Log inSign up

Kirjastonhoitaja kirjoitti minulle hyllynumeron lapulle.

Kirjastonhoitaja kirjoitti minulle hyllynumeron lapulle.
The librarian wrote the shelf number for me on a note.

Breakdown of Kirjastonhoitaja kirjoitti minulle hyllynumeron lapulle.

minä
me
kirjoittaa
to write
-lle
onto
kirjastonhoitaja
librarian
-lle
for/to
hyllynumero
shelf number
lappu
note
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Finnish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Finnish now

Questions & Answers about Kirjastonhoitaja kirjoitti minulle hyllynumeron lapulle.

What part of speech is Kirjastonhoitaja, and why does it look so long?

Kirjastonhoitaja is a compound noun meaning librarian. Finnish forms compounds very freely by putting nouns together:

  • kirjasto = library
  • hoitaja = caretaker/attendant
    So kirjastonhoitaja literally means library attendant. It’s in the nominative here because it’s the subject of the sentence.
Why is it kirjoitti and not kirjoittaa?

kirjoittaa is the dictionary form (infinitive) to write.
kirjoitti is the past tense, 3rd person singular form: (he/she) wrote.

Very roughly:

  • infinitive: kirjoittaa = to write
  • past 3sg: kirjoitti = wrote
How do I know who wrote it, since there’s no “he/she” in Finnish?

Finnish usually doesn’t need a separate pronoun because the verb form already marks the person/number (and context supplies the rest). Here, Kirjastonhoitaja explicitly tells you who did it, so there’s no need for hän (he/she).

If you added a pronoun, it would usually be for emphasis/contrast:

  • Kirjastonhoitaja kirjoitti… = The librarian wrote…
  • Hän kirjoitti… = He/She wrote… (referring back to someone already mentioned)
Why is it minulle? What case is that?

minulle is the pronoun minä (I) in the allative case (-lle). The allative often marks an indirect object/recipient, like to me / for me.

So:

  • minulle = to me / for me
    It answers “to whom?” or “for whom?” the writing was done.
Could it be minua instead of minulle?

Not with this meaning. minua is partitive and is typically used for a direct object (e.g., He saw me = Hän näki minut/minua depending on nuance).
Here, I’m the recipient, not the thing being written, so minulle (allative) fits.

Why is hyllynumeron ending in -n?

hyllynumeron is hyllynumero (shelf number) in the genitive/accusative-looking -n form, used here as a total object: the librarian wrote down the (whole) shelf number.

In Finnish object marking, -n often signals the action is completed and the object is definite/whole:

  • kirjoitti hyllynumeron = wrote down the shelf number (as a complete piece of info)
What would change if it were hyllynumeroa (partitive) instead?

hyllynumeroa (partitive) would typically suggest an incomplete/ongoing action or an indefinite amount, depending on context. For example, it could imply something like:

  • writing some of the shelf number,
  • writing shelf-number information in a non-bounded way,
  • or focusing on the process rather than completion.

In this sentence, hyllynumeron is the natural choice because the shelf number is a bounded, complete item.

What case is lapulle, and why is it used?

lapulle is lappu (a note/piece of paper) in the allative case (-lle). Here it expresses the target surface/destination of writing: onto a note / on a slip of paper.

So:

  • lappu = note, slip of paper
  • lapulle = onto the note / on the note (in the sense of “onto”)
Why isn’t it lapussa (in the note) or lapulla (on the note) instead of lapulle?

These cases differ in nuance:

  • lapulle (allative) = onto the paper (focus on the act of putting writing there)
  • lapulla (adessive) = on the paper (often more about location/state: the writing is on it)
  • lapussa (inessive) = in the paper/note (usually sounds odd for writing; “inside” isn’t the typical metaphor for text placement)

For “wrote it down on a slip of paper,” lapulle is very idiomatic because it highlights the action of writing something onto it.

Is hyllynumeron a compound word, and how is it built?

Yes. hyllynumero = hylly (shelf) + numero (number).
Then it’s inflected into the -n form as hyllynumeron.

You also see a linking effect: hylly becomes hylly- and the compound behaves as one word for inflection.

How flexible is the word order here?

Finnish word order is fairly flexible because cases show grammatical roles. This is the neutral order:

  • Kirjastonhoitaja kirjoitti minulle hyllynumeron lapulle.

But you can move parts to change emphasis:

  • Minulle kirjastonhoitaja kirjoitti hyllynumeron lapulle. (emphasizes to me)
  • Hyllynumeron kirjastonhoitaja kirjoitti minulle lapulle. (emphasizes the shelf number)
  • Lapulle kirjastonhoitaja kirjoitti minulle hyllynumeron. (emphasizes onto the slip)

The meaning stays basically the same; the focus shifts.

If I drop minulle, is the sentence still OK?

Yes, grammatically it’s fine:

  • Kirjastonhoitaja kirjoitti hyllynumeron lapulle.

It just removes the recipient, so it becomes “The librarian wrote the shelf number on a slip of paper,” without specifying for whom/to whom.

How would I say the same sentence in the present tense?

Change the verb to present 3rd person singular:

  • Kirjastonhoitaja kirjoittaa minulle hyllynumeron lapulle. = The librarian writes / is writing the shelf number for me on a slip of paper.

Everything else can stay the same.