Breakdown of Hic liber multa verba nova continet.
Questions & Answers about Hic liber multa verba nova continet.
Why is hic translated as this here, and not here?
In this sentence, hic is a demonstrative adjective, meaning this.
It agrees with liber (book) in:
- gender: masculine
- number: singular
- case: nominative
So hic liber means this book.
Latin also has a word hic meaning here, but that is an adverb, not an adjective. You can tell which one it is from the sentence structure:
- hic liber = this book
- if it meant here, it would not be directly modifying liber in this way
Why is it hic liber and not hoc liber?
Because liber is a masculine noun, and hic has to match it.
The demonstrative hic, haec, hoc means:
- hic = masculine
- haec = feminine
- hoc = neuter
Since liber is masculine, Latin uses hic:
- hic liber = this book
If the noun were neuter, then hoc would be used instead.
What case is liber, and how do we know?
Liber is nominative singular.
We know this because it is the subject of the sentence: the book is the thing doing the action of containing.
So the basic structure is:
- hic liber = subject
- continet = verb
- multa verba nova = direct object
Since the subject of a Latin sentence is normally in the nominative case, liber is nominative singular.
Why are verba, multa, and nova all ending in -a?
Because they all go together, and they are all neuter plural accusative.
Here is the breakdown:
- verba = words
- multa = many
- nova = new
These three words form the object phrase multa verba nova = many new words.
Why -a?
- verbum is a second-declension neuter noun
- neuter plural nominative and accusative forms often end in -a
- adjectives must agree with the noun they describe
So:
- verba = neuter plural accusative
- multa agrees with verba
- nova also agrees with verba
That is why all three have the same ending here.
Why is it multa verba and not multi verba?
Because verba is neuter plural, and the adjective must match it.
The adjective multus, multa, multum means many / much. Its form changes depending on gender, number, and case.
Here we need:
- neuter
- plural
- accusative
That form is multa.
So:
- multi would be masculine plural
- multae would be feminine plural
- multa is the correct neuter plural form
Since verba is neuter plural, multa verba is correct.
Why is nova after verba? Shouldn’t the adjective come before the noun?
In Latin, adjective position is much freer than in English.
English strongly prefers:
- new words
Latin can say:
- nova verba
- verba nova
Both are normal.
So multa verba nova is perfectly natural Latin. The adjective nova still clearly modifies verba, because its ending shows agreement.
Latin relies more on endings than on strict word order.
What form is continet, and what does it tell us?
Continet is:
- present tense
- third person singular
- from the verb continere
It means he/she/it contains or simply contains.
Why singular? Because the subject is hic liber = this book, which is singular.
So:
- liber continet = the book contains
If the subject were plural, the verb would also be plural.
Why is there no word for a or the in the Latin sentence?
Latin does not have articles like English a, an, and the.
So a noun like liber can mean:
- a book
- the book
- just book
The context tells you which is most natural.
In this sentence, hic already makes the noun definite:
- hic liber = this book
So Latin does not need a separate word for the.
How do we know that multa verba nova is the object of the sentence?
We know because:
- Continet is a transitive verb, so it can take a direct object.
- Verba is in the accusative plural.
- The accusative case is commonly used for the direct object.
So the sentence breaks down like this:
- hic liber = subject
- continet = verb
- multa verba nova = direct object
In other words, this book is doing the containing, and many new words are what it contains.
Does multa mean many or much here?
Here it means many.
That is because it is describing verba, which is a plural count noun: words.
So:
- many words = multa verba
If it were used with something understood as uncountable, it could mean much instead. But with verba, the natural meaning is clearly many.
Can the word order be changed and still mean the same thing?
Yes, often it can.
Because Latin uses case endings, the sentence can be rearranged more freely than in English. For example, these would still basically mean the same thing:
- Hic liber multa verba nova continet.
- Hic liber continet multa verba nova.
- Multa verba nova hic liber continet.
The main meaning stays the same because the endings show the grammar.
However, changing the word order can slightly change the emphasis:
- putting multa verba nova earlier can emphasize the words
- putting continet at the end is a very common Latin style
Is hic liber just this book, or could it mean something like this here book?
Normally it just means this book.
The word hic is enough by itself to point something out. Latin does not need an extra word like English sometimes uses for emphasis, as in this here book.
So in ordinary translation:
- hic liber = this book
If the context is especially emphatic, you might bring that out in English, but the basic meaning is simply this book.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Hic liber multa verba nova continet to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions