Questions & Answers about nakigoe wo kiita.
How do you read 鳴き声?
It is read なきごえ.
It comes from:
- 鳴く(なく) = to make a sound, cry, chirp, bark, etc.
- 声(こえ) = voice, sound
Together, 鳴き声 means the cry/call/sound made by an animal, bird, or insect.
Why is を used after 鳴き声?
を marks the direct object of the verb.
Here, the verb is 聞いた (heard / listened to), so 鳴き声を聞いた means that the cry/sound is what was heard.
So the structure is:
- 鳴き声 = the thing heard
- を = object marker
- 聞いた = heard
Why does the sentence end with the verb? In English, we say heard a cry, not a cry heard.
Japanese usually puts the verb at the end of the sentence.
So this follows a common Japanese pattern:
- object + を + verb
Here:
- 鳴き声 = object
- を = object marker
- 聞いた = verb
That word order is completely normal in Japanese.
What form is 聞いた?
聞いた is the plain past form of 聞く.
- 聞く = to hear / to listen / to ask
- 聞いた = heard / listened
This is the casual/plain form, not the polite form.
Compare:
- 聞いた = plain past
- 聞きました = polite past
What is the difference between 聞いた and 聞こえた?
This is a very common question.
- 聞いた focuses on the act of hearing/listening.
- 聞こえた means was audible / could be heard and often sounds more automatic or unintentional.
So:
- 鳴き声を聞いた = I heard the cry / I listened and heard it
- 鳴き声が聞こえた = I could hear a cry / a cry was audible
In many situations, both can be translated as I heard a cry, but the nuance is different.
Who heard it? There is no subject in the sentence.
Japanese often omits the subject when it is understood from context.
So 鳴き声を聞いた。 could mean:
- I heard a cry.
- He heard a cry.
- She heard a cry.
- They heard a cry.
The listener is expected to know who the subject is from the situation or previous sentences.
Does 鳴き声 usually refer to animals rather than people?
Why is there no word for a, an, or the?
Japanese does not have articles like English.
So 鳴き声 could mean:
- a cry
- the cry
- some cry/sound
The exact meaning depends on context.
That is very normal in Japanese, and learners usually need to rely on the situation rather than expecting a separate word for a/the.
Does 鳴き声 mean one cry, or could it mean multiple cries?
By itself, it does not clearly mark singular or plural.
So 鳴き声を聞いた could mean:
- heard a cry
- heard the cry
- heard cries or the sound
Japanese often leaves number unspecified unless it matters.
Is 鳴き声を聞いた。 a complete and natural sentence by itself?
Yes. It is short, but it is natural.
Japanese often allows short sentences when:
- the subject is already known
- the context is clear
- the speaker wants a simple statement
So even though English often wants something like I heard a cry, Japanese can naturally just say 鳴き声を聞いた。
Could を be left out in casual speech?
Sometimes in casual conversation, object particles can be dropped, so you may hear something like:
- 鳴き声聞いた。
However, in standard Japanese, especially in writing or careful speech, を is normally included:
- 鳴き声を聞いた。
So learners should usually keep を unless they are already comfortable with casual speech patterns.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning JapaneseMaster Japanese — from nakigoe wo kiita to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions