Log inSign up

Teste audito, iudex dicit mercatorem pecuniam reddere oportere.

Teste audito, iudex dicit mercatorem pecuniam reddere oportere.
After the witness has been heard, the judge says that the merchant must return the money.
FromLesson 11inHardcore Latin
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Latin grammar?”
Latin grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Latin

Master Latin — from Teste audito, iudex dicit mercatorem pecuniam reddere oportere to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.

  • ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Latin freeBrowse the full course

More from this lesson

prandiumdomiDomi tacemus, ut aviam audire possimus.theatrumPrandium breve domi sumimus, deinde ad theatrum festinamus.turbaapertusIanua aperta est, et hospes intrat.

Questions & Answers about Teste audito, iudex dicit mercatorem pecuniam reddere oportere.

Why is teste audito in the ablative, and what is this construction called?
Teste audito is an ablative absolute: a noun/pronoun in the ablative plus a participle (also ablative) forming a self-contained clause, grammatically “absolute” (not directly tied to the syntax of the main clause). It commonly gives background information like time or cause: “after the witness was heard” / “when the witness had been heard.”
What do testis and teste mean here, and why is it teste?
Testis means witness. The form teste is the ablative singular of the 3rd-declension noun testis, testis. It must be ablative because it’s part of an ablative absolute and must match the participle’s case.
Is audito active or passive, and what form is it?
Audito is passive: it’s the perfect passive participle of audire (to hear), declined in the ablative singular masculine to agree with teste. Literally it means “the witness having been heard.”
Why does Latin say the witness having been heard instead of after hearing the witness?
Latin often uses an ablative absolute with a passive participle to express what English would naturally express with an active clause. So teste audito focuses on the witness as the grammatical “topic” of the background clause, even though in English we’d typically say “after hearing the witness.”
What is the job of the comma after Teste audito?
It separates the ablative absolute phrase from the main clause. In English we often do the same with an introductory clause: “After…, the judge says…”
Why is iudex nominative?
Iudex is the subject of the main verb dicit (says), so it appears in the nominative case.
How does dicit introduce the rest of the sentence?

Dicit introduces an indirect statement (also called accusative-and-infinitive). Instead of “The judge says that…” followed by a finite verb, Latin typically uses:

  • an accusative “subject” (mercatorem), and
  • an infinitive verb phrase (… reddere oportere).
Why is mercatorem accusative?
Because in an indirect statement, the “subject” of the reported clause is put in the accusative. So mercatorem is the accusative “subject” of the idea “the merchant ought to return the money.”
What exactly is happening with oportere—why not oportet?

Oportet is the usual finite, impersonal verb meaning “it is proper/necessary; one ought.”
But after dicit, Latin turns the whole reported clause into an infinitive construction, so oportet becomes its infinitive oportere:

  • direct: mercatorem pecuniam reddere oportet = the merchant ought to return the money
  • indirect (after dicit): dicit mercatorem pecuniam reddere oportere = he says that the merchant ought to return the money
How do reddere and oportere relate—are there two infinitives on purpose?

Yes. Oportere takes an infinitive complement describing what ought to be done. Here:

  • oportere = to be necessary/appropriate (to ought)
  • reddere = what is necessary: to return
    So pecuniam reddere oportere = “that it is necessary to return the money / that (someone) ought to return the money.”
Why is pecuniam accusative?
Because pecuniam is the direct object of reddere (to return): you return the money, so it appears in the accusative.
What does the word order tell me? Why is mercatorem before pecuniam reddere oportere?

Latin word order is flexible, but here it helps chunk the sentence:

  • iudex dicit = main clause
  • mercatorem … oportere = the reported statement, with mercatorem placed early to signal the “subject” of the indirect statement
  • pecuniam reddere stays together as a natural verb-object unit (return the money) before oportere, which “wraps up” the necessity/obligation idea.