Breakdown of Παρά την απαισιοδοξία των άλλων, εκείνη μίλησε με αποφασιστικότητα.
Questions & Answers about Παρά την απαισιοδοξία των άλλων, εκείνη μίλησε με αποφασιστικότητα.
What does παρά mean here?
Here παρά means despite or in spite of.
In this sentence, παρά + accusative is a common pattern meaning despite:
- παρά την απαισιοδοξία = despite the pessimism
Be careful: παρά can have other meanings in other contexts, but in this structure it is very often used this way.
Why is it την απαισιοδοξία and not another case?
Because παρά takes the accusative in this meaning.
So:
- η απαισιοδοξία = nominative, the pessimism
- την απαισιοδοξία = accusative, used after παρά
This is something you often just have to learn with the preposition: παρά in the sense of despite is followed by the accusative.
Why is it των άλλων?
των άλλων is the genitive plural and means of the others.
Breakdown:
- οι άλλοι = the others
- των άλλων = of the others
So:
- η απαισιοδοξία των άλλων = the pessimism of the others
Greek often uses the genitive where English uses of.
What is εκείνη doing here? Why not just leave it out?
Greek often leaves out subject pronouns, because the verb ending already shows the person.
So μίλησε by itself can already mean she spoke.
Adding εκείνη gives extra emphasis or contrast:
- Παρά την απαισιοδοξία των άλλων, εκείνη μίλησε με αποφασιστικότητα.
- This suggests something like despite the others’ pessimism, she spoke with determination—with emphasis on she.
So εκείνη is not required for basic grammar, but it adds focus.
Does εκείνη just mean she, or does it literally mean that one?
Originally and literally, εκείνη is the feminine form of that one / that woman.
But in context, it can function very naturally as an emphatic she.
So here it can carry a slight sense of contrast:
- the others were pessimistic,
- she, on the other hand, spoke with determination.
That is why translating it simply as she is usually best here, even though the Greek has a bit more emphasis than plain English she.
What form is μίλησε?
μίλησε is:
- aorist
- active
- indicative
- third person singular
From the verb μιλώ / μιλάω = to speak, to talk
So μίλησε means:
- he/she spoke
- he/she talked
The aorist is used here because it refers to a completed action or event.
Why is μίλησε used instead of something like μιλούσε?
Because μίλησε (aorist) presents the action as a single completed event:
- she spoke
If you said μιλούσε (imperfect), it would suggest an ongoing or repeated action in the past:
- she was speaking
- she used to speak
In this sentence, the speaker is describing one definite act, so μίλησε is the natural choice.
Why does Greek say με αποφασιστικότητα instead of using an adverb?
με αποφασιστικότητα literally means with determination.
Greek often expresses manner in two ways:
- with με + noun: με αποφασιστικότητα
- with an adverb: αποφασιστικά = decisively
Both can work, but they are not always identical in tone.
Here με αποφασιστικότητα sounds slightly more formal or descriptive, and it matches the English idea with determination very well.
Could this sentence also say αποφασιστικά instead of με αποφασιστικότητα?
Yes, a sentence like εκείνη μίλησε αποφασιστικά is possible.
The difference is mainly one of style and nuance:
- με αποφασιστικότητα = with determination, slightly more noun-based and often a bit more formal
- αποφασιστικά = decisively, more directly adverbial
The original sentence is perfectly natural and sounds a little more polished.
Why is there an article in την απαισιοδοξία? English sometimes would not use the.
Greek uses the definite article more often than English, including with abstract nouns.
Here the article is especially natural because the pessimism is made specific by των άλλων:
- την απαισιοδοξία των άλλων = the pessimism of the others
So this is not just pessimism in general, but a specific pessimism belonging to those other people.
Is the word order important here?
The word order is natural, but Greek is more flexible than English.
The sentence begins with:
- Παρά την απαισιοδοξία των άλλων
This puts the contrast first: despite the others’ pessimism...
Then:
- εκείνη μίλησε με αποφασιστικότητα
This highlights she as the person who responded differently.
A more neutral order is possible in Greek, but this version is good because it emphasizes the contrast between the others and her.
How would this sentence sound without εκείνη?
It would still be grammatical:
- Παρά την απαισιοδοξία των άλλων, μίλησε με αποφασιστικότητα.
That would simply mean:
- Despite the pessimism of the others, she spoke with determination.
The difference is that without εκείνη, the sentence is less emphatic. With εκείνη, the contrast is stronger: they were pessimistic, but she was determined.
What is the basic dictionary form of άλλων and απαισιοδοξία?
The dictionary forms are:
- άλλος = other
- απαισιοδοξία = pessimism
In the sentence:
- άλλων comes from άλλος and is genitive plural
- απαισιοδοξία appears here as απαισιοδοξία / απαισιοδοξίαν in older styles, but in modern Greek the form you need is απαισιοδοξία, with την απαισιοδοξία in the accusative
So it helps to recognize the base forms even when the endings change.
Sign up free — start using our AI language tutor
Start learning GreekMaster Greek — from Παρά την απαισιοδοξία των άλλων, εκείνη μίλησε με αποφασιστικότητα to fluency
All course content and exercises are completely free — no paywalls, no trial periods, no signup needed.
- ✓Infinitely deep — unlimited vocabulary and grammar
- ✓Fast-paced — build complex sentences from the start
- ✓Unforgettable — efficient spaced repetition system
- ✓ AI tutor to answer your grammar questions