עם ציפוי נגד השתקפויות יש פחות סנוור.

A very literal breakdown is:

• עם = with
• ציפוי = coating
• נגד = against / anti-
• השתקפויות = reflections
• יש = there is / there are
• פחות = less / fewer
• סנוור = glare

So the sentence is basically:

With anti-reflection coating, there is less glare.

Hebrew often uses this kind of structure instead of something more directly parallel to English.

עם means with.

Here it introduces the condition or feature under which something happens:

• עם ציפוי נגד השתקפויות = with an anti-reflective coating

This is very natural in Hebrew. It is like saying:

• With this coating, there is less glare.

So the sentence starts by setting up the circumstance first, and then gives the result:

• יש פחות סנוור = there is less glare

Hebrew has no separate word for a / an.

So:

• ציפוי can mean a coating or just coating
• הציפוי would mean the coating

In this sentence, ציפוי is indefinite, so it means something like:

• a coating
• or more naturally in English, just coating

That is why עם ציפוי נגד השתקפויות can be understood as:

• with an anti-reflective coating
• or with anti-reflective coating

Yes. נגד literally means against.

But in Hebrew it is also commonly used in the sense of anti-, especially in practical or product-related language.

So:

• ציפוי נגד השתקפויות = literally a coating against reflections
• natural English: an anti-reflective coating or anti-glare coating

This is a very common Hebrew pattern:

• תרופה נגד כאבים = medicine against pain = pain medicine / pain relief medicine
• משקפיים נגד שמש is not standard, but the same logic appears in many product descriptions

So here נגד is functioning like anti-.

השתקפויות is the plural of השתקפות, which means reflection.

So:

• השתקפות = reflection
• השתקפויות = reflections

Hebrew often uses the plural where English might also use the plural in a general sense:

• against reflections
• meaning unwanted reflected images/light effects in general

That sounds natural in Hebrew product language.

Good question. The word is:

• השתקפויות

But here the ה is part of the noun’s pattern, not the definite article the.

The singular is:

• השתקפות

This noun comes from the verb להשתקף = to be reflected / to reflect itself

So the initial ה belongs to the word itself. It is not making it definite.

If it were definite, you would see:

• ההשתקפויות = the reflections

So:

• השתקפויות = reflections
• ההשתקפויות = the reflections

יש means there is or there are.

So:

• יש פחות סנוור = there is less glare

Hebrew uses יש to express existence or presence, very much like English there is / there are.

Examples:

• יש זמן = there is time
• יש בעיה = there is a problem
• יש פחות רעש = there is less noise

In your sentence, יש introduces the result: the amount of glare is reduced.

In Hebrew, present-tense sentences often do not use a separate word for is / are.

For example:

• הוא עייף = he is tired
• literally: he tired

But when Hebrew wants to say there is / there are, it uses יש.

So this sentence is not built like:

• The glare is less

It is built more like:

• There is less glare

That is why יש appears.

פחות usually means less or fewer, depending on the noun and the context.

Here:

• פחות סנוור = less glare

Because סנוור is basically an uncountable idea here, less is the best translation.

A few examples:

• פחות מים = less water
• פחות בעיות = fewer problems
• פחות רעש = less noise

So פחות is a very useful word for talking about a reduced amount.

סנוור means glare or dazzling brightness.

It refers to light that is so strong or reflective that it makes it hard to see comfortably.

It is related to the verb:

• לסנוור = to dazzle / to blind with light

So:

• סנוור can be understood as the noun glare
• פחות סנוור = less glare

In this sentence, it is the effect that gets reduced by the coating.

Because that would be a different structure.

Your sentence uses an existential pattern:

• יש פחות סנוור = there is less glare

That sounds natural and common in Hebrew, especially in descriptive or commercial language.

If you said something like הסנוור פחות, it would sound incomplete or unnatural in most contexts, because פחות usually needs a comparison or a noun phrase after it.

So Hebrew prefers:

• יש פחות סנוור
• יש פחות רעש
• יש פחות אור

This is a very common pattern.

Yes, it is a normal and understandable way to say it.

• ציפוי נגד השתקפויות = coating against reflections

In product descriptions, Hebrew often uses practical phrases like this instead of a single compact adjective.

Depending on context, you might also see other phrasings in real life, but this sentence sounds natural and clear.

So for a learner, this is a good phrase to recognize as:

• anti-reflective coating
• anti-glare coating

A simple pronunciation guide:

• עם = im
• ציפוי = tzi-POO-ee
• נגד = NE-ged
• השתקפויות = hish-ta-ke-FOO-yot
• יש = yesh
• פחות = pa-KHOT
• סנוור = sin-VER or sni-VER depending on speaker/style

So the whole sentence is approximately:

im tzi-POO-ee NE-ged hish-ta-ke-FOO-yot yesh pa-KHOT sin-VER

The main stresses are typically on:

• ציפוי
• נגד
• השתקפויות
• פחות
• סנוור

You can do a literal translation for understanding:

• With coating against reflections there is less glare

But that is not natural English.

A better translation would be:

• With an anti-reflective coating, there is less glare.
• An anti-reflective coating reduces glare.
• With anti-glare coating, there is less glare.

So yes, the word-for-word meaning helps you understand the Hebrew, but the natural English version is smoother.