Log inSign up

Ég bið um aðstoð við innskráninguna, því ég man ekki notendanafnið.

Ég bið um aðstoð við innskráninguna, því ég man ekki notendanafnið.
I ask for help with the login because I don’t remember the username.

Breakdown of Ég bið um aðstoð við innskráninguna, því ég man ekki notendanafnið.

ég
I
ekki
not
biðja um
to ask for
muna
to remember
því
because
við
with
innskráningin
the login
aðstoðin
the help
notendanafnið
the username
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Icelandic grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Icelandic now

Questions & Answers about Ég bið um aðstoð við innskráninguna, því ég man ekki notendanafnið.

Why does the sentence start with Ég bið um…? Is that a fixed expression?

Yes. biðja um is a very common verb + preposition combination meaning to ask for / request.

  • Ég bið um X. = I’m asking for X / I request X.
    It’s slightly formal/polite, like in customer support or official messages.
What case is aðstoð in, and how can I tell?

In Ég bið um aðstoð…, the noun aðstoð is the object of biðja um, so it’s in the accusative.
For aðstoð (a feminine noun), the accusative singular happens to look the same as the nominative (aðstoð), so you don’t see a visible ending change here.

What does við mean here, and what case does it take?

Here við means with / regarding / in connection with: help with the login.
In this meaning, við typically takes the accusative, which is why you get innskráninguna (accusative definite).

Why is it innskráninguna and not innskráningin or innskráningu?

Because it’s:

  • Definite (“the login”) → it takes the suffixed article.
  • Accusative singular (after við)
    For the feminine noun innskráning:
  • innskráning = (a) login (indefinite, nominative)
  • innskráningin = the login (definite, nominative)
  • innskráningu = (a) login (indefinite, accusative/dative singular)
  • innskráninguna = the login (definite, accusative singular)
Is innskráning the act of logging in, or the “login” (credentials/account) concept?

Usually innskráning refers to the process/act of signing in/logging in. In everyday use, though, it can also cover the general “login” situation (like “the login page / logging in”), especially in phrases like aðstoð við innskráninguna.

Why is there a comma before því?

Because því introduces a reason clause (“because …”), and it’s normal in Icelandic to separate that clause with a comma:

  • …, því ég man ekki notendanafnið. = “…, because I don’t remember the username.”
What’s the difference between því and af því að for “because”?

Both can mean “because,” but:

  • því is common in written Icelandic and often feels a bit more formal/compact.
  • af því að is also very common and can feel more conversational/explicit.

In many contexts they’re interchangeable, though punctuation and style may differ.

Why doesn’t the verb come second after því? (Why því ég man… and not því man ég…?)

Because því introduces a subordinate clause here. In subordinate clauses, Icelandic generally keeps normal subject–verb order:

  • því ég man ekki… (subject ég before verb man)

Verb-second (V2) word order is mainly a main clause pattern.

What verb is man from, and how does it work?

man is the 1st person singular present tense of muna (to remember). It’s irregular in the sense that the present forms don’t look like a simple stem + ending:

  • ég man = I remember
  • þú manst = you remember
  • hann/hún/það man = he/she/it remembers
  • við munum, þið munið, þeir muna
Where does ekki go in Icelandic sentences like this?

ekki usually comes after the finite verb (here man) and often after the subject as well:

  • ég man ekki … = I don’t remember …

That placement is very typical for simple present-tense negation.

Why is it notendanafnið (one long word), and what are its parts?

Icelandic commonly uses compound nouns.
notendanafnið = notenda- (users / user-) + nafnið (the name) → “the username.”
More literally: “the user-name.”

Why is notendanafnið definite (“the username”)?

In contexts like support requests, Icelandic often uses the definite form for specific expected items (like the username, the password), even if English might also say “my username” or “the username.”
You could also say things like notendanafnið mitt (my username), but the definite form alone is very natural here.

Why doesn’t notendanafnið change form as an object? Shouldn’t accusative look different?

notendanafn is neuter. In Icelandic, neuter nouns have the same form in nominative and accusative (especially in the singular).
So notendanafnið can serve as the object of man without changing its visible form.