Breakdown of Plerique viatores ob gelu domi manent, sed nostra familia proficiscitur.
Questions & Answers about Plerique viatores ob gelu domi manent, sed nostra familia proficiscitur.
Why is plerique used here, and what form is it?
Plerique means most or very many. It is an adjective/pronominal word that is usually found in the plural, because it refers to most members of a group.
Here it agrees with viatores:
- plerique = nominative masculine plural
- viatores = nominative masculine plural
So plerique viatores means most travelers.
A learner might expect something simpler like multi viatores (many travelers), but plerique is stronger: it means most rather than just many.
Why is viatores in that form?
Viatores is nominative plural, because it is the subject of manent.
Its dictionary form is viator, viatoris (traveler).
The nominative plural of this 3rd-declension noun is viatores.
So:
- viatores manent = the travelers stay/remain
Since plerique describes viatores, both are in the same case and number.
What does ob gelu mean, and why is ob used?
Ob is a preposition meaning because of, on account of, or sometimes in view of.
It takes the accusative case, so gelu here is the object of ob:
- ob gelu = because of the frost/cold
A native English speaker may expect a word like because followed by a clause, but Latin often uses a preposition + noun instead:
- ob gelu = because of the frost
- compare English because of the frost
Latin could also use other expressions for cause, but ob + accusative is a very normal one.
Why is it gelu and not gelum?
Because gelu is a neuter fourth-declension noun.
Its nominative and accusative singular are both gelu, not gelum.
So even though ob takes the accusative, the form is still:
- nominative singular: gelu
- accusative singular: gelu
This can look strange if you are expecting a regular second-declension neuter ending like -um, but gelu belongs to a different declension.
What is domi, and why is there no preposition before it?
Domi means at home.
It is a special locative form of domus (home, house). The locative is an old case used mainly for place where, especially with words for cities, towns, and a few special nouns such as domus.
So Latin says:
- domi = at home
without needing a preposition like in.
This is one of those forms that learners usually just memorize:
- domi = at home
- compare Romae = at Rome / in Rome
Why does Latin use manent here? Does it mean remain or stay?
It can mean both. Maneo, manere basically means remain, stay, or continue to be in a place.
So in this sentence, manent is naturally understood as:
- they stay home
- or more literally, they remain at home
Form:
- manent = 3rd person plural present active indicative
It matches the plural subject plerique viatores.
Why is it nostra familia and not something plural like nostri?
Because familia is a singular noun in Latin.
Even though a family contains several people, Latin treats familia grammatically as one unit, just as English usually does in American English:
- our family is leaving
So:
- nostra = nominative feminine singular
- familia = nominative feminine singular
They agree with each other.
Why is proficiscitur singular?
Because its subject is nostra familia, which is singular.
Even though the family has many members in real life, the grammatical subject is still one singular noun:
- familia proficiscitur = the family sets out / departs
So the verb must also be singular:
- proficiscitur = 3rd person singular
Why does proficiscitur look passive if the meaning is active?
Because proficiscor, proficisci is a deponent verb.
Deponent verbs use passive-looking forms but have active meanings.
So:
- proficiscitur looks like a passive form
- but it means he/she/it sets out, departs, leaves
This is very common in Latin and often confuses beginners.
Some common deponent verbs are:
- loquitur = he/she speaks
- sequitur = he/she follows
- proficiscitur = he/she sets out
So in this sentence, nostra familia proficiscitur means our family sets out, not is set out.
What exactly does proficiscitur mean here?
It means something like sets out, starts off, departs, or goes on a journey.
Because the subject is a family and the first part of the sentence mentions travelers, the sense is probably:
- our family sets out anyway
- our family leaves
- our family goes off on its journey
So it is not just a vague goes. It has the idea of beginning a journey or departing.
Why is there a comma before sed?
Because sed means but, and it introduces a contrast between two clauses:
- Plerique viatores ob gelu domi manent
- sed nostra familia proficiscitur
The contrast is:
- most travelers stay home because of the frost
- but our family sets out
The comma helps show that contrast clearly. Latin punctuation in ancient manuscripts was not standardized the way modern punctuation is, but in modern printed Latin this comma is perfectly normal.
Is the word order important here? Could the words be arranged differently?
Latin word order is more flexible than English word order because the endings show each word’s function.
This sentence could be rearranged in various ways without changing the basic meaning, for example:
- Ob gelu plerique viatores domi manent, sed nostra familia proficiscitur.
- Plerique ob gelu viatores domi manent, sed nostra familia proficiscitur.
However, the given order is natural and clear:
- Plerique viatores first introduces the main group
- ob gelu gives the reason
- domi manent finishes the idea
- sed then marks the contrast
- nostra familia proficiscitur gives the surprising opposite action
So the word order is not random; it helps shape emphasis and flow.
Why doesn’t Latin use a word for the or a here?
Because Latin has no articles like English the and a/an.
So:
- viatores can mean travelers, the travelers, or sometimes some travelers, depending on context
- familia can mean family or the family
In this sentence, English naturally supplies the sense from context:
- most travelers
- our family
This is very normal in Latin. The language usually does not need an article to be clear.
Could viatores include women too, or is it only masculine?
In many contexts, a masculine plural noun in Latin can refer to a mixed group or to people in general.
So viatores here can easily mean travelers in a general sense, not necessarily only male travelers.
A native English speaker may wonder about this because English usually avoids marking gender in nouns like traveler, but Latin often uses the masculine plural as the default for a mixed or unspecified group.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Plerique viatores ob gelu domi manent, sed nostra familia proficiscitur to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions