Még ha felesleges is a blúz, nem ajándékozzuk el.

Még ha means even if.

• ha = if
• még ha = even if

So the sentence sets up a contrast: even if the blouse is unnecessary, we still won’t give it away.

Here is does not mean too/also in the usual simple sense.

In a structure like még ha ... is, it helps create a concessive meaning: even if ... / although ... may be ....

So:

• Még ha felesleges is a blúz = Even if the blouse is unnecessary

This is is very common in Hungarian concessive clauses.

Because in Hungarian, the verb to be is usually omitted in the 3rd person singular present tense when the predicate is a noun or adjective.

So:

• A blúz felesleges. = The blouse is unnecessary.
• not A blúz van felesleges.

But in other tenses, the copula appears:

• A blúz felesleges volt. = The blouse was unnecessary.
• A blúz felesleges lesz. = The blouse will be unnecessary.

Hungarian word order is flexible and often shows emphasis or information structure, not just basic grammar.

In this sentence, putting felesleges first gives prominence to the idea unnecessary:

• Még ha felesleges is a blúz...
  = Even if the blouse is unnecessary...

You could also say:

• Még ha a blúz felesleges is...

That version is also correct. The difference is mostly about emphasis and rhythm, not basic meaning.

Because a blúz is the subject of the first clause, not the object.

In:

• felesleges is a blúz

the meaning is literally the blouse is unnecessary, so a blúz is nominative.

The thing being given away belongs to the second clause:

• nem ajándékozzuk el = we’re not giving it away

The object it is not said explicitly, but it clearly refers back to the blouse.

If you said the object explicitly in the second clause, it would be:

• nem ajándékozzuk el a blúzt

Felesleges means unnecessary, superfluous, not needed, or sometimes spare/excess depending on context.

In this sentence, it means something like:

• unnecessary
• not really needed anymore
• extra

So the idea is: Even if we don’t need the blouse, we still won’t give it away.

It means give it away as a gift.

The base verb is:

• ajándékoz = to give as a gift

With the verbal particle el, it becomes:

• elajándékoz = to give away, to gift away, to part with by giving as a present

So:

• ajándékozzuk el = we give it away
• nem ajándékozzuk el = we are not giving it away / we won’t give it away

Because Hungarian verbal particles often move away from the verb when the verb is negated, focused, or in certain other structures.

Compare:

• Elajándékozzuk. = We give it away.
• Nem ajándékozzuk el. = We do not give it away.

So under negation, el normally comes after the verb.

This is a very common rule in Hungarian.

Because the verb is in the definite conjugation.

Hungarian uses:

• indefinite conjugation when there is no definite object
• definite conjugation when the object is specific/definite

Here, the object is understood as the blouse / it, which is definite.

So:

• ajándékozunk = we give (something) as a gift
• ajándékozzuk = we give it / the specific thing as a gift

Even though the object is omitted, it is still understood from context, so the definite form is used.

Grammatically, it is present tense, but Hungarian often uses the present to express a future decision or intention, especially when the context makes it clear.

So this can mean:

• We are not giving it away
• We won’t give it away

Both are natural English translations, depending on context.

Yes, absolutely.

• Még ha felesleges is a blúz, nem ajándékozzuk el.
• Még ha a blúz felesleges is, nem ajándékozzuk el.

Both are correct. The difference is mainly stylistic and about emphasis.

• felesleges first puts more spotlight on unnecessary
• a blúz first sounds a bit more straightforward or neutral

A learner should recognize both patterns.