Breakdown of Ég var næstum búin að gleyma töskunni.
Questions & Answers about Ég var næstum búin að gleyma töskunni.
Why is it “búin” and not “búinn” or “búið”?
Because the predicate adjective búinn/búin/búið agrees with the grammatical gender and number of the subject. With first-person singular:
- Female speaker: Ég var búin …
- Male speaker: Ég var búinn …
- Neuter is used with neuter subjects like það: Það var búið … In the plural you get búnir (masc./mixed), búnar (fem.), búin (neut.).
What does the construction “vera búinn að + infinitive” express?
Why is it “var” and not “er”?
Can a man say this sentence as-is?
Where should “næstum” go? Could I say “Ég var búin að næstum gleyma …”?
Place næstum right before the phrase it modifies. The natural placement here is before the “vera búinn (að …)” unit:
- Preferred: Ég var næstum búin(n) að gleyma … “Ég var búin að næstum gleyma …” is not idiomatic. You can also move “næstum” in a simple past sentence: Ég næstum gleymdi …
Could I just say “Ég gleymdi töskunni”? How does that differ?
Yes. Ég gleymdi töskunni states that the forgetting actually happened. By contrast:
- Ég var búin(n) að gleyma … = it had already happened by some past point.
- Ég var næstum búin(n) að gleyma … = it almost happened (but didn’t).
Why is it “töskunni” (dative) and not “töskuna” (accusative)?
Because the verb gleyma (“to forget”) governs the dative case for the thing forgotten. So you say:
- gleymdi töskunni (dat.) not ✗gleymdi töskuna (acc.).
How do we get from “taska” to “töskunni”?
Step by step:
- Base noun: taska (bag), feminine.
- Dative singular (indefinite): tösku (u-umlaut turns a → ö; see next Q).
- Add the definite article for dative singular feminine: -nni.
- Result: töskunni = “the bag” (dative singular definite).
Why does the vowel change from “a” to “ö” (taska → tösku/töskunni)?
That’s u-umlaut: in many words, an “a” changes to “ö” when a following syllable contains a “u”. So:
- taska → dative sg. tösku → dative sg. definite töskunni.
What is the role of “að” before “gleyma”? Can I drop it?
Að is the infinitive marker (“to”). In the construction vera búinn að + infinitive, you must include að:
- Ég var búin(n) að gleyma … (correct)
- ✗Ég var búin(n) gleyma … (incorrect)
Is “gleyma” used both for “forget something” and “forget to do something”?
Yes, with different patterns:
- Forget something: gleyma + dative (e.g., Ég gleymdi símanum = “I forgot the phone.”)
- Forget to do something: gleyma að + infinitive (e.g., Ég gleymdi að hringja = “I forgot to call.”)
Could I use “hafa” instead of “vera búinn að” (e.g., “Ég hafði gleymt töskunni”)?
Yes. Both are correct:
- Ég hafði gleymt töskunni = past perfect with hafa + supine (neutral/standard).
- Ég var búin(n) að gleyma töskunni = very common in speech; emphasizes resulting state (“was done having forgotten”). They usually mean the same thing; style and emphasis differ slightly.
Why not “Ég var næstum búna …”?
Predicate adjectives agree with the subject in the nominative. For a female speaker the nominative form is búin, not búna (which is accusative feminine). So:
- Correct: Ég var næstum búin …
- Incorrect: ✗Ég var næstum búna …
Are there other natural ways to say “almost” here?
Yes:
- næstum and næstum því are both common: Ég var næstum (því) búin(n) að gleyma …
- You can also say: Ég var við það að gleyma töskunni (“I was on the verge of forgetting the bag”), which puts extra stress on being right on the brink.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning IcelandicMaster Icelandic — from Ég var næstum búin að gleyma töskunni to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods.
- ✓ Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓ Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓ Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions