Breakdown of Post cenam lente ambulatur, quia ambulatio brevis corpori salubris est.
Questions & Answers about Post cenam lente ambulatur, quia ambulatio brevis corpori salubris est.
Why is cenam in the accusative case after post?
Because post is a preposition that takes the accusative when it means after.
So:
- cena = dinner
- cenam = after dinner when used with post
This is very common in Latin:
- post cenam = after dinner
- post bellum = after the war
- post paucos dies = after a few days
So the accusative here is required by the preposition, not because cenam is a direct object.
What exactly does ambulatur mean here?
Ambulatur is the 3rd person singular present passive form of ambulare.
Literally, it looks like is walked, but here it is being used as an impersonal passive, which is very common in Latin. In English we usually translate this kind of form as:
- one walks
- people walk
- there is walking
So lente ambulatur means something like:
- one walks slowly
- people walk slowly
- there is slow walking
It does not mean that some specific thing is being walked.
Why does Latin use a passive form like ambulatur when the meaning is active in English?
This is because Latin often uses the impersonal passive to express a general action without naming a subject.
English often uses:
- one
- people
- you in a general sense
Latin can instead use a passive verb in the 3rd person singular:
- pugnatur = people fight / there is fighting
- curritur = people run / there is running
- ambulatur = people walk / one walks
So this is a normal Latin way to make a general statement like After dinner, people walk slowly.
Why is lente used instead of lenta?
Because lente is an adverb, while lenta would be an adjective.
Here the sentence is describing how the walking happens:
- lente = slowly
It is modifying the verb ambulatur, not a noun.
Compare:
- vir lentus ambulat = the slow man walks
- lentus describes vir
- vir lente ambulat = the man walks slowly
- lente describes ambulat
So lente is correct because the sentence needs an adverb.
What is the difference between ambulatur and ambulatio?
They come from the same root idea, but they are different parts of speech:
- ambulatur = a verb: one walks / people walk
- ambulatio = a noun: a walk, walking, a прогулation-like activity
In this sentence:
- ambulatur tells you that the action is happening
- ambulatio brevis names the activity itself: a short walk
So Latin is using both the verb and the related noun:
- Post cenam lente ambulatur = After dinner, people walk slowly
- quia ambulatio brevis corpori salubris est = because a short walk is healthy for the body
Why are ambulatio and brevis both in the nominative?
Because ambulatio brevis is the subject of est.
The phrase means:
- ambulatio = walk
- brevis = short
Since brevis describes ambulatio, it agrees with it in:
- case: nominative
- number: singular
- gender: feminine
So:
- ambulatio brevis = a short walk
They are nominative because this phrase is the thing being talked about in ambulatio brevis corpori salubris est.
Why is salubris also nominative?
Because salubris is a predicate adjective linked to ambulatio brevis by est.
In other words:
- ambulatio brevis = subject
- salubris est = is healthy / is beneficial
So salubris must agree with ambulatio:
- nominative
- singular
- feminine
This is just like:
- puella laeta est = the girl is happy
- ambulatio brevis salubris est = a short walk is healthy
Even though English uses healthy for the body, Latin keeps salubris in the nominative because it describes the subject, not corpori.
Why is corpori dative?
Corpori is the dative singular of corpus, meaning body.
Here it is used with salubris to mean:
- healthy for the body
- beneficial to the body
So:
- corpus = body
- corpori = to/for the body
This is a common use of the dative with adjectives that express suitability, advantage, usefulness, or harm.
So the structure is:
- ambulatio brevis corpori salubris est
- literally: a short walk is beneficial to the body
Does salubris mean healthy or healthful?
In strict English, healthy usually describes something that has health, while healthful describes something that promotes health. But in normal English, healthy is often used for both.
Latin salubris usually means:
- health-giving
- beneficial
- good for the health
- often simply healthy in translation
So here corpori salubris est means:
- is good for the body
- is beneficial to the body
- is healthy for the body
Why is there no expressed subject like homines or nos with ambulatur?
Because the verb is impersonal.
Latin does not need to say people or we here. The form ambulatur itself already gives the idea of a general, unnamed subject:
- one walks
- people walk
If Latin wanted to name a subject, it would normally use an active form instead, such as:
- homines lente ambulant = people walk slowly
But with ambulatur, the sentence stays more general and impersonal.
What does quia do in the sentence?
Quia means because and introduces a clause giving the reason.
So the sentence is in two parts:
- Post cenam lente ambulatur
- quia ambulatio brevis corpori salubris est
That means:
- After dinner, people walk slowly
- because a short walk is beneficial to the body
So quia connects the action with its explanation.
Is the word order important here? Could the sentence be arranged differently?
Latin word order is much more flexible than English word order because the endings show the grammatical relationships.
This sentence could be rearranged in several ways without changing the basic meaning, for example:
- Lente post cenam ambulatur, quia ambulatio brevis corpori salubris est.
- Post cenam ambulatur lente, quia corpori salubris est ambulatio brevis.
The original order is natural and clear:
- post cenam first sets the time
- lente comes before the verb and highlights the manner
- the reason clause follows after quia
So the word order helps emphasis and style, but the endings carry most of the grammar.
Is post cenam just a phrase meaning after dinner, or is there anything else to notice about it?
It is a standard prepositional phrase meaning after dinner, but it is also worth noticing that Latin often uses very simple time expressions like this without extra words.
English might say:
- after dinner
- after the meal
- once dinner is over
Latin can simply say:
- post cenam
So it is compact and idiomatic. A learner should get used to these short preposition + accusative time phrases.
Why does Latin say ambulatio brevis instead of using an infinitive, like ambulare?
Latin often uses either a noun or an infinitive, depending on the construction.
Here the sentence wants the idea a short walk as a concrete thing that can be described as beneficial. A noun phrase works very naturally:
- ambulatio brevis = a short walk
An infinitive like ambulare means to walk or walking in a more verbal sense. But brevis naturally describes a noun, so ambulatio brevis is the clearer choice for a short walk.
So Latin is treating the activity as a thing:
- a short walk is good for the body
rather than just the bare action to walk.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Post cenam lente ambulatur, quia ambulatio brevis corpori salubris est to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions