Log inSign up

Pidän vaaleasta kahvista aamulla.

Pidän vaaleasta kahvista aamulla.
I like light coffee in the morning.

Breakdown of Pidän vaaleasta kahvista aamulla.

minä
I
kahvi
the coffee
pitää
to like
aamulla
in the morning
vaalea
light
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Finnish grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Finnish now

Questions & Answers about Pidän vaaleasta kahvista aamulla.

Why is it kahvista and not kahvi or kahvia after pidän?

The verb pitää in the sense “to like” always takes its object in the elative case: -sta / -stä.

  • Pidän kahvista. = I like coffee.
  • literally: I like *from coffee.*

So:

  • kahvi = basic form (nominative), cannot be used after pitää (to like).
  • kahvia = partitive form, also not used with pitää jostakin.
  • kahvista = elative form, the one required by this verb.

You can think of the pattern:

pitää jostakin = to like something
(jostakin is “from something” in elative)

Other verbs that behave the same way:

  • tykätä jostakin – to like something
  • nauttia jostakin – to enjoy something
Why does vaaleasta have the same ending as kahvista?

Because adjectives in Finnish must agree with the noun in:

  • case
  • number
  • (and often) definiteness

Here, kahvista is:

  • singular
  • elative case (-sta)

So the adjective vaalea “light” must also be:

  • singular
  • elative → vaaleasta

That’s why we get:

  • vaaleasta kahvista
    • both words: singular elative.

Similarly:

  • iso talo → isosta talosta (from the big house)
  • hyvä kirja → hyvästä kirjasta (from the good book)
What case is the ending -sta in vaaleasta kahvista, and what does it literally mean?

The ending -sta / -stä is the elative case.

Its basic, concrete meaning is “out of / from inside”:

  • talosta – from (out of) the house
  • kaupasta – from the shop

In abstract use, it often means “about / concerning,” and in some verb constructions (like pitää jostakin) it becomes more idiomatic:

  • Pidän vaaleasta kahvista.
    literally: I like from light coffee
    naturally: I like light coffee.

So in this sentence it doesn’t mean physical movement. It’s just the case that pitää (to like) requires.

Could I say Pidän vaaleaa kahvia aamulla instead? What would that mean?

Yes, but it would mean something different, because now pidän would not mean “to like”.

With a direct object (here vaaleaa kahvia in the partitive), pitää normally means “to keep / to hold / to have”, not “to like”.

  • Pidän vaaleaa kahvia aamulla.
    is understood more like
    → I keep / have light coffee in the morning (a bit odd, like “I keep some light coffee around in the morning”).

To say “I like light coffee in the morning”, you really need the elative:

  • Pidän vaaleasta kahvista aamulla.

So:

  • Pitää jostakin → to like something (elative)
  • Pitää jotain → to keep/hold/have something (object case, typically partitive/accusative)
What’s the difference between pidän and tykkään?

Both can mean “I like”, but there are some nuances:

  • Pidän vaaleasta kahvista.
    • slightly more neutral or formal
  • Tykkään vaaleasta kahvista.
    • feels more informal / colloquial in many contexts

Grammatically, they behave the same way:

  • pitää jostakin
  • tykätä jostakin

Examples:

  • Pidän musiikista. / Tykkään musiikista. – I like music.
  • Pidän tästä kirjasta. / Tykkään tästä kirjasta. – I like this book.

In everyday speech, tykätä is extremely common. Pitää is also very common, but slightly more neutral or “bookish” depending on the context and region.

Why is it pidän and not pitän or pitään?

The basic (dictionary) form is pitää: “to hold / to keep / to like”.

When you conjugate it in the 1st person singular present:

  1. Take the stem: pidä-
    (this is an example of consonant gradation: t → d in this form)
  2. Add the 1st person ending -n.

→ pidä- + -n = pidän

So:

  • minä pidän – I like / I keep
  • sinä pidät
  • hän pitää
  • me pidämme
  • te pidätte
  • he pitävät

The change from pit- to pid- is just a regular sound change (gradation) in this verb.

What does aamulla literally mean, and why does it end with -lla?

Aamulla is the word aamu (morning) in the adessive case (-lla / -llä).

The adessive often means:

  • “on / at” a time or place.

So:

  • aamulla = in the morning / at morning
  • iltapäivällä = in the afternoon
  • yöllä = at night

In time expressions, -lla is very common:

  • maanantaina aamulla – on Monday morning
  • kello kahdeksalta aamulla – at eight in the morning

So Pidän vaaleasta kahvista aamulla. literally is something like:

I like from light coffee in the morning.
→ I like light coffee in the morning.

Can I move aamulla to a different place in the sentence? Does the meaning change?

Yes, Finnish word order is quite flexible. All of these are grammatical:

  • Pidän vaaleasta kahvista aamulla.
  • Aamulla pidän vaaleasta kahvista.
  • Pidän aamulla vaaleasta kahvista.

The basic meaning is the same: I like light coffee in the morning.

Small nuances:

  • Putting aamulla at the beginning ( Aamulla pidän… ) emphasizes the time:
    • As for the morning, that’s when I like light coffee.
  • Placing aamulla right after the verb ( Pidän aamulla vaaleasta kahvista ) is also natural and might make the time feel a bit more closely connected to the liking action.

But in everyday conversation, all of these are understood the same way.

Does Pidän vaaleasta kahvista aamulla mean something I do habitually or just once?

The Finnish present tense is used for both:

  • general habits
  • and one-time present situations

So Pidän vaaleasta kahvista aamulla most naturally means:

  • I (generally) like light coffee in the morning
    (a habit or preference).

If you wanted to stress repeated, habitual action even more, you could also say:

  • Pidän vaaleasta kahvista aamuisin.
    (I like light coffee in the mornings / every morning.)

But the original sentence is already perfectly fine for describing a regular preference.

Is vaaleasta kahvista singular or plural? How would I say “I like light coffees in the morning”?

Vaaleasta kahvista is singular, elative case:

  • vaalea kahvi (singular, nominative)
  • vaaleasta kahvista (singular, elative)

If you literally wanted a plural like “light coffees”, you could say:

  • Pidän vaaleista kahveista aamulla.
    (plural, elative: vaaleista kahveista)

However, in Finnish, coffee is usually talked about in the singular or as a mass noun, so for everyday speech, the singular vaaleasta kahvista is absolutely the normal choice, even if you drink many cups.

What exactly does vaalea kahvi mean in Finnish? Light roast or coffee with milk?

By itself, vaalea kahvi is ambiguous:

  1. It can mean light-roasted coffee:
    • more precisely: vaaleapaahtoinen kahvi
  2. It can also be understood as “light-colored coffee”, i.e. coffee with milk.

In everyday speech, people usually specify if they mean roast or milk:

  • vaaleapaahtoinen kahvi – light-roasted coffee
  • kahvi maidolla – coffee with milk

Your sentence Pidän vaaleasta kahvista aamulla. could be understood either way, depending on context and what has been talked about before. If you want to be very clear:

  • Pidän vaaleapaahtoisesta kahvista aamulla. – I like light-roasted coffee in the morning.
  • Pidän kahvista, jossa on maitoa, aamulla. – I like coffee with milk in the morning.
How would I say the same idea in a very natural, everyday Finnish way?

Several natural options, depending on the nuance you want:

  1. Keep it close to your original:

    • Pidän vaaleasta kahvista aamulla.
      – perfectly natural and correct.

  2. If you mean light roast:

    • Pidän vaaleapaahtoisesta kahvista aamulla.

  3. If you mean coffee with milk:

    • Pidän kahvista maidon kanssa aamulla.
    • Pidän kahvista, jossa on maitoa, aamulla.

  4. More colloquial (with tykätä):

    • Tykkään vaaleasta kahvista aamulla.
    • Tykkään vaaleapaahtoisesta kahvista aamulla.