zatuon ga heru to, syuutyuu dekiru.

Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have hundreds of Japanese lessons and thousands of exercises.
Start learning Japanese

Start learning Japanese now

Questions & Answers about zatuon ga heru to, syuutyuu dekiru.

What’s the role of in 雑音が減る?
It’s the subject-marking particle. It marks 雑音 as the subject of the intransitive verb 減る, so the phrase means “(the) noise decreases.”
Why is 減る used instead of 少なくなる or 静かになる?
減る literally means “to decrease,” focusing on quantity. 少なくなる also means “to become fewer,” but is slightly more formal. 静かになる means “to become quiet,” emphasizing the state rather than the amount. All work, but 減る is most direct for “noise being reduced.”
What does indicate in 雑音が減ると?
Here is the conditional particle meaning “when/if.” It links two clauses, showing that once the noise decreases, the result (“able to concentrate”) follows.
Is the conditional the same as the English “if”?
Similar, but Japanese often implies an automatic or inevitable consequence rather than a pure hypothesis. It’s used for general truths or habitual results: “Whenever noise decreases, concentration becomes possible.”
Why is there a comma after ?
The comma marks a pause and separates the conditional clause from the main clause in writing. It’s optional but clarifies the sentence structure.
Why is the verb 集中できる used instead of 集中する?
集中できる is the potential form of 集中する, meaning “to be able to concentrate.” It expresses ability or possibility (you can concentrate) rather than the action itself.
Who is the subject of 集中できる? It isn’t written.
Japanese often omits the subject when it’s clear or general. Here it’s understood as “I,” “you,” or “one in general.”
Could you replace with or なら?

Yes.
雑音が減れば集中できる uses , which feels more hypothetical.
雑音が減るなら集中できる uses なら, implying “if that’s the case.”
Each shifts the nuance slightly, but the basic meaning stays.

Can the sentence be rearranged, for example, 集中できると雑音が減る?
No. The conditional clause (雑音が減る) must come before , and cause should precede effect. Reversing it would break the grammar and logic.