Log inSign up

Servus lucernam accendere debet, ut domina in atrio epistulam legere possit.

Servus lucernam accendere debet, ut domina in atrio epistulam legere possit.
The servant must light the lamp so that the mistress can read a letter in the atrium.
FromLesson 12inHardcore Latin
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Latin grammar?”
Latin grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Latin

Master Latin — from Servus lucernam accendere debet, ut domina in atrio epistulam legere possit to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.

  • ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Latin freeBrowse the full course

More from this lesson

navisportusNavis in portu stat.exireNoli foris exire, quia nox obscura est.Nauta navem parat ut cras e portu exeat.duocivis

Questions & Answers about Servus lucernam accendere debet, ut domina in atrio epistulam legere possit.

Why is servus in the nominative, and what role does it play in the sentence?
Servus is nominative singular because it is the subject of the main verb debet (he must/ought). So servus = the slave/servant who has the obligation.
Why is lucernam in the accusative?
Lucernam is accusative singular because it is the direct object of accendere (to light). The action of lighting is done to the lamp: lucernam accendere = to light the lamp.
How does debet work with an infinitive like accendere?

Debet is a “modal” verb meaning must/ought and it commonly takes a complementary infinitive:

  • debet accendere = he must light So the main clause structure is: Servus (subject) + lucernam accendere (infinitive phrase) + debet (finite verb).
Why is the verb debet at the end of the main clause? Is that required?
It’s not required, but it’s very common Latin style. Latin word order is flexible because endings show grammatical roles. Putting the finite verb (debet) late in the clause is typical and often sounds more natural in Latin prose.
What does ut mean here, and what kind of clause is ut domina ... possit?

Here ut introduces a purpose clause (a clause of intention):
ut domina ... possit = so that the mistress may/can ...
It expresses the intended result of the slave lighting the lamp.

Why is possit subjunctive instead of indicative potest?

Because after ut in a purpose clause, Latin uses the subjunctive mood.
So:

  • Purpose: ut ... possit (subjunctive) = so that she can/may
  • Simple statement (not purpose): domina ... potest (indicative) = the mistress can
Why is possit present subjunctive, and what time does it refer to?

The present subjunctive in a purpose clause usually shows an action that is contemporaneous with or subsequent to the main verb.
Here, the lamp is lit (main clause) so that the mistress can read afterward / as a result. Present subjunctive fits that relationship.

What is the function of legere after possit?

Legere is an infinitive that completes the meaning of possit (just like English can read).
So the subordinate clause core is:

  • domina ... possit legere = the mistress can/may read
Why is domina nominative, and how do I know it’s the subject of possit?

Domina is nominative singular because it is the subject of the verb possit inside the ut-clause.
Even though it’s not at the start of the clause, the nominative ending and the verb form help you identify it.

Why is in atrio ablative, and what does in mean with the ablative?

With in:

  • in + ablative = location (in/on a place)
  • in + accusative = motion into (into a place)

So in atrio (ablative) means in the atrium (location), not into the atrium.

Why is epistulam accusative, and does its position matter?

Epistulam is accusative singular because it is the direct object of legere (to read).
Its placement before legere is common, but not required. Latin could also say legere epistulam without changing the basic meaning.

Could the sentence be rearranged (for example ut domina epistulam possit legere in atrio), and would it still be correct?

Yes. Many rearrangements are grammatically correct because the case endings and verb forms keep roles clear. For example:

  • Servus debet lucernam accendere, ut domina epistulam in atrio legere possit.
  • ... ut domina in atrio possit epistulam legere. These would still mean essentially the same thing, though emphasis and style may shift slightly depending on what you place first or last.