Log inSign up

Mater filio dicit eum tunicam puram induere oportere.

Mater filio dicit eum tunicam puram induere oportere.
Mother tells her son that he must put on a clean tunic.
FromLesson 11inHardcore Latin
AI Language TutorTry it ↗
“What's the best way to learn Latin grammar?”
Latin grammar becomes intuitive with practice. Focus on understanding the core patterns first — how sentences are structured, how verbs change form, and how words relate to each other. Our course breaks these concepts into small lessons so you can build understanding step by step.

Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor

Start learning Latin

Master Latin — from Mater filio dicit eum tunicam puram induere oportere to fluency

All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.

  • ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
  • ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
  • ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
  • ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions
Start learning Latin freeBrowse the full course

More from this lesson

prandiumdomiDomi tacemus, ut aviam audire possimus.theatrumPrandium breve domi sumimus, deinde ad theatrum festinamus.turbaapertusIanua aperta est, et hospes intrat.

Questions & Answers about Mater filio dicit eum tunicam puram induere oportere.

Why is filio in the dative case here, instead of accusative (filium)?

filio is dative because it marks the person spoken to (an indirect object): the mother says/tells to her son. With verbs of speaking like dico, Latin can add a dative for the addressee (English often uses to): mater filio dicit = the mother tells her son.
The accusative (filium) would more naturally be used if the son were the direct object of a different verb meaning warn/advise/urge, etc., or in different constructions.

What is eum doing if filio already refers to the son?

eum is the accusative subject of the indirect statement (the accusative-and-infinitive construction).
So:

  • filio = to the son (addressee)
  • eum = he (the person who ought to put on the tunic)

Latin often keeps these roles distinct: the addressee is in the dative, while the subject of the reported clause is accusative.

Is this an example of the accusative-and-infinitive (indirect statement) construction?

Yes. After dicit, Latin commonly reports what is said using:

  • an accusative subject (eum)
  • and an infinitive verb (oportere, with induere dependent on it)

So dicit eum ... oportere corresponds to English says that he ought to...

Why is oportere an infinitive and not oportet?

Because it sits inside indirect statement after dicit. In direct speech you could have:

  • oportet eum tunicam puram induere = he ought to put on a clean tunic

But after dicit, Latin typically turns the finite verb into an infinitive:

  • dicit ... oportere
Why are there two infinitives: oportere and induere?

oportere is an impersonal verb meaning it is proper/necessary, and it commonly takes a complementary infinitive to complete its meaning:

  • oportet (aliquem) facere = someone ought to do

So here:

  • oportere = to be necessary/ought
  • induere = what he ought to do (put on)
What case is tunicam puram, and why?

tunicam puram is accusative because it is the direct object of induere (to put on):

  • induere tunicam = to put on a tunic

And puram agrees with tunicam in gender (feminine), number (singular), and case (accusative).

Why does the adjective come after the noun: tunicam puram?

Latin allows flexible word order. Putting the adjective after the noun (tunicam puram) is very common and often neutral.
Placing it before (puram tunicam) is also possible and can add a bit more emphasis to clean depending on context.

Could eum be omitted?
Sometimes Latin can omit it if it’s obvious who the subject of the indirect statement is, but including eum is very normal—especially when you also have filio present and want to avoid ambiguity about whether the obligation applies to the son or someone else.
Why is it eum and not se?

se would normally refer back to the subject of the main verb (mater). So mater dicit se oportere... would mean the mother says that she herself ought to...
Here the obligation is on the son, not on the mother, so Latin uses eum.

What does the tense of induere (present infinitive) imply in indirect statement?

The present infinitive induere typically shows action simultaneous with the main verb (dicit) in reported speech: she says he ought (now/in general) to put it on.
If Latin wanted to stress prior action, it might use a perfect infinitive; if future, a future infinitive (or another strategy), but here the present fits the idea of a current/ongoing obligation.

Could Latin express this idea with a different construction (like ut + subjunctive) instead of dicit + infinitive?

Yes. Latin often uses other verbs and constructions for telling/urging. For example:

  • mater filium monet ut tunicam puram induat = the mother warns/advises her son to put on a clean tunic

But with dicit, the classic pattern is exactly what you see: accusative + infinitive (indirect statement).