Log inSign up

La rapidité de Paul me surprend.

La rapidité de Paul me surprend.
Paul's speed surprises me.

Breakdown of La rapidité de Paul me surprend.

Paul
Paul
de
of
me
me
surprendre
to surprise
la rapidité
the speed
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching French grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning French now

Questions & Answers about La rapidité de Paul me surprend.

Why is it la rapidité de Paul and not something like la rapidité de Paul's or Paul's rapidité?

French does not use the English ’s possessive structure. Instead, it almost always uses the preposition de to show possession or relationship.

  • English: Paul’s speed
  • French: la rapidité de Paul (literally: the speed of Paul)

So the structure is:

  • la rapidité = the speed (a noun)
  • de Paul = of Paul / Paul’s

You never say Paul’s rapidité in French; mixing the English possessive with a French noun is incorrect. The natural French order is always [the thing] de [the owner].

Why is the article la used with rapidité? How do I know it’s feminine?

In French, all nouns have a grammatical gender, masculine or feminine. Rapidité is feminine, so it takes the feminine singular article la.

A useful pattern:
Nouns ending in -té are very often feminine, for example:

  • la liberté – freedom
  • la beauté – beauty
  • la santé – health
  • la rapidité – speed, quickness

Because rapidité is feminine, the correct definite article is la, not le. So you say:

  • la rapidité de Paul (correct)
  • le rapidité de Paul (incorrect)
Why is it me surprend and not surprend moi?

In French, object pronouns (like me, te, le, la, nous, vous, les) usually go before the conjugated verb in a normal sentence.

The pattern is:

  • [subject] + [object pronoun] + [verb]

In your sentence:

  • subject: la rapidité de Paul
  • object pronoun: me
  • verb: surprend

So you get: La rapidité de Paul me surprend.

Surprend-moi (verb + moi) only appears in the imperative (commands):

  • Surprends-moi ! – Surprise me!

But in a normal statement, you must say me surprend, not surprend moi.

What exactly does me refer to here? Is it a direct or indirect object?

In this sentence, me is a direct object pronoun.

The verb surprendre is used with a direct object:

  • surprendre quelqu’un – to surprise someone

So if the direct object is me (me/I), you use the direct object pronoun me:

  • La rapidité de Paul me surprend.
    → Paul’s speed surprises me.

Even though the English preposition by appears in translations like I am surprised *by Paul’s speed, in French the structure is direct: *surprendre quelqu’un, without a preposition.

Why is it me surprend and not je suis surpris in this sentence?

Both structures are possible, but they emphasize slightly different things and have different grammar.

  1. La rapidité de Paul me surprend.

    • Literal: The speed of Paul surprises me.
    • Structure: subject = la rapidité de Paul, verb = surprend, object = me.
    • Focus: what causes the surprise (Paul’s speed).

  2. Je suis surpris par la rapidité de Paul.

    • Literal: I am surprised by Paul’s speed.
    • Structure: subject = je, passive-like/adjectival form suis surpris, complement = par la rapidité de Paul.
    • Focus: my state (being surprised).

Both are correct. Your sentence uses an active structure with surprendre as the main action. The alternative uses être surpris as an adjective/participial form describing a state.

How is surprend pronounced? Do you say the final d?

Surprend is pronounced approximately like sur-pran in English spelling.

In IPA: /syʁpʁɑ̃/

  • sur- → /syʁ/ (like “sür”, with a French u as in tu)
  • -prend → /pʁɑ̃/ (nasal vowel, a bit like “prahng” but without pronouncing a clear final ng)

Important: the final d in surprend is silent. You do not pronounce a [d] sound at the end.

So the whole sentence:

  • La rapidité de Paul me surprend.
    → /la ʁapidite də pɔl mə syʁpʁɑ̃/
What is the difference between La rapidité de Paul me surprend and Paul est rapide?

They are related but not equivalent:

  1. Paul est rapide.

    • Means: Paul is fast / quick.
    • Uses an adjective (rapide) to describe Paul.
    • Simply states a quality; no mention of anyone’s reaction.

  2. La rapidité de Paul me surprend.

    • Means: Paul’s speed surprises me.
    • Uses a noun (la rapidité) to make Paul’s speed into “a thing,” then says what this thing does (it surprises me).
    • Expresses not just the quality, but my reaction to that quality.

You might think of it like this:

  • Paul est rapide. → neutral description.
  • La rapidité de Paul me surprend. → evaluation + emotional/mental reaction.
Could I say La vitesse de Paul me surprend instead of La rapidité de Paul me surprend? Is there a difference?

You can say La vitesse de Paul me surprend, and it is perfectly correct. Both rapidité and vitesse can mean “speed,” but there’s a slight nuance:

  • vitesse

    • More concrete/physical: speed in terms of movement, pace, velocity.
    • Very common in contexts like cars, running, Internet speed, etc.

  • rapidité

    • More abstract or qualitative: quickness, swiftness, how fast something happens.
    • Can refer to mental quickness, reaction time, efficiency, etc.

In many everyday contexts, they overlap:

  • La vitesse de Paul me surprend. – I’m surprised by how fast he runs/drives, etc.
  • La rapidité de Paul me surprend. – I’m surprised by how quickly he does things (could be running, working, responding, understanding, etc.).

Context will usually make the best choice clear, but both are grammatical.

Where would I put an adverb like toujours or vraiment in this sentence?

In French, short adverbs like toujours (always), souvent (often), vraiment (really) generally go after the conjugated verb in simple tenses.

So you would say:

  • La rapidité de Paul me surprend toujours.
    → Paul’s speed always surprises me.

  • La rapidité de Paul me surprend vraiment.
    → Paul’s speed really surprises me.

The basic pattern:

  • [subject] + [object pronoun] + [verb] + [adverb]

So you do not say: La rapidité de Paul toujours me surprend in modern standard French.

Could I say La rapidité de Paul surprend moi instead? Why or why not?

No, La rapidité de Paul surprend moi is incorrect in standard French.

Two issues:

  1. Pronoun position:
    Object pronouns like me, te, le, la, nous, vous, les normally go before the conjugated verb, not after it, in statements.

    • Correct: La rapidité de Paul me surprend.
    • Incorrect: La rapidité de Paul surprend me/moi.

    The only common case where the pronoun comes after the verb is in the imperative (commands):

    • Surprends-moi ! – Surprise me!

  2. Choice of pronoun:

    • After a verb in the imperative: moi is used (e.g. surprends-moi).
    • Before a verb in a statement: me is used (e.g. me surprend).

So, in your sentence (a normal statement, not a command), the only correct form is:

  • La rapidité de Paul me surprend.
Why is surprend in the present tense here? How would the sentence look in the past?

Surprend is the 3rd person singular of surprendre in the present indicative:

  • il/elle surprend – he/she/it surprises

So La rapidité de Paul me surprend means:
→ Paul’s speed surprises me (now / generally).

If you want to talk about the past, you usually use the passé composé:

  • La rapidité de Paul m’a surpris(e).
    → Paul’s speed surprised me.

Structure:

  • auxiliary avoir in the present: a
  • past participle: surpris
  • object pronoun stays before the auxiliary: m’a surpris

If the speaker is female and it’s clearly an adjective, you may sometimes write surprise to show feminine agreement, but with avoir as an auxiliary and a preceding direct object pronoun, the agreement is a bit more advanced; for learners, m’a surpris is what you will most commonly see and need.