Breakdown of Naulum et fenus magna sunt.
Questions & Answers about Naulum et fenus magna sunt.
Why is sunt plural when naulum and fenus each look singular?
Because naulum et fenus is a compound subject: naulum and fenus.
Even though each noun is singular by itself, together they make a plural idea, so Latin uses a plural verb:
- naulum = singular
- fenus = singular
- naulum et fenus = two things, so plural
That is why the sentence has sunt = are, not est = is.
Why is the adjective magna and not magnum?
For the same reason: the adjective is describing both nouns together, not just one of them.
Since naulum et fenus forms a plural subject, the predicate adjective must also be plural. And because both nouns are neuter, the adjective must be neuter plural:
- masculine plural: magni
- feminine plural: magnae
- neuter plural: magna
So magna sunt means are great/large/important with a neuter plural adjective.
What case are naulum and fenus in?
They are in the nominative case, because they are the subject of the sentence.
The basic structure is:
- naulum et fenus = the subject
- magna = predicate adjective
- sunt = verb
So the sentence is built as [subject] + [description] + [verb].
Why doesn’t magna match both nouns individually if one is from a different declension?
Because agreement in Latin is based on gender, number, and case, not on declension.
Here:
- naulum is neuter singular nominative
- fenus is neuter singular nominative
Together they form a neuter plural nominative idea, so the adjective becomes magna.
It does not matter that the nouns belong to different declensions. What matters is that together they are treated as plural neuter.
What exactly is magna doing here?
It is a predicate adjective.
A predicate adjective is an adjective linked to the subject by a form of to be. In English, this is like:
- The ships are large
- The costs are great
In Latin:
- Naulum et fenus magna sunt
Here magna is not directly attached to a noun inside a noun phrase; instead, it tells you something about the subject through the verb sunt.
Why is the adjective not placed right next to the nouns?
Because Latin word order is much freer than English word order.
English usually wants something like:
- Freight and interest are great
Latin can place words in different positions without changing the basic grammar, because the endings show how the words function.
So Naulum et fenus magna sunt is perfectly normal. The adjective does not have to stand right beside the nouns.
Could the sentence also be written in a different word order?
Yes. Latin often allows several word orders, for example:
- Naulum et fenus magna sunt
- Magna sunt naulum et fenus
- Naulum et fenus sunt magna
These all mean essentially the same thing, though the emphasis may shift a little.
The version you have is a straightforward and natural one.
Why is there no word for the?
Because Latin has no definite article and no indefinite article.
So Latin does not normally have separate words for:
- the
- a
- an
That means naulum can mean freight, the freight, or a freight charge, depending on context. The same is true for fenus.
What does et do here?
Et simply means and.
It links the two nouns:
- naulum et fenus = freight and interest
Because et joins them as two coordinated nouns, they become a plural subject.
Is fenus a normal second-declension neuter noun like bellum?
No. Even though fenus ends in -us, it is actually a neuter noun, not masculine.
This can surprise English-speaking learners, because -us often suggests a masculine noun such as dominus. But fenus is an exception and is traditionally treated as a neuter noun.
So in this sentence, fenus helps cause the adjective to be neuter plural: magna.
Is naulum also neuter?
Yes. Naulum is neuter as well.
So both nouns in the sentence are neuter:
- naulum = neuter
- fenus = neuter
That is why the predicate adjective is magna, the neuter plural form.
Why does Latin use the neuter plural magna instead of repeating the adjective for each noun?
Latin often uses one adjective for a coordinated pair when that adjective applies to both nouns together.
So instead of saying something like naulum magnum et fenus magnum, Latin can simply say:
- Naulum et fenus magna sunt
This is more compact and natural: one plural adjective describes both items together.
How literal is the sentence structure in English?
A very literal breakdown would be:
- Naulum = freight / passage money
- et = and
- fenus = interest / usury
- magna = great / large / important
- sunt = are
So, word-for-word:
- Freight and interest great are
But natural English puts the verb before the adjective:
- Freight and interest are great
How can I tell that magna is plural if it looks like the feminine singular form too?
This is a very common question. Magna can indeed be more than one thing, depending on context.
It can be:
- feminine singular nominative
- feminine singular ablative
- neuter plural nominative
- neuter plural accusative
In this sentence, the context tells you it must be neuter plural nominative, because it agrees with naulum et fenus, which together form a plural neuter subject.
So the verb and subject help you identify the form.
What is the main grammar lesson this sentence teaches?
The key lesson is this:
When two singular nouns are joined by et, they usually form a plural subject, so Latin uses:
- a plural verb
- and any predicate adjective must also agree appropriately
In this sentence:
- naulum et fenus = compound subject
- sunt = plural verb
- magna = neuter plural adjective agreeing with the combined subject
So the sentence is a good example of agreement with a compound subject.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Naulum et fenus magna sunt to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions