Masarap ang sabaw ng manok lalo na kapag malamig ang gabi.

Breakdown of Masarap ang sabaw ng manok lalo na kapag malamig ang gabi.

ay
to be
masarap
delicious
gabi
the night
kapag
when
ng
of
malamig
cold
manok
chicken
sabaw
the soup
lalo na
especially
Elon.io is an online learning platform
We have an entire course teaching Filipino grammar and vocabulary.

Start learning Filipino now

Questions & Answers about Masarap ang sabaw ng manok lalo na kapag malamig ang gabi.

Why does the sentence start with Masarap instead of Ang sabaw ng manok like in English?

In Filipino, it’s very common (and natural) to put the predicate first and the topic/subject after.

  • Masarap ang sabaw ng manok.
    Literally: Delicious the chicken soup.
    Natural English: The chicken soup is delicious.

Here, masarap (delicious) is the predicate, and ang sabaw ng manok (the chicken soup) is the topic/subject.
Filipino often uses this predicate-first structure instead of a verb like is.

What does ang do in ang sabaw ng manok?

Ang is a marker that usually points to the topic/subject of the sentence.

  • ang sabaw ng manok = the chicken soup (as the thing being talked about)

So in the sentence:

  • Masarap ang sabaw ng manok.
    ang marks sabaw ng manok as the main thing being described as masarap.

Think of ang loosely like “the” + subject marker, but it does more than just what the does in English, because it also marks grammatical role (topic).

What is the role of ng in sabaw ng manok?

Here, ng links two nouns in a “X of Y” relationship:

  • sabaw ng manok = soup of chickenchicken soup

In this sentence:

  • sabaw = soup
  • ng manok = of chicken

So ng is functioning like of or an ’s-type linker, but it comes between the two nouns.

What’s the difference between ang and ng? They both appear in this sentence.

Yes, both appear but they have different jobs:

  • ang → marks the topic/subject (the main thing being talked about)

    • ang sabaw ng manok = the chicken soup (topic)
  • ng → can mark:

    • a non-topic noun (object, doer, etc.), or
    • a possessive / of-phrase (like in sabaw ng manok)

In this sentence:

  • ang sabaw ng manok = topic
  • inside that phrase, sabaw ng manok = soup of chicken, where ng links sabaw and manok.
Why is it sabaw ng manok and not sabaw na manok?

Ng and na can both act as linkers, but they’re used in different situations:

  • ng commonly links noun + noun (X of Y):

    • sabaw ng manok = soup of chicken
    • bahay ng guro = house of the teacher
  • na often links:

    • adjective + noun: mabait na bata (kind child)
    • sometimes noun + adjective: bahay na pula (red house)

In sabaw ng manok, both sabaw and manok are nouns, and the intended meaning is soup of chicken, so ng is the natural choice.
sabaw na manok would sound like “soup that is chicken”, which is odd and not the usual way to say chicken soup.

Why is there no word for “is” in this sentence?

Filipino often doesn’t use a separate “to be” verb (like is/are) in simple descriptive sentences.

  • Masarap ang sabaw ng manok.
    Literally: Delicious the chicken soup.
    Meaning: The chicken soup is delicious.

The relationship “X is Y” is shown by word order and markers (like ang), not by a verb like is.

You can add ay sometimes for a different word order:

  • Ang sabaw ng manok ay masarap.
    (Still: The chicken soup is delicious.)

But ay is optional and is more common in formal or written style.

What does lalo na add to the sentence?

Lalo na means “especially” or “even more so”.

In the sentence:

  • Masarap ang sabaw ng manok lalo na kapag malamig ang gabi.

The basic idea is: Chicken soup is delicious.
Lalo na adds: and it’s even more delicious in a certain situation.

So:

  • lalo na = especially / even more
  • lalo na kapag… = especially when …

It emphasizes that the statement is more true under the condition that follows.

What does kapag mean, and can I replace it with kung?

Kapag means “when” (for situations that are real, habitual, or expected).

  • Kapag malamig ang gabi = when the night is cold / on cold nights

You can often replace kapag with kung, and it will still be understood:

  • lalo na kapag malamig ang gabi
  • lalo na kung malamig ang gabi

Both are natural here. The nuance:

  • kapag leans more toward “whenever/when (it happens)”
  • kung can be “if/when”, sometimes more hypothetical

In this context (talking about typical cold nights), kapag is slightly more expected, but kung is also acceptable in casual speech.

Why is it malamig ang gabi and not ang gabi ay malamig?

Both are grammatically correct:

  • Malamig ang gabi.
  • Ang gabi ay malamig.

Differences:

  • Malamig ang gabi.

    • Predicate-first style (very common in speech)
    • Literally: Cold the night.
  • Ang gabi ay malamig.

    • Topic-first, using ay (more formal, often written or rhetorical style)
    • Literally: The night ay cold.

In everyday conversation, Malamig ang gabi sounds more natural.

The English says “on cold nights”, but Filipino uses singular gabi. Why?

Filipino often uses a singular noun to express a general or habitual time that English might pluralize:

  • kapag malamig ang gabi
    Literally: when the night is cold
    Natural English: when it’s a cold night / on cold nights

So gabi (night) is singular in form, but the meaning is generic/repeated.
If you say ang mga gabi, it sounds like you are talking about specific nights, not a general pattern.

How do I pronounce gabi here, and is it different from gabi the root crop?

Yes, same spelling, different stress and meaning:

  • ga-BÍ (stress on the second syllable) = night

    • This is the one in malamig ang gabi.
  • GÁ-bi (stress on the first syllable) = taro (the root crop)

In writing, both are gabi, but in speech, the stress distinguishes them. In this sentence, context and common usage make it clear that it means night.