Breakdown of Servus lucernam accendere debet, ut domina in atrio epistulam legere possit.
Questions & Answers about Servus lucernam accendere debet, ut domina in atrio epistulam legere possit.
Why is servus in the nominative, and what role does it play in the sentence?
Why is lucernam in the accusative?
How does debet work with an infinitive like accendere?
Debet is a “modal” verb meaning must/ought and it commonly takes a complementary infinitive:
- debet accendere = he must light So the main clause structure is: Servus (subject) + lucernam accendere (infinitive phrase) + debet (finite verb).
Why is the verb debet at the end of the main clause? Is that required?
What does ut mean here, and what kind of clause is ut domina ... possit?
Here ut introduces a purpose clause (a clause of intention):
ut domina ... possit = so that the mistress may/can ...
It expresses the intended result of the slave lighting the lamp.
Why is possit subjunctive instead of indicative potest?
Because after ut in a purpose clause, Latin uses the subjunctive mood.
So:
- Purpose: ut ... possit (subjunctive) = so that she can/may
- Simple statement (not purpose): domina ... potest (indicative) = the mistress can
Why is possit present subjunctive, and what time does it refer to?
The present subjunctive in a purpose clause usually shows an action that is contemporaneous with or subsequent to the main verb.
Here, the lamp is lit (main clause) so that the mistress can read afterward / as a result. Present subjunctive fits that relationship.
What is the function of legere after possit?
Legere is an infinitive that completes the meaning of possit (just like English can read).
So the subordinate clause core is:
- domina ... possit legere = the mistress can/may read
Why is domina nominative, and how do I know it’s the subject of possit?
Domina is nominative singular because it is the subject of the verb possit inside the ut-clause.
Even though it’s not at the start of the clause, the nominative ending and the verb form help you identify it.
Why is in atrio ablative, and what does in mean with the ablative?
With in:
- in + ablative = location (in/on a place)
- in + accusative = motion into (into a place)
So in atrio (ablative) means in the atrium (location), not into the atrium.
Why is epistulam accusative, and does its position matter?
Epistulam is accusative singular because it is the direct object of legere (to read).
Its placement before legere is common, but not required. Latin could also say legere epistulam without changing the basic meaning.
Could the sentence be rearranged (for example ut domina epistulam possit legere in atrio), and would it still be correct?
Yes. Many rearrangements are grammatically correct because the case endings and verb forms keep roles clear. For example:
- Servus debet lucernam accendere, ut domina epistulam in atrio legere possit.
- ... ut domina in atrio possit epistulam legere. These would still mean essentially the same thing, though emphasis and style may shift slightly depending on what you place first or last.
More from this lesson
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning LatinMaster Latin — from Servus lucernam accendere debet, ut domina in atrio epistulam legere possit to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.
- ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions