akusesukengen wo kakuninsi, kyouseiroguautosuru.

を marks アクセス権限 as the direct object of 確認し.

So the structure is:

• アクセス権限を確認し = check the access permissions
• 強制ログアウトする = forcibly log out

In other words, を belongs to 確認する, not to the whole sentence.

確認し is the continuative/stem form of 確認する.

• 確認する = to check / to confirm
• 確認し、... = check ..., and then ...

In this sentence, 確認し connects the first action to the second one.

Why not 確認して?
You often can use 〜て to connect actions, and 確認して、強制ログアウトする would also be understandable. But 確認し、... is especially common in:

• formal writing
• instructions
• manuals
• system messages
• business/technical Japanese

It sounds a bit more formal and concise.

Not exactly by itself, but in this sentence it works a lot like and then.

Here, 確認し links two actions:

1. check the access permissions
2. forcibly log out

So a natural English understanding is:

• Check the access permissions, then forcibly log out
• or Check the access permissions and forcibly log out

Important note: this し is not the same as the separate grammar point 〜し〜し, which is often used to list reasons or examples. Here it is simply the stem of する used to connect clauses.

Yes. It is a noun + する verb.

Breakdown:

• 強制 = force / compulsory
• ログアウト = logout
• する = do

Together, 強制ログアウトする means to forcibly log out or to force a logout.

This is very common in Japanese, especially with technical and business vocabulary. Japanese often takes a noun, including a loanword, and turns it into a verb with する.

Similar examples:

• 保存する = save
• 設定する = configure / set up
• ログインする = log in

Japanese often omits information that is understood from context.

This sentence does not explicitly say:

• who is checking the permissions
• who is doing the force logout
• who is being logged out

Depending on context, it could mean something like:

• The system checks the access permissions and forcibly logs the user out
• Check the access permissions and forcibly log out the user
• After checking access rights, perform a forced logout

In technical Japanese, this kind of omission is very normal. You are expected to infer the missing subject/object from the surrounding text.

By form, it is in the plain/dictionary style, not an explicit imperative.

However, in technical writing or documentation, plain-form sentences like this can function as:

• a procedural instruction
• a specification
• a description of system behavior

So depending on context, it may feel like:

• Check the access permissions and forcibly log out
  or
• The system checks the access permissions and forcibly logs out

Japanese manuals often use this style because it is compact and neutral.

The comma 、 separates the two parts of the sentence and makes the pause clearer.

Here it helps show the sequence:

• アクセス権限を確認し、
• 強制ログアウトする。

It is especially common in formal or technical writing to place 、 after a connected clause like this. It improves readability, but the basic grammar does not depend on the comma.

Normally, standard Japanese is written without spaces.

So the usual form would be:

アクセス権限を確認し、強制ログアウトする。

The spaces in your version are probably there only to help learners see the parts more easily. That is a teaching aid, not normal Japanese spelling.

権限 means authority, privilege, or access rights/permissions, depending on context.

In IT contexts, アクセス権限 usually means something like:

• access permissions
• access rights
• authorization level

So while permission is a good translation, 権限 can sound slightly more formal or system-level than everyday permission in English.

Possibly, depending on context.

• アクセス権 = access rights
• アクセス権限 = access permissions / authorization privileges

In many IT contexts, these are close in meaning. But 権限 can sound a little more like authorized privilege level, while 権 can sound a little more like a right.

In real usage, the exact term often depends on the product, company, or documentation style rather than a strict grammar difference.