Questions & Answers about Han har dårlig samvittighet.
Why does Norwegian use har (has) here instead of is?
Because ha dårlig samvittighet is the normal Norwegian expression for to feel guilty or to have a guilty conscience.
So Norwegian says:
- Han har dårlig samvittighet. = He feels guilty / He has a bad conscience.
Using er would not work here:
- Han er dårlig samvittighet is incorrect.
This is one of those cases where Norwegian and English structure the idea differently.
What does samvittighet mean exactly?
Samvittighet means conscience.
It refers to your inner sense of right and wrong. In this sentence, dårlig samvittighet means something like:
- a guilty conscience
- feeling bad about something you did or failed to do
So the sentence is not saying that his conscience is literally poor in quality. It means he feels morally uneasy or guilty.
Why is there no article before dårlig samvittighet?
Because ha dårlig samvittighet is a very common fixed expression in Norwegian.
Norwegian often leaves out the article in set phrases with abstract nouns, especially after verbs like ha. So:
- Han har dårlig samvittighet. = natural, idiomatic
If you added an article:
- Han har en dårlig samvittighet.
that can sound less idiomatic in the usual feels guilty sense. It is not impossible, but the article-free version is the normal one when talking about guilt in general.
Why is it dårlig and not dårlige or dårligt?
Because dårlig is here in its basic adjective form, used before a singular indefinite noun.
The noun is:
- en samvittighet = a conscience
That is a common-gender singular noun, so the adjective normally stays in the basic form:
- dårlig samvittighet
Compare:
- en dårlig idé = a bad idea
- en dårlig vane = a bad habit
You would see other forms in other contexts, for example:
- et dårlig råd = a bad piece of advice
- dårlige vaner = bad habits
Is samvittighet a common-gender or neuter noun?
Is this sentence literal, or is it more idiomatic?
Can this sentence imply a specific reason for the guilt?
Yes, but the reason is not stated in the sentence itself.
Han har dårlig samvittighet. simply says that he feels guilty. The listener may already know why, or the reason may come later.
For example:
Han har dårlig samvittighet for det han sa.
He feels guilty about what he said.Hun har dårlig samvittighet fordi hun ikke ringte.
She feels guilty because she didn’t call.
So the basic sentence can stand alone, but it often invites the question about what?
How would I negate this sentence?
You negate it by putting ikke after the verb:
- Han har ikke dårlig samvittighet. = He does not feel guilty.
This follows standard Norwegian word order in main clauses:
- subject + verb + ikke
- rest
So:
- Han
- har
- ikke
- dårlig samvittighet
- ikke
- har
How would this change in a question?
In a yes/no question, the verb comes first:
- Har han dårlig samvittighet? = Does he feel guilty?
This is very common Norwegian word order for questions:
- Har du tid? = Do you have time?
- Er hun hjemme? = Is she at home?
So the sentence simply becomes inverted.
How is dårlig pronounced here?
A rough guide is:
- dårlig ≈ DOAR-lee
with å sounding like the vowel in British law for many learners
More specifically:
- då- has the Norwegian å sound
- -rlig can be tricky because of the Norwegian r
- l combination, and many speakers pronounce it in a way that may sound a bit reduced to learners
You do not need perfect pronunciation right away, but make sure:
- å is not pronounced like English a in bad
- the word has stress on the first syllable: DÅR-lig
How is samvittighet pronounced?
A rough learner-friendly approximation is:
- SAM-vit-ti-het
Stress is on the first syllable:
- SAM-vittighet
A few helpful points:
- tt makes the preceding vowel short
- the final -het sounds like heht, not English hate
- the whole word is longer than its English equivalent conscience, so it may take practice
If you say it slowly at first, that is completely fine:
- sam-vit-ti-het
Could I translate this as He is guilty?
Sometimes yes, but not always.
Han har dårlig samvittighet focuses on the feeling of guilt, not necessarily legal or factual guilt. So:
- He feels guilty is usually safest
- He has a guilty conscience is also very accurate
- He is guilty can be too strong or mean he actually committed the wrongdoing
For example, someone can ha dårlig samvittighet even if they only forgot to call a friend. That does not mean they are guilty in a legal or dramatic sense.
Are there similar expressions with ha in Norwegian that I should learn the same way?
Yes. Norwegian uses ha in many expressions that are best learned as whole chunks. For example:
- ha rett = be right
- ha lyst = feel like / want to
- ha behov for = need
- ha det travelt = be busy / be in a hurry
- ha dårlig tid = be short of time
So ha dårlig samvittighet is part of a larger pattern: Norwegian often says have where English might prefer be or some other structure.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning NorwegianMaster Norwegian — from Han har dårlig samvittighet to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions