032
Log inSign up

Zum Dessert esse ich Eis.

Zum Dessert esse ich Eis.
For dessert I eat ice cream.
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching German grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning German now

Questions & Answers about Zum Dessert esse ich Eis.

Why is it zum Dessert and not zu dem Dessert or something with für?

Zum is a contraction of zu dem. So literally, zum Dessert = zu dem Dessert (“to the dessert”), but in this context it means “for dessert / as dessert.”

In German, zu + dative is very common to express what something is for, especially with meals and occasions:

  • Zum Frühstück trinke ich Kaffee. – I drink coffee for breakfast.
  • Zum Geburtstag bekommst du ein Buch. – You get a book for your birthday.

You could say zu dem Dessert, but it sounds overly formal or unnatural in everyday speech. Zum is the normal, idiomatic form.

Using für das Dessert would focus more on “for the dessert (as a purpose/benefit)” and is not how Germans normally express “for dessert” in the sense of the course of a meal. For that meaning, zum Dessert is standard.

What grammatical case is Dessert in here, and why?

Dessert is in the dative case here, because the preposition zu always takes the dative.

  • Preposition: zu
  • Article for das Dessert in dative: dem
  • Contracted form: zu dem → zum

So underlying structure:

  • Zu dem Dessert esse ich Eis.
  • → contracted: Zum Dessert esse ich Eis.

Any time you use zu with a noun, that noun will be in the dative:

  • zu dem Haus → zum Haus
  • zu der Schule → zur Schule
  • zu den Freunden (no common contraction)
Why is Dessert capitalized?

In German, all nouns are capitalized, regardless of where they appear in the sentence.

Since Dessert is a noun, it must be written with a capital D:

  • das Dessert
  • Zum Dessert esse ich Eis.
  • Dieses Dessert ist lecker.

This rule applies to every noun: Haus, Tisch, Wasser, Eis, etc.

Why is there no article before Eis? Could I say ein Eis or das Eis instead?

In Zum Dessert esse ich Eis, Eis is used as a mass noun (“ice cream” in general), so no article is needed. This is common with foods when you talk about them in a general, non-countable way:

  • Ich esse Brot. – I eat bread.
  • Ich trinke Wasser. – I drink water.
  • Ich esse Eis. – I eat ice cream.

But you can use an article to change the meaning:

  • Ich esse ein Eis. – I eat an ice cream (one portion, e.g. one cone / one cup).
  • Ich esse das Eis. – I eat the ice cream (a specific one already known in the context).

So all of these are grammatically correct, but the nuance is different:

  • Zum Dessert esse ich Eis. – For dessert I eat (some) ice cream (in general).
  • Zum Dessert esse ich ein Eis. – For dessert I eat an ice cream (one serving).
  • Zum Dessert esse ich das Eis. – For dessert I eat the ice cream (that specific ice cream).
Are both Zum Dessert esse ich Eis and Ich esse Eis zum Dessert correct? What’s the difference?

Yes, both sentences are correct. German main clauses follow the verb‑second rule, but many elements can go in the first position.

  1. Zum Dessert esse ich Eis.

    • First position: Zum Dessert (time/occasion)
    • Second position: esse (the finite verb)
    • Then: ich Eis
    • Emphasis a bit stronger on when/for which course you eat ice cream.

  2. Ich esse Eis zum Dessert.

    • First position: Ich
    • Second position: esse
    • Then: Eis zum Dessert
    • More neutral; slightly more focus on I eat ice cream, and “for dessert” is extra information at the end.

German allows flexible word order, but the finite verb stays in second position in simple main clauses. Changing what you put first often changes emphasis more than meaning.

What gender do Dessert and Eis have in German?

Both Dessert and Eis are neuter nouns.

  • das Dessert – neuter
  • das Eis – neuter

You can see this in forms like:

  • Nominative:
    • Das Dessert ist lecker.
    • Das Eis schmeckt gut.
  • Accusative:
    • Ich esse das Dessert.
    • Ich esse das Eis.
  • Dative (singular):
    • zu dem Dessert → zum Dessert
    • mit dem Eis

In the sentence Zum Dessert esse ich Eis, the gender of Eis isn’t visible because there is no article, and Eis is in the accusative but with zero article.

Could I also say Als Dessert esse ich Eis or Zum Nachtisch esse ich Eis? Are these different from Zum Dessert esse ich Eis?

Yes, both are possible and commonly used, with slightly different flavors:

  1. Als Dessert esse ich Eis.

    • als = “as”
    • Literally: “As dessert, I eat ice cream.”
    • Focuses on the role: the ice cream is serving as the dessert.

  2. Zum Nachtisch esse ich Eis.

    • Nachtisch is another word for “dessert,” very common in everyday language.
    • Style: Nachtisch sounds a bit more informal / home-style than Dessert, which can sound slightly more formal or restaurant-like.

  3. Zum Dessert esse ich Eis.

    • Neutral, slightly more formal/restaurant context possible.

All three are correct; choice depends on style and what you want to emphasize. In everyday speech, Zum Nachtisch esse ich Eis is extremely natural.

Does Eis mean “ice cream” or “ice”? How do I know which one is meant?

Eis can mean both “ice cream” and “(frozen) ice”. The meaning comes from context.

  • ice cream:

    • Zum Dessert esse ich Eis. – For dessert I eat ice cream.
    • Möchtest du ein Eis? – Do you want an ice cream (cone/cup)?

  • (frozen) ice (like frozen water):

    • Das Eis auf dem See ist dünn. – The ice on the lake is thin.
    • Das Eis schmilzt. – The ice is melting.

In the sentence Zum Dessert esse ich Eis, it clearly means ice cream because you don’t normally eat lake ice as dessert.

Why is the verb form esse and not something else?

Esse is the 1st person singular present tense form of the verb essen (“to eat”).

Present tense of essen:

  • ich esse – I eat
  • du isst – you eat (singular, informal)
  • er/sie/es isst – he/she/it eats
  • wir essen – we eat
  • ihr esst – you eat (plural, informal)
  • sie essen – they eat / you eat (formal Sie)

Essen is irregular in du and er/sie/es forms (they have isst), but ich esse is regular-looking. In Zum Dessert esse ich Eis, the subject ich (“I”) matches the form esse.

Why does the sentence start with Zum Dessert? Is that required?

It’s not required, but it is allowed and natural. In German main clauses, the finite verb must be in second position, but many different elements can be in first position.

A few variants:

  • Zum Dessert esse ich Eis.
  • Ich esse zum Dessert Eis.
  • Eis esse ich zum Dessert. (emphasis on Eis)

All are grammatical. The choice of what goes first is about emphasis and flow, not about correctness, as long as the finite verb stays in position 2.

Starting with Zum Dessert places a bit more emphasis on the time/occasion (“as for dessert...”).