hyugareul gilge sseuryeodaga wolgeup saenggak ttaemune geunyang iteulman swigiro haesseo.

Yes—쓰다 has several meanings, and here it means to use.

In Korean, 휴가를 쓰다 is a very common expression meaning to take vacation/leave or more literally to use one’s vacation days.

So:

• 휴가를 쓰다 = to take vacation / use vacation time
• 연차를 쓰다 = to use annual leave / take a personal day

This sounds natural in Korean because vacation time is treated like something you use.

길게 is the adverb form of 길다 (to be long), so it means for a long time or at length.

• 휴가를 길게 쓰다 = to take vacation for a long stretch / to take a long vacation

If you said 긴 휴가를 쓰다, that would focus more on a long vacation as a noun phrase. If you say 길게 쓰다, the focus is more on using it for a long period.

Both can work, but 길게 쓰다 sounds very natural when talking about the duration of leave.

-려다가 means something like:

• was going to ... but
• intended to ... and then
• was about to ... but changed course

So:

• 휴가를 길게 쓰려다가 = I was going to take a long vacation, but...

This grammar often implies that the original plan or intention did not happen because something changed.

A simple way to think about it:

• -려고 하다 = to intend to do
• -려다가 = was about to/intended to do, but then...

So the sentence sets up one plan first, then shows the decision changed later.

Usually, yes—it strongly suggests that the original intention was interrupted, changed, or not completed.

In this sentence:

• the speaker planned to take a long vacation
• but because of salary concerns, they ended up deciding to rest only two days

So the long vacation did not happen as originally intended.

That’s why -려다가 fits very well here.

Literally, it is something like:

• because of thoughts about my salary
• because of salary considerations

Breakdown:

• 월급 = monthly salary / paycheck
• 생각 = thought, consideration
• 때문에 = because of

So 월급 생각 때문에 does not just mean because of salary in a simple factual way. It has the nuance of:

• because I was thinking about money
• because I had my paycheck/earnings in mind
• because I was worried about the financial side

It sounds a bit more personal and reflective than just 월급 때문에.

You could say 월급 때문에, and that would mean because of my salary/pay.

But 월급 생각 때문에 adds the idea that the speaker was thinking about their financial situation.

Compare:

• 월급 때문에 = because of my salary / because of money
• 월급 생각 때문에 = because I was thinking about my salary / because salary concerns were on my mind

So 생각 makes the reason sound more like a personal consideration rather than a direct external cause.

그냥 often means:

• just
• simply
• in the end, just...
• rather...

In this sentence, it softens and simplifies the final decision:

• 그냥 이틀만 쉬기로 했어 = I just decided to take only two days off

It can suggest:

• I decided not to overthink it
• I settled on the simpler option
• I ended up just doing this instead

So it gives the sentence a natural, conversational feeling.

만 means only.

So:

• 이틀 = two days
• 이틀만 = only two days

It emphasizes that the speaker reduced the original plan.

Because the earlier plan was to take vacation for a long time, 이틀만 creates a clear contrast:

• originally: a long vacation
• actual decision: only two days

-기로 하다 means to decide to do something.

So:

• 쉬기로 했어 = I decided to rest / take time off

This is important because the sentence is about a change in plans:

1. the speaker intended one thing
2. then considered salary
3. then made a decision

That makes -기로 했어 very natural.

Compare:

• 쉴 거야 = I’m going to rest / I will rest
• 쉰다 = I rest / I’m resting / I’ll take off (depending on context)
• 쉬기로 했어 = I decided to take off

The last one best matches the decision-making nuance.

했어 is the casual/informal polite-to-close-friends style, often called banmal.

Here are the versions:

• 했어 = casual, natural with friends or in informal speech
• 했다 = plain written style / diary style / narrative style
• 했습니다 = formal polite style

So the sentence as written sounds like someone casually telling a friend:

• I was going to take a long vacation, but because I was thinking about my paycheck, I just decided to take only two days off.

Korean often omits the subject when it is obvious from context.

In this sentence, the subject is understood to be I because:

• the speaker is talking about their own vacation
• their own salary concerns
• their own decision

So even without 나는, the meaning is naturally understood.

If you added it, it could be:

• 나는 휴가를 길게 쓰려다가 월급 생각 때문에 그냥 이틀만 쉬기로 했어.

But in normal conversation, leaving it out sounds more natural.

Here it means something like to take time off or to be off from work.

쉬다 can mean several related things:

• to rest
• to take a break
• to take a day off
• to not work

Because the sentence is about 휴가 and 이틀, the meaning is specifically:

• to take two days off
• to not work for two days

So while rest is not wrong, in context it is really about time off from work.

Yes, that is a very good translation.

It captures several key nuances well:

• 휴가를 길게 쓰려다가 → I was going to use/take a long stretch of vacation
• 월급 생각 때문에 → because of money/salary concerns
• 그냥 이틀만 쉬기로 했어 → I just decided to take only two days off

That translation sounds especially natural in English because salary concerns and take two days off fit the context well.

Yes. The sentence has a mild feeling of:

• hesitation
• compromise
• practicality
• maybe a little disappointment

The structure shows that the speaker wanted one thing first, but then backed down for financial reasons.

Words like -려다가, 생각 때문에, and 그냥 help create that feeling:

• -려다가 = there was an original plan
• 생각 때문에 = the speaker reconsidered because of a concern
• 그냥 = they settled for the simpler/more limited choice

So emotionally, it feels like:

• I wanted to take a longer vacation, but realistically I couldn’t quite do that.