Breakdown of Puer sororem consolari conatur, quia illa lacrimat.
Questions & Answers about Puer sororem consolari conatur, quia illa lacrimat.
Why is sororem in the accusative case?
Because sororem is the direct object of consolari. The boy is trying to comfort his sister, so the sister is the person receiving the action.
- puer = subject, nominative, the boy
- sororem = direct object, accusative, the sister
This is very normal Latin syntax: the person or thing directly affected by the verb goes into the accusative.
Why is consolari an infinitive instead of a finite verb?
Because it depends on conatur.
The verb conor means try or attempt, and in Latin it is commonly followed by a complementary infinitive:
- conatur consolari = he tries to comfort
So consolari is not the main verb of the sentence. It completes the meaning of conatur, just as English to comfort completes tries.
Why do conatur and consolari look passive even though the meaning is active?
Because both conor and consolor are deponent verbs.
A deponent verb:
- has passive forms
- but an active meaning
So:
- conatur looks passive, but means he tries
- consolari looks passive, but means to comfort
This is one of the most important things to notice in this sentence. If you try to read them as ordinary passive forms, the sentence will not make sense.
What exactly is conatur?
Conatur is:
- 3rd person singular
- present tense
- indicative mood
- from the deponent verb conor, conari, conatus sum
So it means he tries or he is trying.
Because the subject is puer (singular), the verb is also singular.
Is consolari also from a deponent verb?
Yes. It comes from consolor, consolari, consolatus sum, a deponent verb meaning comfort or console.
Here consolari is the present infinitive, so:
- consolari = to comfort
Even though the form looks passive, the meaning is active because the verb is deponent.
Why doesn’t Latin use a separate word for to before consolari?
Because Latin infinitives do not need a separate word like English to.
In English:
- to comfort
In Latin:
- consolari
The infinitive ending itself already shows that the verb means to comfort. So Latin packs that idea into one word.
What is the function of quia here?
Quia means because. It introduces a clause giving the reason:
- quia illa lacrimat = because she is crying
So the sentence has:
- a main clause: Puer sororem consolari conatur
- a subordinate clause of reason: quia illa lacrimat
Why is illa used instead of ea?
Illa is the feminine singular form of ille, illa, illud. It can mean:
- that girl/woman
- she, often with some emphasis or contrast
Here it works like she, referring to the sister. Latin often uses a demonstrative pronoun like ille/illa where English would simply use a personal pronoun.
Using illa can make the reference a little clearer or more emphatic than a bare implied subject would.
How do we know illa refers to the sister?
Mostly from context.
- illa is feminine singular
- sororem is feminine singular
- the sentence naturally makes sense as The boy tries to comfort his sister, because she is crying
So the most likely referent is sororem.
Latin often relies on context like this. Grammatically, illa could refer to some other feminine person already known from the context, but in this standalone sentence the sister is the obvious reference.
Why is lacrimat in the present tense?
It is present because the crying is happening at the same time as the trying:
- conatur = is trying / tries
- lacrimat = is crying / cries
Latin present tense can often be translated either as simple present or progressive present in English, depending on context.
So lacrimat could be understood as:
- she cries
- she is crying
Here she is crying usually sounds more natural in English.
Is there anything important about the word order?
Yes, but it is not rigid.
Latin word order is flexible because endings show grammatical roles. Here the order is:
- Puer = subject
- sororem = object
- consolari = infinitive
- conatur = main verb
- quia illa lacrimat = reason clause
A very literal pattern would be:
- The boy his sister to comfort tries, because she cries
That sounds odd in English, but it is perfectly natural in Latin.
Also, putting conatur after consolari is common, since the infinitive and its governing verb often stay close together.
Could the subject of consolari be someone other than puer?
Normally no. With conor + infinitive, the subject of the infinitive is usually the same as the subject of conor unless Latin clearly says otherwise.
So here:
- puer is the one who conatur
- therefore puer is also the one who consolari
In other words, the boy tries to comfort, not the boy tries for someone else to comfort.
What are the dictionary forms of the main words in this sentence?
Here are the main forms a learner would want:
- puer, pueri = boy
- soror, sororis = sister
- conor, conari, conatus sum = try
- consolor, consolari, consolatus sum = comfort, console
- quia = because
- ille, illa, illud = that; he, she, it
- lacrimo, lacrimare, lacrimavi, lacrimatus (or sometimes with slightly different principal parts in dictionaries) = cry, weep
Notice again that conor and consolor are deponent, so their principal parts include forms that look passive.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Puer sororem consolari conatur, quia illa lacrimat to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions