Log inSign up

Servus in culina manet, ut cenam finire possit.

Servus in culina manet, ut cenam finire possit.
The servant stays in the kitchen so that he can finish the dinner.
FromLesson 11inHardcore Latin
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Latin grammar?”
Latin grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Latin

Master Latin — from Servus in culina manet, ut cenam finire possit to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.

  • ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Latin freeBrowse the full course

More from this lesson

prandiumdomiDomi tacemus, ut aviam audire possimus.theatrumPrandium breve domi sumimus, deinde ad theatrum festinamus.turbaapertusIanua aperta est, et hospes intrat.

Questions & Answers about Servus in culina manet, ut cenam finire possit.

Why is servus in the nominative case here?
Servus is the subject of the main verb manet (stays/remains). In Latin, the subject of a finite verb is typically in the nominative case, so servus is nominative singular: the slave.
What case is in culina, and why?

In culina uses in + ablative to express location (in/inside/on in the sense of “where?”).

  • culina is ablative singular of culina, -ae (f.) kitchen.
    If Latin wanted motion toward (the question “where to?”), it would often use in + accusative instead.
How can I tell whether in takes the ablative or the accusative?

A common rule:

  • in + ablative = location (where?) → in culina = in the kitchen
  • in + accusative = motion toward (where to?) → in culinam = into the kitchen
    This sentence is about staying in a place, so it uses the ablative.
What tense and meaning does manet have?

Manet is 3rd person singular present indicative active of manēre (to remain/stay).
So it means (he) stays / remains.

Why does Latin use ut here?

Ut introduces a purpose clause: in order that / so that. Purpose clauses in Latin typically use:

  • ut (for a positive purpose) + subjunctive verb
Why is possit in the subjunctive?

Because it’s inside a purpose clause introduced by ut. In Latin, purpose clauses require the subjunctive mood.
Possit is 3rd person singular present subjunctive of posse (to be able): so that he may be able / so that he can.

What’s the difference between potest and possit?

Both come from posse (to be able), but they differ in mood and typical use:

  • potest = present indicative (he can / he is able) — a straightforward statement
  • possit = present subjunctive (he may be able / so that he can) — commonly triggered by structures like ut purpose clauses, indirect questions, etc.
    Here, the purpose construction requires possit, not potest.
Why is cenam accusative?

Cenam is the direct object of finire (to finish). Direct objects are typically in the accusative case.

  • cena, -ae (f.) = dinner
  • cenam = accusative singular = dinner (as the thing being finished)
Why do we have an infinitive (finire) after possit?

Posse (like can in English) is followed by an infinitive to complete its meaning:

  • possit finire = can/may be able to finish
    So finire is the complementary infinitive explaining what the slave is able to do.
Why is the word order cenam finire rather than finire cenam?

Both are possible. Latin word order is flexible because meaning is shown by endings, not position.
That said, object + infinitive (cenam finire) is very common, and it can also give a smooth flow: the purpose is focused on the dinner before stating the action to finish.

What does the comma do in this sentence?

The comma separates the main clause from the subordinate purpose clause:

  • Main clause: Servus in culina manet
  • Purpose clause: ut cenam finire possit
    Latin punctuation is more of a reading aid than a strict grammatical requirement, but this is a standard way to show the clause boundary.
How would I negate the purpose clause if I wanted “so that he cannot” or “so that he does not”?

Two common patterns:

  • so that he is not able to: use non with the verb → ut cenam finire non possit
  • lest / so that he does not (negative purpose): use nē instead of ut → nē cenam finire possit
    Which is best depends on whether you’re emphasizing inability (non possit) or a negative purpose (nē).