Log inSign up

Hospes in villa manet, quia pluvia frigida cadit.

Hospes in villa manet, quia pluvia frigida cadit.
The guest stays in the villa, because cold rain is falling.
FromLesson 11inHardcore Latin

Breakdown of Hospes in villa manet, quia pluvia frigida cadit.

in
in
villa
the villa
manere
to stay
quia
because
frigidus
cold
pluvia
the rain
cadere
to fall
hospes
guest
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Latin grammar?”
Latin grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Latin

Master Latin — from Hospes in villa manet, quia pluvia frigida cadit to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.

  • ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Latin freeBrowse the full course

More from this lesson

prandiumdomiDomi tacemus, ut aviam audire possimus.theatrumPrandium breve domi sumimus, deinde ad theatrum festinamus.turbaapertusIanua aperta est, et hospes intrat.

Questions & Answers about Hospes in villa manet, quia pluvia frigida cadit.

Why does hospes mean “guest” here, and what case is it in?

Hospes is a 3rd-declension noun that can mean guest, host, or more generally stranger/foreigner, depending on context. Here it’s the subject of the sentence, so it’s in the nominative singular.

What tense/person is manet, and how do I know?

Manet is present tense, 3rd person singular, from manēre (“to remain/stay”). The ending -t typically marks he/she/it in the present tense: manet = “(he/she/it) stays.”

Why is the word order Hospes in villa manet instead of something more “English-like”?

Latin word order is flexible because endings show grammatical roles. A very common pattern is:

  • Subject (hospes)
  • then important phrases like location (in villa)
  • then the verb (manet)
    Placing the verb near the end is especially common, though not required.
Why is it in villa and not in villam?

Because in changes meaning depending on the case:

  • in + ablative = location (“in/on” where something is) → in villā = “in the house/villa”
  • in + accusative = motion into (“into/onto”) → in villam = “into the villa”
    Here the guest is staying (no motion), so ablative: villā.
What case is villa, and what does that case express?

Villā is ablative singular of villa. With in, the ablative expresses place where (location).

What is quia doing, and how does it affect the sentence?

Quia means because and introduces a causal subordinate clause. It doesn’t force the subjunctive here; with quia, Latin commonly uses the indicative when stating a straightforward reason: quia … cadit.

Why is there a comma before quia?

The comma is a modern punctuation convention to mark the start of a subordinate clause (quia pluvia…). Ancient Latin manuscripts had little/no punctuation, but in modern textbooks the comma helps readability.

What case is pluvia, and why?

Pluvia is nominative singular, and it is the subject of the subordinate clause quia pluvia frigida cadit.

How does frigida relate to pluvia?

Frigida is an adjective modifying pluvia, and it agrees with it in case, number, and gender:

  • pluvia = nominative singular feminine
  • frigida = nominative singular feminine
    So pluvia frigida = “cold rain.”
What tense/person is cadit, and what verb is it from?

Cadit is present tense, 3rd person singular, from cadere (“to fall”). Again, the -t ending marks 3rd singular: “(it) falls.”

Could Latin omit the subjects here, like dropping “he” or “it” in English?

Yes. Latin often omits subject pronouns because the verb ending already shows the person/number. Here, though, the nouns hospes and pluvia are included for clarity and emphasis (we need to know who/what is staying and what is falling).

Is villa just “house,” or specifically a “villa” in the Roman sense?
Villa can be translated as “house,” but it often suggests a country house/estate/farm in Roman context. In beginner sentences it’s often simplified as “house,” but culturally it can imply a larger rural property.