Log inSign up

Mercator clam epistulam sub mensa relinquit, sed servus eam tollit et dominam vocat.

Mercator clam epistulam sub mensa relinquit, sed servus eam tollit et dominam vocat.
The merchant secretly leaves a letter under the table, but the servant picks it up and calls the mistress.
FromLesson 11inHardcore Latin
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Latin grammar?”
Latin grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Latin

Master Latin — from Mercator clam epistulam sub mensa relinquit, sed servus eam tollit et dominam vocat to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.

  • ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Latin freeBrowse the full course

More from this lesson

prandiumdomiDomi tacemus, ut aviam audire possimus.theatrumPrandium breve domi sumimus, deinde ad theatrum festinamus.turbaapertusIanua aperta est, et hospes intrat.

Questions & Answers about Mercator clam epistulam sub mensa relinquit, sed servus eam tollit et dominam vocat.

What case is mercator, and how do I know it’s the subject?

Mercator is nominative singular (a 3rd-declension noun meaning merchant). In Latin, the nominative most often marks the subject of the verb. Here it’s the person doing relinquit (leaves).

What does clam do in the sentence—what part of speech is it?

Clam is an adverb meaning secretly / in secret. It modifies the verb relinquit: the merchant leaves the letter secretly.
(It can also appear in other constructions, but here it’s simply an adverb.)

Why is epistulam in that form?

Epistulam is accusative singular of epistula (letter). The accusative is used for the direct object of a verb, and relinquit takes a direct object: he leaves the letter.

Why is it sub mensa and not sub mensam?

With sub, Latin typically uses:

  • ablative for location: sub mensā = under the table
  • accusative for motion toward: sub mensam = to/under the table (movement into position)

Here, sub mensa (ablative; written without macrons) describes where the letter is left: under the table.

But mensa looks like nominative—how can it be ablative?

For 1st-declension nouns like mensa, nominative singular and ablative singular look identical in normal spelling: mensa.
With macrons (vowel-length marks), they’re distinguished:

  • nominative: mensa
  • ablative: mensā

In context, after sub meaning location, it’s understood as ablative.

What tense is relinquit, and how can I tell?

Relinquit is present tense, 3rd person singular, active: he leaves.
It’s from relinquere (3rd conjugation). The -it ending signals he/she/it in the present.

Why is there a comma before sed?

The comma separates two independent parts of the sentence: 1) Mercator ... relinquit
2) sed servus ... tollit et ... vocat

Sed (but) introduces a contrast, and Latin (like English) often punctuates that break with a comma in modern editions.

What case is servus, and why isn’t it servum?

Servus is nominative singular (2nd declension), so it’s the subject of tollit and vocat.
If it were servum (accusative), it would normally be an object, which wouldn’t fit here because the slave is doing the actions.

What is eam, and what does it refer to?

Eam is the accusative singular feminine form of the pronoun is, ea, id (him/her/it/that).
It refers back to epistulam (feminine accusative singular), and it’s the direct object of tollit: the slave picks it up (the letter).

Why does Latin use eam instead of repeating epistulam?

Latin often avoids repetition by using a pronoun once the referent is clear. Since epistulam has just been mentioned and it’s feminine singular, eam is an efficient way to say it.

What does tollit mean here, and why is it also present tense?

Tollit is present tense, 3rd person singular, from tollere. In this context it means picks up / lifts (the letter).
It’s present tense to match the ongoing narrative sequence: he leaves..., but the slave picks up... and calls...

Why is dominam accusative, and what exactly is happening with vocat?

Dominam is accusative singular of domina (mistress, lady of the house).
Vocare commonly takes a direct object meaning to call (someone) / summon (someone). So dominam vocat means he calls/summons the mistress.

Does et dominam vocat mean the slave calls the mistress and also calls the letter something?

No. Here et links two verbs that share the same subject (servus):

  • tollit (picks it up)
  • vocat (calls the mistress)

So it’s: the slave picks it up and calls the mistress.

Why is the word order different from typical English word order?

Latin word order is flexible because noun endings show grammatical roles. This sentence uses a common Latin pattern:

  • subject (Mercator) + adverb (clam) + object (epistulam) + prepositional phrase (sub mensa) + verb (relinquit)

The order highlights or groups ideas (e.g., placing clam early emphasizes the secrecy), while the endings keep the meaning clear.