Question 1

What does the article A mean, and why is it A instead of Az?

Accepted Answer

A is the definite article “the.” Hungarian uses a before words that start with a consonant (e.g., a kávézó), and az before words that start with a vowel (e.g., az étterem). It’s purely phonetic, not grammatical gender.

Question 2

Why is the present tense bezár used to talk about the near future?

Accepted Answer

Hungarian often uses the present tense for scheduled or near-future events when a time adverb gives the future meaning. Here hamarosan (“soon”) supplies the future sense, so A kávézó hamarosan bezár naturally means “The café will close soon.” You can also say be fog zárni (“will close”), but that’s heavier and not needed here.

Question 3

What’s the difference between zár, bezár, and phrases like zárva van?

Accepted Answer

- bezár: “to close (up),” often used for a business closing (intransitive: A bolt bezár “The shop closes”) or transitive with an object (bezárja az ajtót “closes the door”).
- zár: “to close/lock.” For shops, you’ll also hear A bolt (hamarosan) zár; it’s common and colloquial.
- zárva van: “is closed” (state). A bolt zárva van = “The shop is closed.”
- To say “close down permanently,” add végleg: végleg bezár.

Question 4

Why is it bezár (prefix attached) and not zár be (prefix split) here?

Accepted Answer

In neutral statements, the verbal prefix usually stays attached to the verb: bezár. It splits off when something is focused, in negation, or in certain question structures:
- Focus: Most zár be a kávézó (“It’s now that the café is closing.”)
- Negation: A kávézó nem zár be.
- Question: Mikor zár be a kávézó?
With the future auxiliary, the prefix goes before the infinitive: be fog zárni.

Question 5

Why is the word order A kávézó hamarosan bezár? Could I say Hamarosan bezár a kávézó?

Accepted Answer

Both are correct:
- A kávézó hamarosan bezár: topic (“the café”) first, then the comment about it. Neutral, very natural.
- Hamarosan bezár a kávézó: puts extra emphasis on “soon”/the event of closing.
Avoid placing the time adverb after the verb in neutral style: A kávézó bezár hamarosan sounds marked or unnatural.

Question 6

What does hamarosan mean, and what are good synonyms?

Accepted Answer

hamarosan = “soon.” Common alternatives:
- nemsokára = soon (neutral)
- mindjárt = in a moment, very soon
- rövidesen = soon (a bit formal)
For “right away,” use rögtön or máris.

Question 7

What does menjünk mean exactly, and how is it formed?

Accepted Answer

menjünk is the 1st person plural imperative/jussive: “let’s go.” It’s formed with the imperative marker -j- plus the 1PL ending -unk/‑ünk. Because menni (“to go”) is irregular, the imperative stem is menj- + -ünk → menjünk. Vowel harmony makes it -jünk here (front vowels: e, ö, ü).

Question 8

Why isn’t it megyünk if I want to say “let’s go”?

Accepted Answer

megyünk is indicative (“we are going / we go,” a statement). To make a suggestion/command (“let’s go”), Hungarian uses the imperative/jussive: menjünk. Compare:
- Most megyünk. = “We are going now.” (statement)
- Most menjünk! = “Let’s go now!” (proposal/urge)

Question 9

Can I say menjünk most instead of most menjünk?

Accepted Answer

Yes. The difference is nuance:
- Most menjünk! puts focus on “now” (as opposed to later) because the focused element sits immediately before the verb in Hungarian.
- Menjünk most! is more neutral or afterthought-like.
Both are acceptable.

Question 10

How do I make it negative, like “Let’s not go (now)”?

Accepted Answer

Use ne + imperative:
- Ne menjünk (most)! = “Let’s not go (now).”
- With a particle: Ne menjünk el! = “Let’s not leave.”

Question 11

What’s the difference between menjünk, menjünk el, gyerünk, and induljunk?

Accepted Answer

- menjünk: “let’s go” (move/go somewhere).
- menjünk el: “let’s leave / let’s go away (from here).” The particle el adds “away/leave.”
- gyerünk!: “come on!” / “let’s go!” (urging, informal, not tied to actual motion direction).
- induljunk: “let’s set off / depart” (starting a journey).

Question 12

Why is there a comma between the two parts? Would a conjunction be better?

Accepted Answer

Hungarian often links closely related clauses with a comma, especially when the second is an imperative reacting to the first. You could also use a conjunction:
- A kávézó hamarosan bezár, úgyhogy most menjünk! (“…so let’s go now!”)
- …ezért… (“therefore…”) is more formal.
A dash is also stylistically common: …, – most menjünk!

Question 13

How do I pronounce the sentence? Any traps?

Accepted Answer

- Primary stress is on the first syllable of each word: A KÁ-vé-zó ha-ma-RO-san be-ZÁR, most MEN-jünk.
- Vowel length matters: á, é, ó, ü are long.
- Hungarian s is “sh” (English “shoe”): hamarosan = “ha-ma-ro-shan.”
- j is a “y” sound; nj in menjünk coalesces to a “ny” sound: roughly “MEN-nyünk.”

Question 14

Why is it A kávézó and not something like a case-marked form?

Accepted Answer

Here kávézó is the subject in basic (nominative) form. No case is needed because it’s not an object or showing location/direction. If you changed the role, you’d add case suffixes (e.g., a kávézóban = “in the café,” a kávézóhoz = “to the café”).

Question 15

How would I emphasize urgency, like “Let’s go already!”?

Accepted Answer

Add már or most már:
- Menjünk már!
- Most már menjünk!
These can sound impatient, depending on tone.

Question 16

Could I say the future with fog here? How would the prefix work?

Accepted Answer

Yes: A kávézó hamarosan be fog zárni. With fog + infinitive, the verbal prefix stays before the infinitive: be fog zárni (not “fog bezárni”).

A kávézó hamarosan bezár, most menjünk!

Breakdown of A kávézó hamarosan bezár, most menjünk!

Questions & Answers about A kávézó hamarosan bezár, most menjünk!

More from this lesson

Master Hungarian — from A kávézó hamarosan bezár, most menjünk to fluency