite verb usually comes in the second position.

That means if you move something else to the front, the verb still stays second:

  • I dag beskriver avisen rettssaken. = Today, the newspaper describes the trial.

So the basic sentence looks English-like, but Norwegian word order becomes more obviously different when another element comes first.

Why is rettssaken one word?

Because Norwegian very often forms compound nouns as a single word.

Rettssak is made from parts that are connected into one noun, and then the definite ending is added:

  • rettssak = trial / court case
  • rettssaken = the trial / the court case

English often writes similar ideas as separate words, but Norwegian usually combines them.

This is very normal in Norwegian, and learners need to get used to long one-word compounds.

Why does rettssaken have double s?

This comes from how the compound is formed.

The word is built with a linking s, so when the parts come together, you get ss in spelling:

  • retts-
    • sak → rettssak

Then the definite ending is added:

  • rettssak → rettssaken

So the double s is not random; it is part of the compound structure.

Is this sentence active or passive?

It is active.

The subject, avisen, performs the action:

  • Avisen beskriver rettssaken.

A passive version would be something like:

  • Rettssaken beskrives av avisen.
  • Rettssaken blir beskrevet av avisen.

So the original sentence is the straightforward active form.

How would I say the same thing with indefinite nouns instead?

You would remove the definite endings and use indefinite articles where needed:

  • En avis beskriver en rettssak.

Because these nouns can be feminine in Bokmål, you may also see:

  • Ei avis beskriver ei rettssak.

So the contrast is:

  • avisen = the newspaper
  • en avis / ei avis = a newspaper

and

  • rettssaken = the trial
  • en rettssak / ei rettssak = a trial
Could den be used here, as in den avisen?

Not in the same simple way.

In ordinary Norwegian, if you just mean the newspaper, you normally say avisen, not den avisen.

Den avisen usually has a more specific or contrastive meaning, like:

  • that newspaper
  • that particular newspaper

Also, when an adjective is added, Norwegian often uses double definiteness:

But with no adjective and no special emphasis, avisen is the normal form.

AI Language TutorTry it ↗
Your avatar
“What's the best way to learn Norwegian grammar?”
Norwegian grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Norwegian

Master Norwegian — from Avisen beskriver rettssaken to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.

  • ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions