Breakdown of Wir geben die Romane rechtzeitig zurück, damit keine Gebühren entstehen.
wir
we
kein
no
damit
so that
der Roman
the novel
zurückgeben
to return
die Gebühr
the fee
entstehen
to arise
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching German grammar and vocabulary.
Questions & Answers about Wir geben die Romane rechtzeitig zurück, damit keine Gebühren entstehen.
Why is the separable verb zurückgeben split into geben and zurück in this sentence?
In German main clauses, separable verbs (like zurückgeben) appear divided: the conjugated part (geben) occupies the second position, and the prefix (zurück) moves to the end of the clause.
Why do we use damit to express purpose here instead of um ... zu?
Um … zu is used when the same subject performs both actions. In our sentence, the main clause subject is wir, but the subordinate clause is impersonal – Gebühren (actually the subject) entstehen. Because the subjects differ (or are impersonal), German requires damit for purpose clauses.
What case and number is die Romane, and why?
Die Romane is in the accusative plural, since it’s the direct object of zurückgeben. The plural indicates that multiple novels are being returned.
Why is there a comma before damit?
In German, every subordinate clause (including purpose clauses introduced by damit) must be preceded by a comma.
What does rechtzeitig mean here, and how is it different from pünktlich?
Rechtzeitig means “in good time” or “before a deadline,” emphasizing you avoid fines. Pünktlich means “punctually” or “at the exact agreed-upon time.” You return the books rechtzeitig to prevent fees.
How would you rewrite the sentence if you placed the purpose clause at the beginning?
Front the damit-clause and keep the main verb in second position: Damit keine Gebühren entstehen, geben wir die Romane rechtzeitig zurück.
Why does entstehen appear at the end of the damit-clause?
In German subordinate clauses (those introduced by conjunctions like damit), the finite verb is sent to the final position.
Why is the present tense used here, even though it refers to a future action?
German often uses the present tense for scheduled, habitual, or planned future actions. Using werden + infinitive is possible but more formal and less common in everyday speech.